journal article·2017-08Open access

The effect of graphite and carbon black ratios on conductive ink performance

Chris Phillips, Awadh Al-Ahmadi, Sarah-Jane Potts, Tim Claypole, Davide Deganello

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 52· Issue 16

Abstract

Conductive inks based on graphite and carbon black are used in a host of applications including energy storage, energy harvesting, electrochemical sensors and printed heaters. This requires accurate control of electrical properties tailored to the application; ink formulation is a fundamental element of this. Data on how formulation relates to properties have tended to apply to only single types of conductor at any time, with data on mixed types of carbon only empirical thus far. Therefore, screen printable carbon inks with differing graphite, carbon black and vinyl polymer content were formulated and printed to establish the effect on rheology, deposition and conductivity. The study found that at a higher total carbon loading ink of 29.4% by mass, optimal conductivity (0.029 Ω cm) was achieved at a graphite to carbon black ratio of 2.6 to 1. For a lower total carbon loading (21.7 mass %), this ratio was reduced to 1.8 to 1. Formulation affected viscosity and hence ink transfer and also surface roughness due to retention of features from the screen printing mesh and the inherent roughness of the carbon components, as well as the ability of features to be reproduced consistently.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Tehrani Z, Korochkina T, Govindarajan S, Thomas DJ, O’Mahony J, Kettle J, Claypole TC, Gethin DT (2015) Ultra-thin flexible screen printed rechargeable polymer battery for wearable electronic applications. Org Electron 26:386–394. doi: 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.08.00710.1016/j.orgel.2015.08.007 ↗
2. Lehtimäki S, Li M, Salomaa J, Pörhönen J, Kalanti A, Tuukkanen S, Heljo P, Halonen K, Lupo D (2014) Performance of printable supercapacitors in an RF energy harvesting circuit. Electr Power Energy Syst 58:42–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.01.00410.1016/j.ijepes.2014.01.004 ↗
3. Tehrani Z, Thomas DJ, Korochkina T, Phillips CO, Lupo D, Lehtimäki S, O’Mahony J, Gethin DT (2017) Large-area printed supercapacitor technology for low-cost domestic green energy storage. Energy 118:1313–1321. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.01910.1016/j.energy.2016.11.019 ↗
4. Švancara I, Vytřas K, Kalcher K, Walcarius A, Wang J (2009) Carbon paste electrodes in facts, numbers, and notes: a review on the occasion of the 50-years jubilee of carbon paste in electrochemistry and electroanalysis. Electroanalysis 1:7–28. doi: 10.1002/elan.20080434010.1002/elan.200804340 ↗
5. Cheng PL, Leung SYY, Law TW, Liu CK, Chong JIT, Lam DCC (2007) Quantitative analysis of resistance tolerance of polymer thick film printed resistors. IEEE Trans Compon Packag Technol 30:269–274. doi: 10.1109/TCAPT.2007.89796810.1109/TCAPT.2007.897968 ↗
6. Serra N, Maedera T, Lemaire P, Ryser P (2009) Formulation of composite resistive pastes for micro-heater manufacturing. Procedia Chem 1:48–51. doi: 10.1016/j.proche.2009.07.01210.1016/j.proche.2009.07.012 ↗
7. Zhang L, Liu T, Liu L, Hu M, Yang Y, Mei A, Han H (2015) The effect of carbon counter electrodes on fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cells. J Mater Chem A 3:9165–9170. doi: 10.1039/C4TA04647A10.1039/C4TA04647A ↗
8. Pantea D, Darmstadt H, Kaliaguine S, Roy C (2003) Electrical conductivity of conductive carbon blacks: influence of surface chemistry and topology. Appl Surf Sci 217:181–193. doi: 10.1016/S0169-4332(03)00550-610.1016/S0169-4332(03)00550-6 ↗
9. Oxfall H, Ariu G, Gkourmpis T, Rychwalski RW, Rigdahl M (2015) Effect of carbon black on electrical and rheological properties of graphite nanoplatelets/poly(ethylene-butyl acrylate) composites, eXPRESS. Polym Lett 9:66–76. doi: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2015.710.3144/expresspolymlett.2015.7 ↗
10. Park SB, Lee MS, Park M (2014) Study on lowering the percolation threshold of carbon nanotube-filled conductive polypropylene composites. Carbon Lett 15:117–124. doi: 10.5714/CL.2014.15.2.11710.5714/CL.2014.15.2.117 ↗
11. He L, Tjong SC (2013) Low percolation threshold of graphene/polymer composites prepared by solvothermal reduction of graphene oxide in the polymer solution. Nanoscale Res Lett 8:132. doi: 10.1186/1556-276X-8-13210.1186/1556-276X-8-132 ↗
12. Khan S, Lorenzelli L, Dahiya RS (2015) Technologies for printing sensors and electronics over large flexible substrates: a review. IEEE Sens 15:3164–3185. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2014.23752010.1109/JSEN.2014.237520 ↗
13. Azim SS, Satheesh A, Ramu KK, Ramu S, Venkatachari G (2006) Studies on graphite based conductive paint coatings. Prog Org Coat 55:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2005.09.00110.1016/j.porgcoat.2005.09.001 ↗
14. Erol M, Celik E (2013) Graphite-flake carbon-black-reinforced polystyrene-matrix composite films deposited on glass-fiber woven fabrics as plane heaters. Mater Technol 47:25–28
15. Martínez MC, López SH, Santiago EV (2015) Relationship between polymer dielectric constant and percolation threshold in conductive poly(styrene)-type polymer and carbon black composites. J Nanomater 607896:9. doi: 10.1155/2015/60789610.1155/2015/607896 ↗
16. Antunes RA, de Oliveira MCL, Ett G, Ett V (2011) Carbon materials in composite bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: a review of the main challenges to improve electrical performance. J Power Sources 196:2945–2961. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.04110.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.041 ↗
17. Smits FM (1958) Measurement of sheet resistivities with the four-point probe. Bell Syst Tech J 37:711–718. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1958.tb03883.x10.1002/j.1538-7305.1958.tb03883.x ↗
18. Barnes Howard A (2000) A handbook of elementary rheology. The University of Wales Institute of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics, Aberystwyth. ISBN 0953803201
19. Hoornstra J, Weeber AW, de Moor HH, Sinke WC (1997) The importance of paste rheology in improving fine line, thick film screen printing of front side metallization. In: Proc. 14th Eur. Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conf., pp 823–6
20. Jewell EH, Hamblyn SM, Claypole TC, Gethin DT (2013) The impact of carbon content and mesh on the characteristics of screen printed conductive structures. Circuit World 39:13–21. doi: 10.1108/0305612131129891810.1108/03056121311298918 ↗