journal article·2008-06

Effect of microstructure on the mechanical properties of PAN-based carbon fibers during high-temperature graphitization

Fujie Liu, Haojing Wang, Linbing Xue, Lidong Fan, Zhenping Zhu

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 43· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

The change of microstructure of PAN-based carbon fibers has been studied as a function of heat-treatment temperature (1,800–2,800 °C, stretching 0%) by Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction. With increasing heat-treatment temperature, both the crystallite size (La, Lc) and the degree of preferred orientation (g) increase, while the crystallite interlayer spacing (d002) decreases. The values of both Rs and Rc decrease, while Rs decreases more quickly. It implies that the degrees of skin-core of the carbon fibers increase. The relationship between mechanical properties and microstructure of the variants is also explored in detail.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Graphene research and applications · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Huang Y, Young RJ (1995) Carbon 33:97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(94)00109-D10.1016/0008-6223(94)00109-D ↗
2. Edie DD (1998) Carbon 36:345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00185-110.1016/S0008-6223(97)00185-1 ↗
3. Fizer E (1989) Carbon 27:621. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(89)90197-810.1016/0008-6223(89)90197-8 ↗
4. Endo M (1988) J Mater Sci 23:598. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0117469210.1007/BF01174692 ↗
5. Wicks BJ, Coyle RA (1976) J Mater Sci 11:376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0055144910.1007/BF00551449 ↗
6. Dieter L, Oskar P, Rennhofer H et al (2007) Carbon 45:2801. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2007.09.01110.1016/j.carbon.2007.09.011 ↗
7. Sadezky A, Muckenhuber H, Grothe H et al (2005) Carbon 43:1731. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.01810.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.018 ↗
8. Montes-Moran MA, Young RJ (2002) Carbon 40:845. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00212-310.1016/S0008-6223(01)00212-3 ↗
9. Endo M, Kin C, Karaki T et al (1998) Carbon 36:1633. doi:101016/S0008-6223(98)00157-210.1016/S0008-6223(98)00157-2 ↗
10. Melanttis N, Tetlow PL, Galiotis C (1996) J Mater Sci 31:851. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0035288210.1007/BF00352882 ↗
11. Afanasyeva NI, Jawhari T, Klimenko IV et al (1996) Vib Spectrosc 11:79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-2031(95)00063-110.1016/0924-2031(95)00063-1 ↗
12. Young RJ, Lu D, Day RJ et al (1992) J Mater Sci 27:5431. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0054160210.1007/BF00541602 ↗
13. Cuesta A, Dhamelincout P, Laureyns A et al (1998) J Mater Chem 8:2875. doi:https://doi.org/10.1039/a805841e10.1039/a805841e ↗
14. Dresselhaus M, Dresselhaus SG (1981) Adv Phys 30:290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0001873810010136710.1080/00018738100101367 ↗
15. Sadezky A, Muckenhuber H, Grothe H et al (2005) Carbon 43:1731. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.01810.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.018 ↗
16. Cuesta A, Dhamelincourt P, Laureyns J et al (1994) Carbon 32:1523. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(94)90148-110.1016/0008-6223(94)90148-1 ↗
17. Wang Y, Alsmeyer DC, McCreery RL (1990) Chem Mater 2:557. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/cm00011a01810.1021/cm00011a018 ↗
18. Al-Jishi R, Dresselhaus G (1982) Phys Rev B 26:4514. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.26.451410.1103/PhysRevB.26.4514 ↗
19. Moreton R, Watt W, Johnson W (1967) Nature 213:690. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/213690a010.1038/213690a0 ↗
20. Cooper GA, Mayer RM (1971) J Mater Sci 6:60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0055029210.1007/BF00550292 ↗
21. Johnson DJ (1987) J Phys D Appl Phys 20:287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/20/3/00710.1088/0022-3727/20/3/007 ↗
22. Young RJ, Lu D, Day RJ et al (1992) J Mater Sci 27:5431. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0054160210.1007/BF00541602 ↗