Calculation of elastic properties of natural fibers
Source abstract
Abstract
This article deals with the calculation of the elastic properties of cellulose based natural fibers by using two different types of idealization and assumptions. One model (model A) bases on antisymmertrical laminated structure, while the second one (model B) bases on a thick laminated composite tube model. Model B is able to take into account the elliptic geometry, the hollow based structure of the cross section of the fiber cell. The calculated relationships between spiral angle and modulus in fiber axis by model A fits successful experimental data for holocellulose fibers which were published elsewhere. In general, modulus in fiber axis decreases with increasing spiral angle as well as the degree of anisotropy, while shear modulus reaches a maximum for a spiral angle of 45°. Fiber cell modulus increases linear with increasing cellulose content for both, the calculated (model A) and measured values. The correlation between experimental data and calculation ones was not as high as in the case of modulus versus spiral angle. The discrepancy between model A and a more real cross section is calculated (model B) with roughly 30%.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Hearle, J.Appl.Polym.Sci. 7(1963) 1207.10.1002/app.1963.070070403 ↗
2. J. Hearle., J.Appl.Polym.Sci. 7(1963) 1635.10.1002/app.1963.070070506 ↗
3. J. Hearle., J.Polym.Sci.: Part C 20(1967) 215.
4. J. Hearleand J. T. Sparrow, J.Appl.Polym.Sci. 24(1979) 1857.10.1002/app.1979.070240807 ↗
5. D. Dinwoodie, “Wood: Nature's Cellular, Polymeric Fibre-Composites” (The Institute of Metals, 1989).
6. L. SalmÉn and A. De Ruvo, Wood and Fiber Science 17(3) (1985) 336.
7. L. SalmÉn, P. Kolseth and M. Rigdahl, in “Composite Systems from Natural and Synthetic Polymers,” edited by L. Salmén, A. de Ruvo, J. C. Seferis and E. B. Stark (Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam, 1986) p. 211.
8. M. Koponen, T. Toratti and P. Kanerva, Wood Science & Technology 23(1989) 55.10.1007/BF00350607 ↗
9. M. Koponen, T. Toratti and P. Kanerva., Wood and Fiber Science 25(1991) 25.
10. E. C. McLaughlin and R. A. Tait, J.Mater.Sci. 15(1980) 89.10.1007/BF00552431 ↗
11. K. G. Satyanarayana, C. K. S. Pillai, K. Sukumaran, S. G. K. Pillai, R. K. Rohatgi and K. Vijayan, ibid. 17(1982) 2453.10.1007/BF00543759 ↗
12. J. Gassan, Dissertation at the Institute of Materials Engineering, University of Kassel, Kassel, 1997.
13. N.-S. Hon, J.Appl.Polym.Sci. 37(1983) 845.
14. H. P. Fink, J. Ganster, J. Fraatz and M. Nywlt, Akzo-Nobel Viskose Chemistry Seminar-Challenges in Cellulosic Man-Made Fibers, Stockholm, 30.5.–3.6.1994.
15. R. Rikards, A. Chate and A. Korjakin, Engineering Computation 12(1995) 61.10.1108/02644409510799479 ↗
16. R. Rikards and A. Chate, Mechanics of Composite Materials and Structures 4(1997) 209.10.1080/10759419708945881 ↗
17. H. Altenbach, J. Altenbach and R. Rikards, “Einführung in die Mechanik der Laminat-und Sandwichtragwerke” (Deutscher Verlag der Grundstoffindustrie, Stuttgart, 1996).
18. Zienkiewicz, “The Finite Element Method” (MacGraw Hill, London, 1997).