journal article·2006-01

Post-β″ phases and their influence on microstructure and hardness in 6xxx Al-Mg-Si alloys

C. D. Marioara, H. Nordmark, S. J. Andersen, R. Holmestad

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 41· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Starting from solid solution (T4) or a condition with β″ precipitates (T6), three Al-Mg-Si alloys with similar total solute content (1.3 at%), but different Si/Mg ratios (2, 1.25 and 0.8) were isothermally heat-treated at 250 or 260°C and investigated by transmission electron microscopy. The result microstructure for all alloys and conditions consisted of metastable, needle-shaped precipitates growing along 〈100〉 directions in aluminium. Each of the phases β″-Mg5Si6, β′-Mg1.8Si, U1-MgAl2Si2 and U2-MgAlSi could be identified as main precipitate in the alloy with its solute Si/Mg ratio closest to the same ratio in the composition of that particular phase: The highest Si content alloy produced coarse needles of the trigonal U1-phase coexisting with finer precipitates of hexagonal B′-phase. The most common phase in the Mg-rich alloy is coarse needles of hexagonal β′-type. The Si/Mg ratio of 1.25 in one alloy is similar to the Si/Mg ratio in β″. Here the microstructure changes from that of fine β″ needles to fine needles of the orthorhombic U2-phase. This material remains strongest during heat-treatment. Nucleation on dislocations, mainly by the B′-phase, was observed to be significant in the case of Si-rich alloys heat-treated from T4-condition.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. C. D. MARIOARA, S. J. ANDERSEN, H. W. ZANDBERGEN and R. HOLMESTAD, Met. Mat. Trans. A (2004) in press.
2. K. MATSUDA, Y. SAKAGUCHI, Y. MIYATA, Y. UETANI, T. SATO, A. KAMIO and S. IKENO, J. Mater. Sci. 35 (2000) 179.10.1023/A:1004769305736 ↗
3. A. FRØSETH, R. HØIER, P. M. DERLET, S. J. ANDERSEN and C. D. MARIOARA, Phys. Rev. B. 67 (2003) 224106.10.1103/PhysRevB.67.224106 ↗
4. G. A. EDWARDS, K. STILLER, G. L. DUNLOP and M. J. COUPER, Acta Mater. 46 (1998) 3893.10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00059-7 ↗
5. C. D. MARIOARA, S. J. ANDERSEN, J. JANSEN and H. W. ZANDBERGEN, ibid. 49 (2001) 321.10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00302-5 ↗
6. P. M. DERLET, S. J. ANDERSEN, C. D. MARIOARA and A. FRΦSETH, J. Phys.: Cond. Matter. 14 (2002) 4011.
7. S. J. ANDERSEN, H. W. ZANDBERGEN, J. JANSEN, C. TRÆHOLT, U. TUNDAL and O. REISO, Acta Mater. 46 (1998) 3283.10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00493-X ↗
8. C. CAYRON and P. A. BUFFAT, ibid. 48 (2000) 2639.10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00057-4 ↗
9. S. J. ANDERSEN, C. D. MARIOARA, A. FRÆSETH, R. VISSERS and H. W. ZANDBERGEN, Mat. Sci. Eng. A 390 (2005) 127.10.1016/j.msea.2004.09.019 ↗
10. S. D. DUMULT, D. E. LAUGHLIN and J. C. WILLIAMS, Scripta Metallurgica 18 (1984) 1347.10.1016/0036-9748(84)90362-4 ↗
11. C. RAVI, C. WOLVERTON, Acta Mater. 52 (2004) 4213.10.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.037 ↗
12. S. J. ANDERSEN, Metall. Mater. Trans. 26A (1995)1931.10.1007/BF02670664 ↗
13. C. D. MARIOARA, S. J. ANDERSEN, J. JANSEN and H. W. ZANDBERGEN, Acta Mater. 51 (2003) 789.10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00470-6 ↗
14. O. R. MYHR, Φ. GRONG and S. J. ANDERSEN, ibid. 49 (2001) 65.10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00301-3 ↗
15. K. MATSUDA, S. TANIGUCHI, K. KIDO, Y. UETANI and S. IKENO, Mater. Trans. 43 (2002) 2789.10.2320/matertrans.43.2789 ↗