journal article·2010-11

In vitro degradation and cell attachment of a PLGA coated biodegradable Mg–6Zn based alloy

J. N. Li, P. Cao, X. N. Zhang, S. X. Zhang, Y. H. He

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 45· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

Currently available engineering magnesium alloys have several critical concerns if they are about to be used as biomaterials, particularly the concern about the toxicity of the common alloying elements such as aluminum and rare earth (RE). There is an increasing demand to develop new magnesium alloys that do not contain any toxic elements. It is also desirable, yet challenging, to develop such a material that has a controllable degradation rate in the human fluid environment. This paper presents mechanical properties, degradation, and in vitro cell attachment of a newly developed Mg–6Zn magnesium alloy. The alloy demonstrated comparable mechanical properties with typical engineering magnesium alloys. However, the bare alloy did not show an acceptable corrosion (degradation) rate. Application of a polymeric PLGA or poly(lactide-co-glycolide) coating significantly decreased the degradation rate. The results obtained from cell attachment experiments indicated that the mouse osteoblast-like MC3T3 cells could develop enhanced confluence on and interactions with the coated samples.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Williams D (2006) Med Device Technol 17:9
2. Mani G, Feldman MD, Patel D, Agrawal CM (2007) Biomaterials 28:168910.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.042 ↗
3. Peuster M et al (2006) Biomaterials 27:495510.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.029 ↗
4. Mueller PP, May T, Perz A, Hauser H, Peuster M (2006) Biomaterials 27:219310.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.042 ↗
5. Heublein B, Rohde R, Kaese V, Niemeyer M, Hartung W, Haverich A (2003) Heart 89:65110.1136/heart.89.6.651 ↗
6. Song G, Song S (2007) Adv Eng Mater 9:29810.1002/adem.200600252 ↗
7. Witte F, Fischer J, Nellesen J, Crostack H, Kaese V, Pischd A (2006) Biomaterials 27:101310.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.037 ↗
8. Witte F, Kaese V, Switzer H, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Wirth CJ, Windhag H (2005) Biomaterials 26:355710.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.049 ↗
9. Peuster M, Fink C, Schnakenburg CV (2003) Biomaterials 24:405710.1016/S0142-9612(03)00274-6 ↗
10. Zreiqat H, Valenzuela SM, Nissan BB, Roest R, Knabe C, Radlanski RJ, Renz H, Evans PJ (2005) Biomaterials 26:757910.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.024 ↗
11. Saris NL, Mervaala E, Karppanen H, Khawaja JA, Lewenstam A (2000) Clin Chim Acta 294:110.1016/S0009-8981(99)00258-2 ↗
12. Staiger MP, Pietak AM, Huadmai J, Dias G (2006) Biomaterials 27:172810.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.003 ↗
13. Zeng R, Dietzel W, Witte F, Hort N, Blawert C (2008) Adv Eng Mater 10:B310.1002/adem.200800035 ↗
14. Erbel R, Di Mario C, Bartunek J, Bonnier J, de Bruyne B, Eberli FR, Erne P, Haude M, Heublein B, Horrigan M, Llsley C, Bose D, Koolen J, Luscher TF, Weissman N, Waksman R (2007) Lancet 369:186910.1016/S0140-6736(07)60853-8 ↗
15. Hotz K, Murphy A (2006) Drug-eluting and absorbable stents push interventional frontiers. The American College of Cardiology. http://eurekalert.org/pub_release/2006-03/acoc-daa031206.php . Accessed 10 June 2010
16. Song G (2007) Corros Sci 49:169610.1016/j.corsci.2007.01.001 ↗
17. El-Rahman SSA (2003) Pharmacol Res 47:18910.1016/S1043-6618(02)00336-5 ↗
18. Ku C-H, Pioletti DP, Browne M, Gregson PJ (2002) Biomaterials 23(6):144710.1016/S0142-9612(01)00266-6 ↗
19. Yumiko N, Yukari T, Yasuhide T, Tadashi S, Yoshio I (1997) Fundam Appl Toxicol 37:10610.1006/faat.1997.2322 ↗
20. Gu X, Zheng Y, Cheng Y, Zhong S, Xi T (2009) Biomaterials 30:48410.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.021 ↗
21. Yuen CK, Ip WY (2010) Acta Biomater 6:180810.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.036 ↗
22. Zberg B, Uggowitzer PJ, Loffler JF (2009) Nat Mater 8:88710.1038/nmat2542 ↗
23. Göpferich A (1996) Biomaterials 17:10310.1016/0142-9612(96)85755-3 ↗
24. Athanasiou KA, Niederauer GG, Agrawal CM (1996) Biomaterials 17:9310.1016/0142-9612(96)85754-1 ↗
25. Zhang S, Zhang X, Zhao C, Li J, Song Y, Xie C, Tao H, Zhang Y, He Y, Jiang Y, Bian Y (2010) Acta Biomater 6:62610.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.028 ↗
26. Li Z, Gu X, Lou S, Zheng Y (2008) Biomaterials 29:132910.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.021 ↗
27. Zhang E, Yin D, Xu L, Yang L, Yang K (2009) Mater Sci Eng C 29:98710.1016/j.msec.2008.08.024 ↗
28. Song G, Atrens A, Stjohn D, Nairn J, Li Y (1997) Corros Sci 39(5):85510.1016/S0010-938X(96)00172-2 ↗
29. Hara N, Kobayashi Y, Kagaya D, Akao N (2007) Corros Sci 49:16610.1016/j.corsci.2006.05.033 ↗
30. Song G, Atrens A, Wu X, Zhang B (1998) Corros Sci 40:176910.1016/S0010-938X(98)00078-X ↗
31. Bonora PL, Deflorian F, Fedrizzi L (1996) Electrochim Acta 41:107310.1016/0013-4686(95)00440-8 ↗
32. Yfantis A, Paloumpa I, Schmeiber D, Yfantis DY (2002) Surf Coat Technol 151–152:40010.1016/S0257-8972(01)01654-1 ↗
33. Hanzi AC, Gunde P, Schinhammer M, Uggowitzer PJ (2009) Acta Biomater 5:16210.1016/j.actbio.2008.07.034 ↗
34. Cai K, Rechtenbach A, Hao J, Bossert J, Jandt KD (2005) Biomaterials 26:596010.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.020 ↗