Design of graded two-phase microstructures for tailored elasticity gradients
Source abstract
Abstract
Being one of new generation of composites, functionally graded materials (FGMs) possess gradually changed physical properties due to their compositional and/or microstructural gradients. In literature, exhaustive studies have been carried out in compositional modeling and design, while limited reports are available for microstructural optimization. This article presents an inverse homogenization method for the design of two-phase (solid/void) FGM microstructures, whose periodic base cells (PBCs) vary in a direction parallel to the property gradient but periodically repeat themselves in the perpendicular direction. The effective elasticity tensor at each PBC is estimated in terms of the homogenization theory. The overall difference between the effective tensor and their target is minimized by seeking for an optimal PBC material topology. To preserve the connectivity between adjacent PBCs, three methods, namely connective constraint, pseudo load, and unified formulation with nonlinear diffusion are proposed herein. A number of two-dimensional examples possessing graded volume fraction and Young’s modulus but constant positive or negative Poisson’s ratios are presented to demonstrate this computational design procedure.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Material Mechanics · Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Niion M, Maeda S (1990) J Iron Steel Inst Jpn 30:69910.2355/isijinternational.30.699 ↗
2. Miyamoto Y (1999) Functionally graded materials: design, processing and applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, London10.1007/978-1-4615-5301-4 ↗
3. Paul W (2001) 21st Century manufacturing. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey
4. Amada S, Untao S (2001) Compos B Eng 32:44910.1016/S1359-8368(01)00022-1 ↗
5. Nogata F, Takahashi H (1995) Compos Eng 5:74310.1016/0961-9526(95)00037-N ↗
6. Silva ECN, Walters MC, Paulino GH (2006) J Mater Sci 41:6991. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0232-310.1007/s10853-006-0232-3 ↗
7. Ray AK, Das SK, Mondal S, Ramachandrarao P (2004) J Mater Sci 39:1055. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000012943.27090.8f10.1023/B:JMSC.0000012943.27090.8f ↗
8. Bendsøe MP, Sigmund O (2003) Topology, optimisation: theory, methods, and applications. Springer, Berlin, New York
9. Sigmund O (1994) Int J Solids Struct 31:2313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(94)90154-610.1016/0020-7683(94)90154-6 ↗
10. Sigmund O (1994) Design of material structures using topology optimization. Technical University of Denmark
11. Bensoussan A, Papanicolaou G, Lions JL (1978) Asymptotic analysis for periodic structures. North Holland Pub Co., Amsterdam
12. Sanchez-Palencia E (1980) Non-homogeneous media and vibration theory. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
13. Sigmund O, Torquato S (1996) Appl Phys Lett 69:3203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.11796110.1063/1.117961 ↗
14. Zhou SW, Li Q (2007) J Phys D Appl Phys 40:6083. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/40/19/04810.1088/0022-3727/40/19/048 ↗
15. Zhou SW, Li Q (2008) J Mater Res 23:798. doi:https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2008.010110.1557/JMR.2008.0101 ↗
16. Guest JK, Prévost JH (2007) Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196:1006. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2006.08.00610.1016/j.cma.2006.08.006 ↗
17. Mumtaz KA, Hopkinson N (2007) J Mater Sci 42:7647. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1661-310.1007/s10853-007-1661-3 ↗
18. Dimitrov D, Schreve K, de Beer N (2006) Rapid Prototyping J 12:136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/1355254061067071710.1108/13552540610670717 ↗
19. Wang JW, Shaw LL (2006) J Am Ceram Soc 89:3285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01206.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01206.x ↗
20. Lin CY, Hsiao CC, Chen PQ, Hollister SJ (2004) Spine 29:1747. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000134573.14150.1A10.1097/01.BRS.0000134573.14150.1A ↗
21. Lin CY, Schek RM, Mistry AS, Shi XF, Mikos AG, Krebsbach PH et al (2005) Tissue Eng 11:1589. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2005.11.158910.1089/ten.2005.11.1589 ↗
22. Hollister SJ (2005) Nat Mater 4:518. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat142110.1038/nmat1421 ↗
23. Chen KZ, Feng XA (2004) Comput Aid Des 36:51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(03)00077-010.1016/S0010-4485(03)00077-0 ↗
24. Zhu F, Chen KZ, Feng XA (2006) Adv Eng Software 37:20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2005.03.01610.1016/j.advengsoft.2005.03.016 ↗
25. Seepersad CC, Kumar RS, Allen JK, Mistree F, McDowell DL (2004) J Comput Aided Mater Des 11:163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10820-005-3167-010.1007/s10820-005-3167-0 ↗
26. Schramm U, Zhou M (eds) (2006) Recent developments in the commercial implementation of topology optimization. Springer, Netherlands
27. Bendsøe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Comput Methods Appl M 71:197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-210.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2 ↗
28. Sigmund O (1994) J Intell Mater Syst Struct 5:736. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X940050060210.1177/1045389X9400500602 ↗
29. Cheng KT, Olhoff N (1981) Int J Solids Struct 17:305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(81)90065-210.1016/0020-7683(81)90065-2 ↗
30. Markworth AJ, Ramesh KS, Parks WP (1995) J Mater Sci 30:2183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0118456010.1007/BF01184560 ↗
31. Mori T, Tanaka K (1973) Acta Metall 21:571. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(73)90064-310.1016/0001-6160(73)90064-3 ↗
32. Hill R (1965) J Mech Phys Solids 13:213. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(65)90010-410.1016/0022-5096(65)90010-4 ↗
33. Reiter T, Dvorak GJ, Tvergaard V (1997) J Mech Phys Solids 45:1281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00007-010.1016/S0022-5096(97)00007-0 ↗
34. Hashin Z, Shtrikman S (1962) J Appl Phys 33:3125. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.172857910.1063/1.1728579 ↗
35. Zhou SW, Li Q (2008) Compu Mater Sci in progress
36. Zhou M, Rozvany GIN (1991) Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 89:309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(91)90046-910.1016/0045-7825(91)90046-9 ↗
37. Stolpe M, Svanberg K (2001) Struct Multidiscip Optim 22:116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158010012910.1007/s001580100129 ↗
38. Bendsoe MP, Sigmund O (1999) Arch Appl Mech 69:635. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419005024810.1007/s004190050248 ↗
39. Svanberg K (1987) Int J Numer Methods Eng 24:359. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.162024020710.1002/nme.1620240207 ↗
40. Haug EJ, Choi KK, Komkov V (1986) Design sensitivity analysis of structural systems. Academic Press, Orlando
41. Aubert G, Kornprobst P (2006) Mathematical problems in image processing: partial differential equations and the calculus of variations. Springer, New York10.1007/978-0-387-44588-5 ↗
42. Wang MY, Zhou S, Ding H (2004) Struct Multidiscip Optim 28:262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-004-0436-610.1007/s00158-004-0436-6 ↗
43. Bourdin B (2001) Int J Numer Methods Eng 50:2143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.11610.1002/nme.116 ↗
44. Brandel B, Lakes RS (2001) J Mater Sci 36:5885. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101292872695210.1023/A:1012928726952 ↗