journal article·2011-01

Toughening of epoxy using core–shell particles

G. Giannakopoulos, K. Masania, A. C. Taylor

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 46· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

An epoxy resin, cured using an anhydride hardener, has been modified by the addition of preformed core–shell rubber (CSR) particles which were approximately 100 or 300 nm in diameter. The glass transition temperature, T g, of the cured epoxy polymer was 145 °C. Microscopy showed that the CSR particles were well dispersed through the epoxy matrix. The Young’s modulus and tensile strength were reduced, and the glass transition temperature of the epoxy was unchanged by the addition of the CSR particles. The fracture energy increased from 77 J/m2 for the unmodified epoxy to 840 J/m2 for the epoxy with 15 wt% of 100-nm diameter CSR particles. The measured fracture energies were compared to those using a similar amount of carboxyl-terminated butadiene-acrylonitrile (CTBN) rubber. The CTBN particles provided a larger toughening effect when compared to CSR particles, but reduced the glass transition temperature of the epoxy. For the CSR-modified epoxies, the toughening mechanisms were identified using scanning electron microscopy of the fracture surfaces. Debonding of the cores of the CSR particles from the shells was observed, accompanied by plastic void growth of the epoxy and shell. The observed mechanisms of shear band yielding and plastic void growth were modelled using the Hsieh et al. approach (J Mater Sci 45:1193–1210). Excellent agreement between the experimental and the predicted fracture energies was found. This analysis showed that the major toughening mechanism, responsible for 80–90% of the increase in fracture energy, was the plastic void growth.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Drake RS, Siebert AR (1975) SAMPE Q 6:11
2. Kinloch AJ, Shaw SJ, Tod DA, Hunston DL (1983) Polymer 24:1341. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(83)90070-810.1016/0032-3861(83)90070-8 ↗
3. Kinloch AJ (2003) MRS Bull 28:44510.1557/mrs2003.126 ↗
4. Rowe EH, Siebert AR, Drake RS (1970) Mod Plast 47:110
5. Pearson RA, Yee AF (1986) J Mater Sci 21:2475. doi: 10.1007/BF0111429410.1007/BF01114294 ↗
6. Pascault JP, Williams RJJ (1999) In: Paul DR, Bucknall CB (eds) Polymer blends, volume 1: formulation. Wiley, New York
7. Bucknall CB, Partridge IK (1983) Polymer 24:639. doi: 10.1016/0032-3861(83)90120-910.1016/0032-3861(83)90120-9 ↗
8. Kinloch AJ, Yuen ML, Jenkins SD (1994) J Mater Sci 29:3781. doi: 10.1007/BF0035734910.1007/BF00357349 ↗
9. Day RJ, Lovell PA, Pierre D (1997) Polym Int 44:28810.1002/(SICI)1097-0126(199711)44:3<288::AID-PI866>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
10. Qian JY, Pearson RA, Dimonie VL, Elaasser MS (1995) J Appl Polym Sci 58:43910.1002/app.1995.070580222 ↗
11. Shen J, Zhang Y, Qiu J, Kuang J (2004) J Mater Sci 39:6383. doi: 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000043763.65417.4f10.1023/B:JMSC.0000043763.65417.4f ↗
12. Pearson RA, Yee AF (1991) J Mater Sci 26:3828. doi: 10.1007/BF0118497910.1007/BF01184979 ↗
13. Lin K-F, Shieh Y-D (1998) J Appl Polym Sci 70:231310.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981219)70:12<2313::AID-APP2>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
14. Becu-Longuet L, Bonnet A, Pichot C, Sautereau H, Maazouz A (1999) J Appl Polym Sci 72:84910.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990509)72:6<849::AID-APP10>3.0.CO;2-R ↗
15. Day RJ, Lovell PA, Wazzan AA (2001) Compos Sci Technol 61:4110.1016/S0266-3538(00)00169-X ↗
16. Hayes BS, Seferis JC (2001) Polym Compos 22:45110.1002/pc.10551 ↗
17. Young RJ, Beaumont PWR (1975) J Mater Sci 10:1343. doi: 10.1007/BF0054082410.1007/BF00540824 ↗
18. Spanoudakis J, Young RJ (1984) J Mater Sci 19:473. doi: 10.1007/BF0055357110.1007/BF02403234 ↗
19. Amdouni N, Sautereau H, Gerard JF (1992) J Appl Polym Sci 46:172310.1002/app.1992.070461004 ↗
20. Lee J, Yee AF (2000) Polymer 41:836310.1016/S0032-3861(00)00187-7 ↗
21. Kawaguchi T, Pearson RA (2003) Polymer 44:423910.1016/S0032-3861(03)00372-0 ↗
22. Kitey R, Tippur HV (2005) Acta Mater 53:116710.1016/j.actamat.2004.11.011 ↗
23. Kinloch AJ, Lee JH, Taylor AC, Sprenger S, Eger C, Egan D (2003) J Adhes 79:86710.1080/00218460309551 ↗
24. Kinloch AJ, Mohammed RD, Taylor AC, Eger C, Sprenger S, Egan D (2005) J Mater Sci 40:5083. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-1716-210.1007/s10853-005-1716-2 ↗
25. Ragosta G, Abbate M, Musto P, Scarinzi G, Mascia L (2005) Polymer 46:1050610.1016/j.polymer.2005.08.028 ↗
26. Zhang H, Zhang Z, Friedrich K, Eger C (2006) Acta Mater 54:183310.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.009 ↗
27. Kinloch AJ, Masania K, Taylor AC, Sprenger S, Egan D (2008) J Mater Sci 43:1151. doi: 10.1007/s10853-007-2390-310.1007/s10853-007-2390-3 ↗
28. Sober DJ (2008) Personal Communication. Kaneka, Houston
29. ISO-527–1 (1993) Plastics—determination of tensile properties—part 1: general principles. ISO, Geneva
30. ISO-527–2 (1996) Plastics—determination of tensile properties—part 2: test conditions for moulding and extrusion plastics. ISO, Geneva
31. ISO-13586 (2000) Plastics—determination of fracture toughness (GIC and KIC)—linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) approach. ISO, Geneva
32. Hsieh T-H, Kinloch AJ, Masania K, Sohn Lee J, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2010) J Mater Sci 45:1193. doi: 10.1007/s10853-009-4064-910.1007/s10853-009-4064-9 ↗
33. Fox TG (1956) Bull Am Phys Soc 1:123
34. Halpin JC, Pagano NJ (1969) J Compos Mater 3:72010.1177/002199836900300416 ↗
35. Kerner EH (1956) Proc Phys Soc B 69:80810.1088/0370-1301/69/8/305 ↗
36. Nielsen LE (1966) J Appl Polym Sci 10:9710.1002/app.1966.070100107 ↗
37. Ahmed S, Jones FR (1990) J Mater Sci 25:4933. doi: 10.1007/BF0058011010.1007/BF00580110 ↗
38. Nielsen LE, Landel RF (1994) Mechanical properties of polymers and composites. Marcel Dekker, New York
39. Kinloch AJ, Taylor AC (2006) J Mater Sci 41:3271. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-5472-010.1007/s10853-005-5472-0 ↗
40. Fornes TD, Paul DR (2003) Polymer 44:499310.1016/S0032-3861(03)00471-3 ↗
41. Luo J-J, Daniel IM (2003) Compos Sci Technol 63:160710.1016/S0266-3538(03)00060-5 ↗
42. Halpin JC (1969) J Compos Mater 3:73210.1177/002199836900300419 ↗
43. Halpin JC, Kardos JL (1976) Polym Eng Sci 16:34410.1002/pen.760160512 ↗
44. Lewis TB, Nielsen LE (1970) J Appl Polym Sci 14:144910.1002/app.1970.070140604 ↗
45. McGee S, McCullough RL (1981) Polym Compos 2:14910.1002/pc.750020403 ↗
46. Nielsen LE (1968) J Compos Mater 2:12010.1177/002199836800200111 ↗
47. Kinloch AJ (1987) Adhesion and adhesives: science and technology. Chapman & Hall, London10.1007/978-94-015-7764-9 ↗
48. Kunz SC, Beaumont PWR (1981) J Mater Sci 16:3141. doi: 10.1007/BF0054032310.1007/BF00540323 ↗
49. Andrews EH (1968) Fracture in polymers. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh
50. Sue H-J (1991) Polym Eng Sci 31:27510.1002/pen.760310411 ↗
51. Sue H-J (1991) Polym Eng Sci 31:27010.1002/pen.760310410 ↗
52. Karger-Kocsis J, Friedrich K (1992) Colloid Polym Sci 270:54910.1007/BF00658286 ↗
53. Cheng C, Hiltner A, Baer E, Soskey PR, Mylonakis SG (1995) J Mater Sci 30:587. doi: 10.1007/BF0035631510.1007/BF00356315 ↗
54. Azimi HR, Pearson RA, Hertzberg RW (1996) Polym Eng Sci 36:235210.1002/pen.10633 ↗
55. Chen TK, Jan YH (1992) J Mater Sci 27:111. doi: 10.1007/BF0240365210.1007/BF02403652 ↗
56. Guild FJ, Kinloch AJ, Taylor AC (2010) J Mater Sci 45:3882. doi: 10.1007/s10853-010-4447-y10.1007/s10853-010-4447-y ↗
57. Huang Y, Kinloch AJ (1992) J Mater Sci 27:2763. doi: 10.1007/BF0054070310.1007/BF00540703 ↗
58. Sultan JN, McGarry FJ (1973) Polym Eng Sci 13:2910.1002/pen.760130105 ↗
59. Guild FJ, Young RJ (1989) J Mater Sci 24:298. doi: 10.1007/BF0066097110.1007/BF00660971 ↗
60. Caddell RM (1980) Deformation and fracture of solids. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Ciffs
61. Guild FJ, Young RJ (1989) J Mater Sci 24:2454. doi: 10.1007/BF0117451110.1007/BF01174511 ↗