journal article·2000-08

The strain dependent indentation resilience of auxetic microporous polyethylene

K. L. Alderson, A. Fitzgerald, K. E. Evans

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 35· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

A series of tests have been conducted on (i) auxetic, (ii) compression moulded and (iii) sintered ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. The auxetic material possesses a negative Poisson's ratio, ν, due to its complex porous microstructure which consists of nodules interconnected by fibrils and the sintered material has a positive ν and is microporous but does not contain fibrils. It was found that the auxetic material was both more difficult to indent than the other materials at low loads (from 10–100 N) and was the least plastic with the most rapid viscoelastic creep recovery of any residual deformation. Indeed, at low loads, where the resistance to local indentation is most elastic, the hardness increased by up to a factor of 8 on changing the Poisson's ratio from ν ≈ 0 to ν ≈ −0.8. A mechanism is proposed based on local densification under the indentor of the nodules and fibrils which explains how the microstructural response of an auxetic polymer can be used to interpret the results.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer composites and self-healing · Polymer Foaming and Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. R. Lakes, Science N.Y. 235 (1987) 1038.10.1126/science.235.4792.1038 ↗
2. C. P. Chen and R. S. Lakes, J. Mat. Sci. 26 (1991) 5397.10.1007/BF00553637 ↗
3. B. D. Caddock and K. E. Evans, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 22 (1989) 1877.10.1088/0022-3727/22/12/012 ↗
4. K. L. Alderson and K. E. Evans, Polymer 33 (1992) 4435.10.1016/0032-3861(92)90294-7 ↗
5. A. P. Pickles, K. L. Alderson and K. E. Evans, Polym. Eng. and Sci. 36(5) (1996) 636.10.1002/pen.10451 ↗
6. J. P. Donoghue and K. E. Evans, in Proc. ICCM8, Honolulu, 1991, edited by S.W. Tsai and G. S. Springer (SAMPE), Covina 2-K-1-10.
7. K. E. Evans, I. J. Hutchinson, M. A. Nkansah and S. C. Rodgers, Nature 353 (1991) 124.10.1038/353124a0 ↗
8. K. E. Evans, Chem. Ind. 20 (1990) 654.
9. R. Lakes, Dev. Mech. 14b (1987) 758.
10. H. Hertz, J. Maths (Crelle J) 92 (1881)
11. S. P. Timoshenko and J. N. Goodier, “Theory of Elasticity,” 3rd ed. (McGraw Hill, New York 1970) p. 403.
12. R. S. Lakes and K. Elms, J. Comp. Mat. 27(12) (1993) 1193.10.1177/002199839302701203 ↗
13. N. Chan and K. E. Evans, J. Cellular Plastics 35(2) (1999) 130.10.1177/0021955X9903500204 ↗
14. K. L. Alderson, A. P. Pickles, P. J. Neale and K. E. Evans, Acta Met. et Mat. 42(7) (1994) 2261.10.1016/0956-7151(94)90304-2 ↗
15. Y. Tirupataiah and G. Sundararajan, Mat. Sci. and Eng. 91 (1987) 169.10.1016/0025-5416(87)90295-3 ↗
16. A. P. Pickles, R. S. Webber, K. L. Alderson, P. J. Neale and K. E. Evans, J. Mat. Sci. 30 (1995) 4059.10.1007/BF00360709 ↗
17. K. L. Alderson, A. P. Kettle, P. J. Neale, A. P. Pickles and K. E. Evans, J. Mat. Sci. 30 (1995) 4069.10.1007/BF00360710 ↗
18. P. J. Neale, A. P. Pickles, K. L. Alderson and K. E. Evans, ibid. 30 (1995) 4087.10.1007/BF00360712 ↗
19. Hoechst UK Ltd., Hoechst House, Salisbury Rd, Middlesex, TW4 6JH.
20. E. Murphy, private communication.
21. R. J. Crawford and G. Stephens, Polymer Testing 5 (1985) 113.10.1016/0142-9418(85)90015-7 ↗
22. K. L. Alderson, A. Alderson and K. E. Evans, J. Strain Analysis for Eng. Design 32(3) (1997) 201.10.1243/0309324971513346 ↗
23. D. Tabor, “The Hardness of Metals” (Oxford Univ. Press 1951) p. 44.
24. V. Lorenzo, J. M. Perena, J. G. Fatou, J. A. Mendez-Morales and J. A. Aznarez, J. Mat. Sci. 23 (1988) 3168.10.1007/BF00551290 ↗
25. I. G. Masters, Ph.D. thesis, University of Liverpool, 1994.