journal article·2004-10

High speed propulsion: Performance advantage of advanced materials

T. A. Jackson, D. R. Eklund, A. J. Fink

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 39· Issue 19
Publisher page

Abstract

High-speed air breathing propulsion systems have many attractive military and civil applications. The high propulsive efficiency of these systems allows the exploitation of speed, distance, and bigger payloads, or any combination of the three. The severe operating conditions of these systems require particular attention to overall thermal management of the engine/air-frame. Fuel-cooling the engine structure is a viable way of maintaining thermal balance over a range of flight conditions. Air Force applications have focused on using endothermic hydrocarbon fuels to address this issue because of their compatibility with the military operations. Recent ground tests of scramjet engines have demonstrated adequate performance utilizing state-of-the-art technology in materials. This progress has paved the way for an expendable flight test vehicle in the near future. In order to take full advantage of the capabilities of this propulsion system, advances in fuel-cooled structures, high temperature un-cooled materials, and increased heat capacity of hydrocarbon fuels will be needed to enable expendable systems to reach higher Mach numbers. An additional benefit would be realized in future reusable systems.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rocket and propulsion systems research · Heat transfer and supercritical fluids · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (12)

Show source-provided references
1. R. MERCIER and C. McCLINTON, “Hypersonic Propulsion—transforming the Future of Flight, ” AIAA 2003-2732 (2003).10.2514/6.2003-2732 ↗
2. I. M. BLANKSON, Presentation to the U.S.A.F. Scientific Advisory Board (1991).
3. A. C. NIXON, G. H. ACKERMAN, R. D. HAWTHORNE, A. W. RICHIE, H. T. HENDERSON and I. S. BJORKLND, “Vaporization and Endothermic Fuels for Advanced Engine Applications,” AFAPL TDR 64-100 (1964) Parts I, II, and III.
4. A. C. NIXON, G. H. ACKERMAN, L. E. FAITH, R. D. HAWTHORNE, H. T. HENDERSON, A. W. RICHIE, L. B. RYLAND and T. M. SHRYNE, “Vaporization and Endothermic Fuels for Advanced Engine Applications, ” AFAPL TDR 67-114 (1967) Parts I, II, and III.
5. H. HUANG, D. R. SOBEL and L. J. SPADACINNI, “Endothermic Heat-Sink of Hydrocarbon Fuels for Scramjet Cooling, ” 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA 2002-3871 (2002).10.2514/6.2002-3871 ↗
6. K.-C. LIN, P. J. KENNEDY and T. A. JACKSON, “Structures of Internal Flow and the Corresponding Spray for Aerated-Liquid Injectors, ” AIAA 2001-3569 (2001).10.2514/6.2001-3569 ↗
7. K.-C. LIN, S. COX-STOUFFER, P. J. KENNEDY and T. A. JACKSON, “Expansion of Supercritical Methane/Ethylene Jets in a Quiescent Subcritical Environment, ” AIAA 2003-0483 (2003).10.2514/6.2003-483 ↗
8. J. A. WHITE and J. H. MORISSON, “Pseudo-Temporal Multi-Grid Relaxation Scheme for Solving the Parabolized Navier-Stokes Equations, ” AIAA Paper 99-3360 (1999).10.2514/6.1999-3360 ↗
9. J. R. EDWARDS, Comp. and Fluids 26(6) (1997) 635.10.1016/S0045-7930(97)00014-5 ↗
10. T. H. PULLIAM and D. S. CHAUSSEE, J. Comp. Phys. 39 (1981) 347.10.1016/0021-9991(81)90156-X ↗
11. F. R. MENTER, “Zonal Two Equation k-ω Models for Aerodynamic Flows, ” AIAA Paper 93-2906 (1993).10.2514/6.1993-2906 ↗
12. D. C. WILCOX, “Wall Matching, a Rational Alternative to Wall Functions, ” AIAA Paper 89-0611 (1989).10.2514/6.1989-611 ↗