journal article·2010-02

Degradation behaviour and mechanical properties of magnesium implants in rabbit tibiae

Annett Krause, Nina von der Höh, Dirk Bormann, Christian Krause, Friedrich-Willhelm Bach, Henning Windhagen, Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 45· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

To investigate the initial mechanical strength and the degradation behaviour with the associated changes in mechanical properties of magnesium-based osteosynthesis implants, 30 rabbits were implanted with cylindrical pins of the alloys MgCa0.8 (magnesium with 0.8 wt% calcium), LAE442 (magnesium with 4 wt% lithium, 4 wt% aluminium and 2 wt% rare earths) and WE43 (magnesium with 4 wt% yttrium and 3 wt% rare earths). The implants were inserted into the medullary cavity of both tibiae. After 3 and 6 months, each half of the animals was euthanized, respectively, and the implants were taken out. A determination of volume, three-point bending tests, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray analyses as well as metallographic and μ-computed tomography examinations were accomplished. All implants were clinically well tolerated. MgCa-implants showed the least initial strength and the highest loss in volume after 6 months. SEM- and μ-computed tomography examinations revealed a pronounced pitting corrosion. Therefore, their use as degradable implant material seems to be limited. LAE442 has the best initial strength which seems to be sufficient for an application in weight-bearing bones. The degradation behaviour is very constant. However, possible unknown side effects of the rare earths have to be excluded in further investigations on biocompatibility. Considering all results of WE43, its application as osteosynthesis material for fracture repair is ineligible due to its heterogeneous and unpredictable degradation behaviour.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Hydrogen Storage and Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Hofmann GO (1995) Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 114:12310.1007/BF00443385 ↗
2. Meyer-Lindenberg A, Pruss M, Fehr M, Brunnberg L (1996) Prakt Tierarzt 77:987
3. Rehm KE, Helling HJ, Gatzka C (1997) Orthopade 26:489
4. Moses PA, Lewis DD, Lanz OI, Stubbs WP, Cross AR, Smith KR (2002) Aust Vet J 80:33610.1111/j.1751-0813.2002.tb14781.x ↗
5. Syrcle JA, Cook JL (2004) Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 17:12110.1055/s-0038-1632810 ↗
6. Long M, Rack HJ (1998) Biomaterials 19:162110.1016/S0142-9612(97)00146-4 ↗
7. Disegi JA, Eschbach L (2000) Injury 31(Suppl 4):210.1016/S0020-1383(00)80015-7 ↗
8. Wintermantel E, Ha S (1998) Biokompatible Werkstoffe und Bauweisen. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-662-06075-9 ↗
9. Raiha JE (1992) Clin Mater 10:3510.1016/0267-6605(92)90082-5 ↗
10. Kannan MB, Raman RK (2008) Biomaterials 29:230610.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.02.003 ↗
11. Aluminium-Zentrale Düsseldorf (2000) Magnesiumtaschenbuch. Aluminium, Düsseldorf
12. Wolff J (1892) Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. Hirschwald, Berlin
13. Turner CH (1992) J Biomech 25:110.1016/0021-9290(92)90240-2 ↗
14. Tsubota K, Suzuki Y, Yamada T, Hojo M, Makinouchi A, Adachi T (2009) J Biomech 42(8):108810.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.02.030 ↗
15. Verbrugge J (1934) La Press Med 23:460
16. Switzer E (2005) Resorbierbares metallisches Osteosynthesematerial. Dissertation, Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule, Hannover
17. Krause A, Hackenbroich C, von der Höh N, Wagner S, Bormann D, Hassel T, Windhagen H, Meyer-Lindenberg A (2005) Biomaterialien 6:190
18. Witte F, Michael B, Klement M, Goede F, Wirth CJ, Windhagen H (2005) In: Transactions of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/www.ors.org/web/Transactions.asp; No. 0989
19. Sha M, Guo Z, Fu J, Li J, Yuan CF, Shi F, Li SJ (2009) Acta Orthop 80:13510.1080/17453670902807490 ↗
20. Uctasli MB, Arisu HD, Lasilla LV, Valittu PK (2008) Eur J Dent 2:26310.1055/s-0039-1697390 ↗
21. Meyer-Lindenberg A, Krause A, Krause C, Bormann D, Windhagen H (2007) Biomaterialien 8:180
22. Lass J (2005) Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung einer magnesiumgerechten Strangpresstechnologie. Books on demand, Norderstedt
23. Xu L, Yu G, Zhang E, Pan F, Yang K (2007) J Biomed Mater Res A 83:70310.1002/jbm.a.31273 ↗
24. Li Z, Gu X, Lou S, Zheng Y (2008) Biomaterials 29:132910.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.021 ↗
25. von der Höh N, Krause A, Hackenbroich C, Bormann D, Lucas A, Meyer-Lindenberg A (2006) Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 113:439
26. Witte F, Fischer J, Nellesen J, Crostack HA, Kaese V, Pisch A, Beckmann F, Windhagen H (2006) Biomaterials 27:101310.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.037 ↗
27. Song G, Atrens A (1999) Adv Eng Mater 1:1110.1002/(SICI)1527-2648(199909)1:1<11::AID-ADEM11>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
28. Witte F, Kaese V, Haferkamp H, Switzer E, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Wirth CJ, Windhagen H (2005) Biomaterials 26:355710.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.049 ↗
29. Revell P, Damien E, Zhang X, Evans P, Howlett C (2004) Key Eng Mater 254–256:447
30. Song G, Atrens A (2003) Adv Eng Mater 5:83710.1002/adem.200310405 ↗
31. von der Höh N, Bormann D, Lucas A, Denkena B, Hackenbroich C, Meyer-Lindenberg A (2009) Adv Eng Mater 11:B4710.1002/adem.200800273 ↗
32. Acarturk O, Lehmicke M, Aberman H, Toms D, Hollinger JO, Fulmer M (2007) J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.3098710.1002/jbm.b.30987 ↗
33. Pardo A, Merino MC, Coy AE, Arrabal R, Viejo F, Matykina E (2008) Corros Sci 50:82310.1016/j.corsci.2007.11.005 ↗
34. Rettig R, Virtanen S (2008) J Biomed Mater Res A 85:16710.1002/jbm.a.31550 ↗