A critical review of piezoresistivity and its application in electrical-resistance-based strain sensing
Source abstract
Abstract
Piezoresistivity is an electromechanical effect characterized by the reversible change in the electrical resistivity with strain. It is useful for electrical-resistance-based strain/stress sensing. The resistivity can be the volumetric, interfacial or surface resistivity, though the volumetric resistivity is most meaningful scientifically. Because the irreversible resistivity change (due to damage or an irreversible microstructural change) adds to the reversible change that occurs at lower strains, the inclusion of the irreversible effect makes the piezoresistivity appear stronger than the inherent effect. This paper focuses on the inherent piezoresistivity that occurs without irreversible resistivity changes. The effect is described by the gage factor (GF), which is defined as the fractional change in resistance per unit strain. The GF can be positive or negative. Strong piezoresistivity involves the magnitude of the fractional change in resistivity much exceeding the strain magnitude. The reversible effect of strain on the electrical connectivity is the primary piezoresistivity mechanism. Giant piezoresistivity is characterized by GF ≥ 500. This critical review with 209 references covers the theory, mechanisms, methodology and status of piezoresistivity, and provides the first review of the emerging field of giant piezoresistivity. Piezoresistivity is exhibited by electrically conductive materials, particularly metals, carbons and composite materials with conductive fillers and nonconductive matrices. They include functional and structural materials. Piezoresistivity enables structural materials to be self-sensing. Unfortunately, GF was incorrectly or unreliably reported in a substantial fraction of the publications, due to the pitfalls systematically presented here. The most common pitfall involves using the two-probe method for the resistance measurement.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Materials for Construction · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Chung DDL (2010) Functional materials. World Science Publisher, Singapore Ch. 2 and 310.1142/7447 ↗
2. Chung DDL (2017) Carbon composites. Elsevier, Amsterdam Ch. 610.1016/B978-0-12-804459-9.00007-5 ↗
3. Chen S, Li Y, Yan D, Wu C, Leventis N (2019) Piezoresistive geopolymer enabled by crack-surface coating. Mater Lett 255:126582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.12658210.1016/j.matlet.2019.126582 ↗
4. Yang H, Gong LH, Zheng Z, Yao XF (2020) Highly stretchable and sensitive conductive rubber composites with tunable piezoresistivity for motion detection and flexible electrodes. Carbon 158:893–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.11.07910.1016/j.carbon.2019.11.079 ↗
5. Park JW, Jang J (2015) Fabrication of graphene/free-standing nanofibrillar PEDOT/P(VDF-HFP) hybrid device for wearable and sensitive electronic skin application. Carbon 87:275–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.02.03910.1016/j.carbon.2015.02.039 ↗
6. Sang Z, Ke K, Manas-Zloczower I (2019) Design strategy for porous composites aimed at pressure sensor application. Small 15(45):1903487. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20190348710.1002/smll.201903487 ↗
7. Liu X, Su G, Guo Q, Lu C, Zhou T, Zhou C, Zhang X (2018) Hierarchically structured self-healing sensors with tunable positive/negative piezoresistivity. Adv Funct Mater 28(15):1706658. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20170665810.1002/adfm.201706658 ↗
8. Daňová R, Olejnik R, Slobodian P (2020) Matyas J (2020) The piezoresistive highly elastic sensor based on carbon nanotubes for the detection of breath. Polymers (Basel, Switzerland) 12(3):713. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1203071310.3390/polym12030713 ↗
9. Tai Y, Mulle M, Aguilar Ventura I, Lubineau G (2015) A highly sensitive, low-cost, wearable pressure sensor based on conductive hydrogel spheres. Nanoscale 7(35):14766–14773. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr03155a10.1039/c5nr03155a ↗
10. Amjadi M, Kyung K, Park I, Sitti M (2016) Stretchable, skin-mountable, and wearable strain sensors and their potential applications: a review. Adv Funct Mater 26(11):1678–1698. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20150475510.1002/adfm.201504755 ↗
11. Abhang Y (2018) Review of different tactile sensors using piezoresistivity mechanism. J Mater Sci Eng 7(2):1000432/1–1000432/3. https://doi.org/10.4172/2169-0022.100043210.4172/2169-0022.1000432 ↗
12. Zhang B, Li B, Jiang S (2017) Poly(phenylmethylsiloxane) functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotube/poly(dimethylsiloxane) nanocomposites with high piezoresistivity, low modulus and high conductivity. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 28(9):6897–6906. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-6390-z10.1007/s10854-017-6390-z ↗
13. Al-Handarish Y, Omisore OM, Igbe T, Han S, Li H, Du W, Zhang J, Wang L (2020) A survey of tactile-sensing systems and their applications in biomedical engineering. Adv Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/404793710.1155/2020/4047937 ↗
14. Ansari MZ, Gangadhara BS (2014) Piezoresistivity and its applications in nanomechanical sensors. Proc Mater Sci 5:1308–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.44710.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.447 ↗
15. Jiang N, Namilae S, Unnikrishnan V (2020) Silicone/carbon nanotube sheet biofidelic piezoresistive sandwich composites. J Eng Mater Technol 142(1):11009. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.404464910.1115/1.4044649 ↗
16. Winkler C, Schaefer J, Jager C, Konnerth J, Schwarz U (2020) Influence of polymer/filler composition and processing on the properties of multifunctional adhesive wood bonds from polyurethane prepolymers II: electrical sensitivity in compression. J Adhes 96(1–4):185–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2019.165260210.1080/00218464.2019.1652602 ↗
17. Lee W, Hong S, Oh H (2019) Characterization of elastic polymer-based smart insole and a simple foot plantar pressure visualization method using 16 electrodes. Sensors 19(1):44/1–44/10. https://doi.org/10.3390/s1901004410.3390/s19010044 ↗
18. Ahuja P, Ujjain SK, Urita K, Furuse A, Moriguchi I, Kaneko K (2020) Chemically and mechanically robust SWCNT based strain sensor with monotonous piezoresistive response for infrastructure monitoring. Chem Eng J (Amsterdam, Neth) 388:124174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12417410.1016/j.cej.2020.124174 ↗
19. Fu X, Ramos M, Al-Jumaily AM, Meshkinzar A, Huang X (2019) Stretchable strain sensor facilely fabricated based on multi-wall carbon nanotube composites with excellent performance. J Mater Sci 54(3):2170–2180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2954-410.1007/s10853-018-2954-4 ↗
20. Penvern N, Langlet A, Gratton M, Mansion M (2020) Ait Hocine N (2020) Experimental characterization of the quasi-static and dynamic piezoresistive behavior of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/elastomer composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 39(7–8):299–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/073168442090175410.1177/0731684420901754 ↗
21. Liao Y, Duan F, Zhang H, Lu Y, Zeng Z, Liu M, Xu H, Gao C, Zhou L, Jin H et al (2019) Ultrafast response of spray-on nanocomposite piezoresistive sensors to broadband ultrasound. Carbon 143:743–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.11.07410.1016/j.carbon.2018.11.074 ↗
22. Wen S, Chung DDL (2000) Uniaxial tension in carbon fiber reinforced cement, sensed by electrical resistivity measurement in longitudinal and transverse directions. Cem Concr Res 30(8):1289–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-8846(00)00304-510.1016/s0008-8846(00)00304-5 ↗
23. Vipulanandan C, Mohammed A (2015) Smart cement rheological and piezoresistive behavior for oil well applications. J Petrol Sci Eng 135:50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2015.08.01510.1016/j.petrol.2015.08.015 ↗
24. Tao J, Wang J, Zeng Q (2020) Comparative study on influences of CNT and GNP on piezoresistivity of cement composites. Mater Lett 259:126858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.12685810.1016/j.matlet.2019.126858 ↗
25. Wen S, Chung DDL (2003) A comparative study of steel- and carbon-fibre cement as piezoresistive strain sensors. Adv Cem Res 15(3):119–128. https://doi.org/10.1680/adcr.2003.15.3.11910.1680/adcr.2003.15.3.119 ↗
26. Dong W, Li W, Wang K, Han B, Sheng D, Shah SP (2020) Investigation on physicochemical and piezoresistive properties of smart WCNT/cementitious composite exposed to elevated temperatures. Cement Concr Compos 112:103675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10367510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103675 ↗
27. Segura I, Faneca G, Torrents JM, Aguado A (2019) Self-sensing concrete made from recycled carbon fibres. Smart Mater Struct 28(10):105045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab3d5910.1088/1361-665X/ab3d59 ↗
28. Dong W, Li W, Wang K, Luo Z, Sheng D (2020) Self-sensing capabilities of cement-based sensor with layer-distributed conductive rubber fibres. Sens Actuators A 301:111763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2019.11176310.1016/j.sna.2019.111763 ↗
29. Dong W, Li W, Long G, Tao Z, Li J, Wang K (2019) Electrical resistivity and mechanical properties of cementitious composite incorporating conductive rubber fibres. Smart Mater Struct 28(8):85013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab282a10.1088/1361-665X/ab282a ↗
30. Zhang L, Ding S, Han B, Yu X, Ni Y (2019) Effect of water content on the piezoresistive property of smart cement-based materials with carbon nanotube/nanocarbon black composite filler. Compos A 119:8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.01.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2019.01.010 ↗
31. Wen S, Chung DDL (2007) Electrical-resistance-based damage self-sensing in carbon fiber reinforced cement. Carbon 45(4):710–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.11.02910.1016/j.carbon.2006.11.029 ↗
32. Chung DDL (2003) Damage in cement-based materials, studied by electrical resistance measurement. Mater Sci Eng R 42(1):1–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0927-796x(03)00037-810.1016/s0927-796x(03)00037-8 ↗
33. Ramirez M, Chung DDL (2016) Electromechanical, self-sensing and viscoelastic behavior of carbon fiber tows. Carbon 110:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.09510.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.095 ↗
34. Wang H, Liu J, Gao X, Li Y, Cai J, Wang J (2019) Influence of salt freeze-thaw cycles on the damage and the following electrical and self-sensing performance of carbon nanofibers concrete. Mater Res Express 6(2):025705/1–025705/11. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aaf09410.1088/2053-1591/aaf094 ↗
35. Alsaadi A, Meredith J, Swait T, Curiel-Sosa JL, Jia Y, Hayes S (2019) Structural health monitoring for woven fabric CFRP laminates. Compos B 174:107048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10704810.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107048 ↗
36. Wen S, Chung DDL (2006) Effects of strain and damage on the strain sensing ability of carbon fiber cement. J Mater Civ Eng 18(3):355–360. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2006)18:3(355)10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2006)18:3(355) ↗
37. Wang S, Kowalik DP, Chung DDL (2002) Effects of the temperature, humidity and stress on the interlaminar interface of carbon fiber polymer-matrix composites, studied by contact electrical resistivity measurement. J. Adhes 78(2):189–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/0021846021038410.1080/00218460210384 ↗
38. Wang S, Chung DDL (2005) The interlaminar interface of a carbon fiber epoxy–matrix composite as an impact sensor. J Mater Sci 40:1863–1867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-1205-710.1007/s10853-005-1205-7 ↗
39. Fu X, Chung DDL (1998) Effects of water-cement ratio, curing age, silica fume, polymer admixtures, steel surface treatments, and corrosion on bond between concrete and steel reinforcing bars. ACI Mater J 95(6):725–734. https://doi.org/10.14359/41710.14359/417 ↗
40. Kim KD, Chung DDL (2005) Electrically conductive adhesive and soldered joints under compression. J Adhes Sci Technol 19(11):1003–1023. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856105495098810.1163/1568561054950988 ↗
41. Wang S, Chung DDL (2006) Self-sensing of flexural strain and damage in carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite by electrical resistance measurement. Carbon 44(13):2739–2751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.03.03410.1016/j.carbon.2006.03.034 ↗
42. Zhu S, Chung DDL (2007) Analytical model of piezoresistivity for strain sensing in carbon fiber polymer-matrix structural composite under flexure. Carbon 45(8):1606–1613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2007.04.01210.1016/j.carbon.2007.04.012 ↗
43. Wen S, Chung DDL (2006) Self-sensing of flexural damage and strain in carbon fiber reinforced cement and effect of embedded steel reinforcing bars. Carbon 44(8):1496–1502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.12.00910.1016/j.carbon.2005.12.009 ↗
44. Zhu S, Chung DDL (2007) Theory of piezoresistivity for strain sensing in carbon fiber reinforced cement under flexure. J Mater Sci 42(15):6222–6233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1131-310.1007/s10853-006-1131-3 ↗
45. Ueda M, Yamaguchi T, Ohno T, Kato Y, Nishimura T (2019) FEM-aided identification of gauge factors of unidirectional CFRP through multi-point potential measurements. Adv Compos Mater 28(1):37–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243046.2017.142353110.1080/09243046.2017.1423531 ↗
46. Celebonovic V, Nikolic MG (2018) The Hubbard Model and piezoresistivity. J Low Temp Phys 190(3–4):191–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-017-1830-y10.1007/s10909-017-1830-y ↗
47. Nakamura K, Toriyama T, Sugiyama S (2011) First-principles simulation on piezoresistivity in alpha and beta silicon carbide nanosheets. Jpn J Appl Phys 50(6):06GE05/1–06GE05/6. https://doi.org/10.7567/jjap.50.06ge0510.7567/jjap.50.06ge05 ↗
48. Ren X, Burton J, Seidel GD, Lafdi K (2015) Computational multiscale modeling and characterization of piezoresistivity in fuzzy fiber reinforced polymer composites. Int J Solids Struct 54:121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.10.03410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.10.034 ↗
49. Hu B, Hu N, Li Y, Akagi K, Yuan W, Watanabe T, Cai Y (2012) Multi-scale numerical simulations on piezoresistivity of CNT/polymer nanocomposites. Nanoscale Res Lett 7(1):402, 11pp10.1186/1556-276X-7-402 ↗
50. Gong S, Wu D, Li Y, Jin M, Xiao T, Wang Y, Xiao Z, Zhu Z, Li Z (2018) Temperature-independent piezoresistive sensors based on carbon nanotube/polymer nanocomposite. Carbon 137:188–19510.1016/j.carbon.2018.05.029 ↗
51. Koo GM, Tallman TN (2020) Higher-order resistivity-strain relations for self-sensing nanocomposites subject to general deformations. Compos B 190:107907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10790710.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107907 ↗
52. Kim I, Kim HS, Ryu H (2019) Piezoresistivity of InAsP nanowires: role of crystal phases and phosphorus atoms in strain-induced channel conductances. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) 24(18):3249. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2418324910.3390/molecules24183249 ↗
53. Zhang T, Wang G, Wang C, Tang C, Zhang F, Luo Y (2019) Effect of AuNP-AuNP vdW interaction on the mechanics and piezoresistivity of AuNP-polymer nanocomposite. AIP Adv 9(5):055212/1–055212/8. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.509952310.1063/1.5099523 ↗
54. Wang M, Gurunathan R, Imasato K, Geisendorfer NR, Jakus AE, Peng J, Shah RN, Grayson M, Snyder GJ (2019) Percolation model for piezoresistivity in conductor-polymer composites. Adv Theory Simul. https://doi.org/10.1002/adts.20180012510.1002/adts.201800125 ↗
55. Oskouyi AB, Sundararaj U, Mertiny P (2014) Tunneling conductivity and piezoresistivity of composites containing randomly dispersed conductive nano-platelets. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 7(4):2501–2521. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma704250110.3390/ma7042501 ↗
56. Gbaguidi A, Namilae S, Kim D (2019) Stochastic percolation model for the effect of nanotube agglomeration on the conductivity and piezoresistivity of hybrid nanocomposites. Computat Mater Sci 166:9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.04.04510.1016/j.commatsci.2019.04.045 ↗
57. Oliva-Aviles AI, Aviles F, Seidel GD, Sosa V (2013) On the contribution of carbon nanotube deformation to piezoresistivity of carbon nanotube/polymer composites. Compos B 47:200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.09110.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.091 ↗
58. Ren X, Seidel GD (2013) Computational micromechanics modeling of inherent piezoresistivity in carbon nanotube-polymer nanocomposites. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 24(12):1459–1483. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X1247144210.1177/1045389X12471442 ↗
59. Gong S, Zhu ZH (2015) Giant piezoresistivity in aligned carbon nanotube nanocomposite: account for nanotube structural distortion at crossed tunnel junctions. Nanoscale 7(4):1339–1348. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR05656F10.1039/C4NR05656F ↗
60. Guan X, Wen M, Li H, Ou J (2019) The influence of firing procedures on strain sensitivity of thick-film resistors. Ceram Int 45(6):6836–6841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.12.17710.1016/j.ceramint.2018.12.177 ↗
61. Qiao Z, Ma Y, Chen X, Chen M, Hong K, Li Z, Lu G, Wang Z (2020) Mechanical and piezo-resistive properties of functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes/styrene-ethylene-butadiene-styrene composites. Polym Compos 41(5):2082–2093. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2552210.1002/pc.25522 ↗
62. Devarajan U, Singh S, Esakki Muthu S, Kalai Selvan G, Sivaprakash P, Roy Barman S, Arumugam S (2014) Investigations on the electronic transport and piezoresistivity properties of Ni2−xMn1+xGa (x = 0 and 0.15) Heusler alloys under hydrostatic pressure. Appl Phys Lett 105(25):252401/1–252401/410.1063/1.4904711 ↗
63. Sezen M, Register JT, Yao Y, Glisic B, Loo Y (2016) Eliminating piezoresistivity in flexible conducting polymers for accurate temperature sensing under dynamic mechanical deformations. Small 12(21):2832–2838. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20160085810.1002/smll.201600858 ↗
64. Jheng L, Hsiao C, Ko W, Hsu SL, Huang Y (2019) Conductive films based on sandwich structures of carbon nanotubes/silver nanowires for stretchable interconnects. Nanotechnology 30(23):235201. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab048310.1088/1361-6528/ab0483 ↗
65. Wang D, Chung DDL (2013) Through-thickness piezoresistivity in a carbon fiber polymer-matrix structural composite for electrical-resistance-based through-thickness strain sensing. Carbon 60(1):129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.00510.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.005 ↗
66. Wang X, Chung DDL (1997) Sensing delamination in a carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite during fatigue by electrical resistance measurement. Polym Compos 18(6):692–700. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.1032210.1002/pc.10322 ↗
67. Wang X, Chung DDL (1999) Fiber breakage in polymer-matrix composite during static and dynamic loading, studied by electrical resistance measurement. J Mater Res 14(11):4224–4229. https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-503-8110.1557/PROC-503-81 ↗
68. Lekawa-Raus A, Koziol KKK, Windle AH (2014) Piezoresistive effect in carbon nanotube fibers. ACS Nano 8(11):11214–11224. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn503596f10.1021/nn503596f ↗
69. Anike JC, Belay K, Abot JL (2019) Effect of twist on the electromechanical properties of carbon nanotube yarns. Carbon 142:491–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.06710.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.067 ↗
70. Su S, Chen Y, Wu J, Chen W, Cheng W, Yao YD (2006) The straining effect on tunneling resistance of Co/AlOx/Co/IrMn junctions. Appl Phys Lett 89(22):222510/1–222510/3. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.239993610.1063/1.2399936 ↗
71. Lange D, Roca-Cabarrocas P, Triantafyllidis N, Daineka D (2016) Piezoresistivity of thin film semiconductors with application to thin film silicon solar cells. Solar Energy Mater Solar Cells 145(Part_2):93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2015.09.01410.1016/j.solmat.2015.09.014 ↗
72. Thuau D, Begley K, Dilmurat R, Ablat A, Wantz G, Ayela C, Abbas M (2020) Exploring the critical thickness of organic semiconductor layer for enhanced piezoresistive sensitivity in field-effect transistor sensors. Materials (Basel, Switzerland) 13(7):1583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1307158310.3390/ma13071583 ↗
73. Thanh N, Toan D, Riduan Md FA, Hoang-Phuong P, Tuan-Khoa N, Nam-Trung N et al (2019) Giant piezoresistive effect by optoelectronic coupling in a heterojunction. Nat Commun 10(1):4139. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11965-510.1038/s41467-019-11965-5 ↗
74. Riyajuddin S, Kumar S, Gaur SP, Sud A, Maruyama T, Ali ME, Ghosh K (2020) Linear piezoresistive strain sensor based on graphene/g-C3N4/PDMS heterostructure. Nanotechnology 31(29):295501. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab7b8810.1088/1361-6528/ab7b88 ↗
75. Yao Y, Duan X, Luo J, Liu T (2017) Two-probe versus van der Pauw method in studying the piezoresistivity of single-wall carbon nanotube thin films. Nanotechnology 28(44):445501/1–445501/1010.1088/1361-6528/aa8585 ↗
76. Wen S, Chung DDL (2007) Piezoresistivity-based strain sensing in carbon fiber reinforced cement. ACI Mater J 104(2):171–179
77. Vipulanandan C, Mohammed A (2019) Smart cement compressive piezoresistive, stress-strain, and strength behavior with nanosilica modification. J Test Eval 47(2):1479–1501. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE2017010510.1520/JTE20170105 ↗
78. Wen S, Chung DDL (2006) Spatially resolved self-sensing of strain and damage in carbon fiber cement. J Mater Sci 41(15):4823–4831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0028-510.1007/s10853-006-0028-5 ↗
79. Wang D, Wang S, Chung DDL, Chung JH (2006) Sensitivity of the two-dimensional electric potential/resistance method for damage monitoring in carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite. J Mater Sci 41(15):4839–4846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0062-310.1007/s10853-006-0062-3 ↗
80. Zhang D, Ye L, Wang D, Tang Y, Mustapha S, Chen Y (2012) Assessment of transverse impact damage in GF/EP laminates of conductive nanoparticles using electrical resistivity tomography. Compos A 43(9):1587–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.04.01210.1016/j.compositesa.2012.04.012 ↗
81. Karhunen K, Seppaenen A, Lehikoinen A, Monteiro PJM, Kaipio JP (2010) Electrical resistance tomography imaging of concrete. Cem Concr Res 40(1):137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.08.02310.1016/j.cemconres.2009.08.023 ↗
82. Reichling K, Raupach M, Klitzsch N (2015) Determination of the distribution of electrical resistivity in reinforced concrete structures using electrical resistivity tomography. Mater Corros 66(8):763–771. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.20140776310.1002/maco.201407763 ↗
83. Wen S, Chung DDL (2001) Electric polarization in carbon fiber reinforced cement. Cem Concr Res 31(2):141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00382-310.1016/S0008-8846(00)00382-3 ↗
84. Cao J, Chung DDL (2004) Electric polarization and depolarization in cement-based materials, studied by apparent electrical resistance measurement. Cem Concr Res 34(3):481–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.09.00310.1016/j.cemconres.2003.09.003 ↗
85. Fu X, Ma E, Chung DDL, Anderson WA (1997) Self-monitoring in carbon fiber reinforced mortar by reactance measurement. Cem Concr Res 27(6):845–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(97)83277-210.1016/S0008-8846(97)83277-2 ↗
86. Shirodkar N, Rocker S, Seidel GD (2019) Strain and damage sensing of polymer bonded mock energetics via piezoresistivity from carbon nanotube networks. Smart Mater Struct 28(10):104006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab3dcd10.1088/1361-665X/ab3dcd ↗
87. Vipulanandan C, Mohammed A (2017) Rheological properties of piezoresistive smart cement slurry modified with iron- oxide nanoparticles for oil–well applications. J Test Eval 45(6):2050–2060. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE2015044310.1520/JTE20150443 ↗
88. Sanli A, Kanoun O (2020) Electrical impedance analysis of carbon nanotube/epoxy nanocomposite-based piezoresistive strain sensors under uniaxial cyclic static tensile loading. J Compos Mater 54(6):845–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831987059210.1177/0021998319870592 ↗
89. Dong W, Li W, Shen L, Sheng D (2019) Piezoresistive behaviours of carbon black cement-based sensors with layer-distributed conductive rubber fibres. Mater Des 182:108012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10801210.1016/j.matdes.2019.108012 ↗
90. Cheng X, Wang L, Gao F, Yang W, Du Z, Chen D, Chen S (2019) The N and P co-doping-induced giant negative piezoresistance behaviors of SiC nanowires. J Mater Chem C 7(11):3181–3189. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TC06623J10.1039/C8TC06623J ↗
91. Patole SP, Reddy SK, Schiffer A, Askar K, Prusty BG, Kumar S (2019) Piezoresistive and mechanical characteristics of graphene foam nanocomposites. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2(3):1402–1411. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.8b0230610.1021/acsanm.8b02306 ↗
92. Wang F, Zhang S, Wang L, Zhang Y, Lin J, Zhang X, Chen T, Lai Y, Pan G, Sun L (2018) An ultrahighly sensitive and repeatable flexible pressure sensor based on PVDF/PU/MWCNT hierarchical framework-structured aerogels for monitoring human activities. J Mater Chem C 6(46):12575–12583. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TC04652B10.1039/C8TC04652B ↗
93. Fu Y, Li Y, Liu Y, Huang P, Hu N, Fu S (2018) High-performance structural flexible strain sensors based on graphene-coated glass fabric/silicone composite. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10(41):35503–35509. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b0942410.1021/acsami.8b09424 ↗
94. Yu S, Wang X, Xiang H, Zhu L, Tebyetekerwa M, Zhu M (2018) Superior piezoresistive strain sensing behaviors of carbon nanotubes in one-dimensional polymer fiber structure. Carbon 140:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.02810.1016/j.carbon.2018.08.028 ↗
95. Cruz S, Rocha LA, Viana JC (2017) Piezo-resistive behavior at high strain levels of PEDOT:PSS printed on a flexible polymeric substrate by a novel surface treatment. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 28(3):2563–2573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-5832-310.1007/s10854-016-5832-3 ↗
96. Li X, Chen S, Ying P, Gao F, Liu Q, Shang M, Yang W (2016) A giant negative piezoresistance effect in 3C-SiC nanowires with B dopants. J Mater Chem C 4(27):6466–6472. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TC01882C10.1039/C6TC01882C ↗
97. Zhao S, Li J, Cao D, Gao Y, Huang W, Zhang G, Sun R, Wong C (2016) Percolation threshold-inspired design of hierarchical multiscale hybrid architectures based on carbon nanotubes and silver nanoparticles for stretchable and printable electronics. J Mater Chem C 4(27):6666–6674. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TC01728B10.1039/C6TC01728B ↗
98. Zhang L, Wang Y, Wei Y, Xu W, Fang D, Zhai L, Lin K, An L (2008) A silicon carbonitride ceramic with anomalously high piezoresistivity. J Am Ceram Soc 91(4):1346–1349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02275.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02275.x ↗
99. Wang S, Chung DDL (2000) Piezoresistivity in continuous carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite. Polym Compos 21(1):13–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.1016010.1002/pc.10160 ↗
100. Wang S, Wang D, Chung DDL, Chung JH (2006) Method of sensing impact damage in carbon fiber polymer-matrix composite by electrical resistance measurement. J Mater Sci 41(8):2281–2289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-7172-910.1007/s10853-006-7172-9 ↗