journal article·2013-08

The influence of electrospinning parameters on the morphology and diameter of poly(vinyledene fluoride) nanofibers- effect of sodium chloride

K. P. Matabola, R. M. Moutloali

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 48· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

Electrospinning was used to produce PVDF nonwoven fiber mats under varying parameters of polymer concentration, applied voltage, salt content, and spinning distance. The results indicated that both the polymer and salt concentration had a noteworthy influence on both the morphology and diameter of the nanofibers. Improved fiber morphology and increased PVDF fiber diameter were observed as the PVDF concentration was increased. Adding different concentrations of NaCl to the PVDF polymer solution resulted in improved electrospinnability of PVDF resulting in better morphology and with increasing salt content, smaller fiber diameter. In particular increasing the salt content led to well defined fibers in otherwise nonfiber-producing formulations. The applied voltage and spinning distance were also seen to have an influence on the properties of the PVDF nanofibers. Nanofibers without beads were formed under the improved conditions of the different parameters studied.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Daels N, De Vrieze S, Sampers I, Decostere B, Westbroek P, Dumoulin A, Dejans P, De Clerk K, Van Hulle SWH (2011) Desalination 275:28510.1016/j.desal.2011.03.012 ↗
2. De Vrieze S, van Camp T, Nelvig A, Hagstrom B, Westbroek P, De Clerck K (2009) J Mater Sci 44:1357. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-3010-610.1007/s10853-008-3010-6 ↗
3. Botes M, Cloete TE (2007) Crit Rev Microbiol 36:6810.3109/10408410903397332 ↗
4. Smit E, Buttner U, Sanderson RD (2005) Polymer 46:241910.1016/j.polymer.2005.02.002 ↗
5. Huang ZM, Zhang YZ, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S (2003) Compos Sci Technol 63:222310.1016/S0266-3538(03)00178-7 ↗
6. Formhals A (2003) US Patent 1,975,504
7. Melechko AV, Guillorn MA, Lowndes DH, Simpson ML (2002) Appl Phys Lett 80:481610.1063/1.1487920 ↗
8. Ding W, Wei S, Zhu J, Chen X, Rutman D, Guo Z (2010) Macromol Mater Eng 295:95810.1002/mame.201000188 ↗
9. Jacobs V, Anandjiwala RD, Maaza M (2010) J Appl Polym Sci 115:313010.1002/app.31396 ↗
10. Srinivasan G, Reneker DH (1995) Polym Int 36:19510.1002/pi.1995.210360210 ↗
11. Reneker DH, Chun I (1996) Nanotechnology 7:21610.1088/0957-4484/7/3/009 ↗
12. Yarin AL, Koombhongse RenekerDH (2001) J Appl Phys 89:301510.1063/1.1333035 ↗
13. Jin H, Du X, Jiang Y (2009) Proc of SPIE 7508:750814. doi: 10.1117/12.83791810.1117/12.837918 ↗
14. Cozza ES, Monticelli O, Marsano E, Cebe P (2012) Polym Int. doi: 10.1002/pi.4314
15. Gopal R, Kaur S, Ma Z, Chan C, Ramakrishna S, Matsuura T (2006) J Memb Sci 281:58110.1016/j.memsci.2006.04.026 ↗
16. Liao Y, Wang R, Tian M, Qiu C, Fane AG (2013) J Memb Sci 425–426:3010.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.023 ↗
17. Zong X, Kim K, Fang D, Ran S, Chu B (2002) Polymer 43:440310.1016/S0032-3861(02)00275-6 ↗
18. Arayanarakul K, Choktaweesap N, Aht-ong D, Meechaisue C, Supaphol P (2006) Macromol Mater Eng 291:58110.1002/mame.200500419 ↗
19. Deitzel JM, Kleinmeyer J, Beck HarrisD, Tan NC (2001) Polymer 42:26110.1016/S0032-3861(00)00250-0 ↗
20. Fong H, Chun I, Reneker DH (2000) Polymer 40:458510.1016/S0032-3861(99)00068-3 ↗
21. Jin H, Du X, Jiang Y (2009) Proc of SPIE 7508:750814. doi: 10.1117/12.83791810.1117/12.837918 ↗
22. Sill TJ, von Recum HA (2008) Biomater 29:1989. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.01.01110.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.01.011 ↗
23. Subbiah T, Bhat GS, Tock RW, Parameswaran S, Ramakrishna SS (2005) J Appl Polym Sci 96:55710.1002/app.21481 ↗
24. Choi SS, Lee YS, Joo CW, Lee SG, Park J, Hang KH (2004) Elect Acta 50:33910.1016/j.electacta.2004.03.057 ↗
25. Zhao Z, Zhang J, Wang M, Zhang H, Han CC (2012) J Memb Sci 394–395:20910.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.043 ↗
26. Yee WA, Kotaki M, Liu Y, Lu X (2007) Polymer 48:51210.1016/j.polymer.2006.11.036 ↗
27. Li Q, Jia Z, Yang Y, Wang L, Guan Z (2007) Proc of IEEE internat conf solid Dielec. doi: 10.1109/ICSD.2007.4290790
28. Wang T, Kumar S (2006) J Appl Polym Sci 102:102310.1002/app.24123 ↗
29. Zhang C, Yuan X, Wu L, Han Y, Sheng J (2005) Eur Polym J 41:42310.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.10.027 ↗
30. Ziabari M, Mottaghitalag V, Haghi AK (2010) Kor J Chem Eng 27:34010.1007/s11814-009-0309-1 ↗
31. Sui X, Wiesel E, Dagner EH (2011) J Nanosci Nanotechnol 11:7931–793610.1166/jnn.2011.4760 ↗
32. Wright LD, Andric T, Freeman JW (2011) Mater Sci Eng C 31:3010.1016/j.msec.2010.02.001 ↗
33. Wang Y, Wang B, Wang G, Yin T, Yu Q (2009) Polym Bull 63:25910.1007/s00289-009-0078-3 ↗