journal article·2010-03

The toughness of epoxy polymers and fibre composites modified with rubber microparticles and silica nanoparticles

T. H. Hsieh, A. J. Kinloch, K. Masania, J. Sohn Lee, A. C. Taylor, S. Sprenger

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 45· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

The present paper investigates the effect of adding silica nanoparticles to an anhydride-cured epoxy polymer in bulk and when used as the matrix of carbon- and glass-fibre reinforced composites. The formation of ‘hybrid’ epoxy polymers, containing both silica nanoparticles and carboxyl-terminated butadiene-acrylonitrile (CTBN) rubber microparticles, is also discussed. The structure/property relationships are considered, with an emphasis on the toughness and the toughening mechanisms. The fracture energy of the bulk epoxy polymer was increased from 77 to 212 J/m2 by the presence of 20 wt% of silica nanoparticles. The observed toughening mechanisms that were operative were (a) plastic shear-yield bands, and (b) debonding of the matrix from the silica nanoparticles, followed by plastic void-growth of the epoxy. The largest increases in toughness observed were for the ‘hybrid’ materials. Here a maximum fracture energy of 965 J/m2 was measured for a ‘hybrid’ epoxy polymer containing 9 wt% and 15 wt% of the rubber microparticles and silica nanoparticles, respectively. Most noteworthy was the observation that these increases in the toughness of the bulk polymers were found to be transferred to the fibre composites. Indeed, the interlaminar fracture energies for the fibre-composite materials were increased even further by a fibre-bridging toughening mechanism. The present work also extends an existing model to predict the toughening effect of the nanoparticles in a thermoset polymer. There was excellent agreement between the predictions and the experimental data for the epoxy containing the silica nanoparticles, and for epoxy polymers containing micrometre-sized glass particles. The latter, relatively large, glass particles were investigated to establish whether a ‘nano-effect’, with respect to increasing the toughness of the epoxy bulk polymers, did indeed exist.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (79)

Show source-provided references
1. Broutman LJ, Sahu S (1971) Mater Sci Eng 8:9810.1016/0025-5416(71)90087-5 ↗
2. Spanoudakis J, Young RJ (1984) J Mater Sci 19:473. doi: 10.1007/BF0055357110.1007/BF02403234 ↗
3. McGrath LM, Parnas RS, Lenhart JL, King S (2006) Polym Mater Sci Eng 94:683
4. Griffiths R, Holloway D (1970) J Mater Sci 5:302. doi: 10.1007/BF0239778110.1007/BF02397781 ↗
5. Dixon DG, Harris SJ, Dempster M, Nicholls P (1998) J Adhesion 65:13110.1080/00218469808012243 ↗
6. Kinloch AJ, Taylor AC (2002) J Mater Sci 37:433. doi: 10.1023/A:1013735103120433-46010.1023/A:1013735103120 ↗
7. Lin K-F, Shieh Y-D (1998) J Appl Polym Sci 70:231310.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981219)70:12<2313::AID-APP2>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
8. Kim DS, Cho K, Kim JK, Park CE (1996) Polym Eng Sci 36:75510.1002/pen.10463 ↗
9. Drake RS, Siebert AR (1975) SAMPE Quart 6:11
10. Kinloch AJ, Shaw SJ, Tod DA, Hunston DL (1983) Polymer 24:134110.1016/0032-3861(83)90070-8 ↗
11. Yee AF, Pearson RA (1986) J Mater Sci 21:2462. doi: 10.1007/BF0111429310.1007/BF01114293 ↗
12. Bucknall CB, Partridge IK (1983) Polymer 24:63910.1016/0032-3861(83)90120-9 ↗
13. Kinloch AJ, Yuen ML, Jenkins SD (1994) J Mater Sci 29:3781. doi: 10.1007/BF0035734910.1007/BF00357349 ↗
14. Bucknall CB, Gilbert AH (1989) Polymer 30:21310.1016/0032-3861(89)90107-9 ↗
15. Johnsen BB, Kinloch AJ, Taylor AC (2005) Polymer 46:735210.1016/j.polymer.2005.05.151 ↗
16. Kinloch AJ, Finch CA, Hashemi S (1987) Polym Comm 28:322
17. Pearson RA, Yee AF (1989) J Mater Sci 24:2571. doi: 10.1007/BF0117452810.1007/BF01174528 ↗
18. Liang YL, Pearson RA (2009) Polymer 50:489510.1016/j.polymer.2009.08.014 ↗
19. Kim JK, Baillie C, Poh J, Mai YW (1992) Composites Sci Tech 43:28310.1016/0266-3538(92)90099-O ↗
20. Gilchrist MD, Svensson N (1995) Composites Sci Tech 55:19510.1016/0266-3538(95)00099-2 ↗
21. Kinloch AJ, Mohammed RD, Taylor AC, Sprenger S, Egan D (2006) J Mater Sci 41:5043. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0130-810.1007/s10853-006-0130-8 ↗
22. Kinloch AJ, Lee JH, Taylor AC, Sprenger S, Eger C, Egan D (2003) J Adhesion 79:86710.1080/00218460309551 ↗
23. Blackman BRK, Kinloch AJ, Sohn Lee J, Taylor AC, Agarwal R, Schueneman G, Sprenger S (2007) J Mater Sci 42:7049. doi: 10.1007/s10853-007-1768-610.1007/s10853-007-1768-6 ↗
24. Johnsen BB, Kinloch AJ, Mohammed RD, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2007) Polymer 48:53010.1016/j.polymer.2006.11.038 ↗
25. Kinloch AJ, Mohammed RD, Taylor AC, Eger C, Sprenger S, Egan D (2005) J Mater Sci 40:5083. doi: 10.1007/s10853-005-1716-210.1007/s10853-005-1716-2 ↗
26. BS-EN-2564 (1998) Carbon fibre laminates—Determination of the fibre, resin and void contents. BSI, London
27. BS-EN-ISO-527-2 (1996) Plastics—Determination of tensile properties—Part 2: test conditions for moulding and extrusion plastics. BSI, London
28. Williams JG, Ford H (1964) J Mech Eng Sci 6:40510.1243/JMES_JOUR_1964_006_055_02 ↗
29. ISO-13586 (2000) Plastics-determination of fracture toughness (GIC and KIC)—linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) approach. ISO, Geneva
30. ASTM-D5528 (2001) Standard test method for mode I interlaminar fracture toughness of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. ASTM, West Conshohocken
31. Sue HJ (1991) Polym Eng Sci 31:27010.1002/pen.760310410 ↗
32. Sue HJ, Yee AF (1993) J Mater Sci 28:2975. doi: 10.1007/BF0035470210.1007/BF00354702 ↗
33. Pearson RA, Yee AF (1991) J Mater Sci 26:3828. doi: 10.1007/BF0118497910.1007/BF01184979 ↗
34. Baller J, Becker N, Ziehmer M, Thomassey M, Zielinski B, Müller U, Sanctuary R (2009) Polymer 50:321110.1016/j.polymer.2009.05.020 ↗
35. Fox TG (1956) Bull Am Phys Soc 1:123
36. Mohammed RD (2007) PhD in Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine, London
37. Lee JH (2006) PhD in Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine, London
38. Goodfellow Product Catalogue (2005) Goodfellow, Huntingdon
39. Pascoe KJ (1978) An introduction to the properties of engineering materials. Van Nostrand Reinhold, London10.1007/978-94-011-7068-0 ↗
40. Kerner EH (1956) Proc Phys Soc B 69:80810.1088/0370-1301/69/8/305 ↗
41. Nielsen LE (1966) J Appl Polym Sci 10:9710.1002/app.1966.070100107 ↗
42. Halpin JC, Pagano NJ (1969) J Composite Mater 3:72010.1177/002199836900300416 ↗
43. Halpin JC (1969) J Composite Mater 3:73210.1177/002199836900300419 ↗
44. Halpin JC, Kardos JL (1976) Polym Eng Sci 16:34410.1002/pen.760160512 ↗
45. Vollenberg PHT, Heikens D (1989) Polymer 30:165610.1016/0032-3861(89)90326-1 ↗
46. Lewis TB, Nielsen LE (1970) J Appl Polym Sci 14:144910.1002/app.1970.070140604 ↗
47. McGee S, McCullough RL (1981) Polym Compos 2:14910.1002/pc.750020403 ↗
48. Nielsen LE, Landel RF (1994) Mechanical properties of polymers and composites. Marcel Dekker, New York
49. Nielsen LE (1968) J Composite Mater 2:12010.1177/002199836800200111 ↗
50. Pearson RA, Yee AF (1986) J Mater Sci 21:2475. doi: 10.1007/BF0111429410.1007/BF01114294 ↗
51. Andrews EH (1968) Fracture in polymers. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh
52. Kinloch AJ (1986) In: Kinloch AJ (ed) Structural adhesives—Developments in resins and primers. Applied Science Publishers, London
53. Karger-Kocsis J, Friedrich K (1992) Colloid Polym Sci 270:54910.1007/BF00658286 ↗
54. Cheng C, Hiltner A, Baer E, Soskey PR, Mylonakis SG (1995) J Mater Sci 30:587. doi: 10.1007/BF0035631510.1007/BF00356315 ↗
55. Azimi HR, Pearson RA, Hertzberg RW (1996) Polym Eng Sci 36:235210.1002/pen.10633 ↗
56. Chen TK, Jan YH (1992) J Mater Sci 27:111. doi: 10.1007/BF0055384510.1007/BF02403652 ↗
57. Hunston DL, Moulton RJ, Johnston NJ, Bascom WD (1985) In: Johnston NJ (ed) Toughened composites. ASTM, Philadelphia
58. Sue HJ, Yee AF (1989) J Mater Sci 24:1447. doi: 10.1007/BF0239708510.1007/BF02397085 ↗
59. Bagheri R, Pearson RA (1996) J Mater Sci 31:3945. doi: 10.1007/BF0035265510.1007/BF00352655 ↗
60. Bagheri R, Pearson RA (1995) J Appl Polym Sci 58:42710.1002/app.1995.070580221 ↗
61. Caddell RM (1980) Deformation and fracture of solids. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
62. Lee J, Yee AF (2000) Polymer 41:837510.1016/S0032-3861(00)00186-5 ↗
63. Kawaguchi T, Pearson RA (2003) Polymer 44:423910.1016/S0032-3861(03)00372-0 ↗
64. Kinloch AJ (1987) Adhesion and adhesives: science and technology. Chapman & Hall, London10.1007/978-94-015-7764-9 ↗
65. Norman DA, Robertson RE (2003) Polymer 44:235110.1016/S0032-3861(03)00084-3 ↗
66. Huang Y, Kinloch AJ (1992) J Mater Sci 27:2753. doi: 10.1007/BF0054070210.1007/BF00540702 ↗
67. Huang Y, Kinloch AJ (1992) J Mater Sci 27:2763. doi: 10.1007/BF0054070310.1007/BF00540703 ↗
68. Evans AG, Williams S, Beaumont PWR (1985) J Mater Sci 20:3668. doi: 10.1007/BF0111377410.1007/BF01113774 ↗
69. Dekkers MEJ, Heikens D (1984) J Mater Sci 19:3271. doi: 10.1007/BF0054981410.1007/BF00549814 ↗
70. Dekkers MEJ, Heikens D (1985) J Mater Sci 20:3873. doi: 10.1007/BF0055237510.1007/BF00552375 ↗
71. Sultan JN, McGarry FJ (1973) Polym Eng Sci 13:2910.1002/pen.760130105 ↗
72. Guild FJ, Young RJ (1989) J Mater Sci 24:298. doi: 10.1007/BF0066097110.1007/BF00660971 ↗
73. Guild FJ, Young RJ (1989) J Mater Sci 24:2454. doi: 10.1007/BF0117451110.1007/BF01174511 ↗
74. Kinloch AJ, Young RJ (1983) Fracture behaviour of polymers. Applied Science Publishers, London
75. Lee J, Yee AF (2000) Polymer 41:836310.1016/S0032-3861(00)00187-7 ↗
76. Green DJ, Nicholson PS, Embury JD (1979) J Mater Sci 14:1657. doi: 10.1007/BF0056928710.1007/BF00569287 ↗
77. Faber KT, Evans AG (1983) Acta Metall 31:56510.1016/0001-6160(83)90046-9 ↗
78. Sun CJ, Saffari P, Sadeghipour K, Baran G (2005) Mater Sci Eng A 405:28710.1016/j.msea.2005.06.032 ↗
79. Pukanszky B, Voros G (1996) Polym Compos 17:38410.1002/pc.10625 ↗