journal article·2009-03

The effect of temperature and humidity on electrospinning

S. De Vrieze, T. Van Camp, A. Nelvig, B. Hagström, P. Westbroek, K. De Clerck

Journal of Materials Science· Volume 44· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Electrospinning is a process that generates nanofibres. Temperature and humidity affect this process. In this article the influence of humidity and temperature on the formation and the properties of nanofibres are studied using cellulose acetate (CA) and poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) as target materials. The experiments indicate that two major parameters are dependent of temperature and have their influence on the average fibre diameter. A first parameter is the solvent evaporation rate that increases with increasing temperature. The second parameter is the viscosity of the polymer solution that decreases with increasing temperature. The trend in variation of the average nanofibre diameter as a function of humidity is different for CA and PVP, which can be explained by variations in chemical and molecular interaction and its influence on the solvent evaporation rate. As the humidity increases, the average fibre diameter of the CA nanofibres increases, whilst for PVP the average diameter decreases. The average diameter of nanofibres made by electrospinning change significantly through variation of temperature and humidity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Formhals A (1934) Process and apparatus for preparing artificial threads. US Patent 1,975,504
2. Miqin Z (2007) Alginate-based nanofibers and related scaffolds. US Patent WO2007112446
3. De Vrieze S et al (2007) J Mater Sci 42:8029. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-1485-610.1007/s10853-006-1485-6 ↗
4. Frenot A et al (2007) J Appl Polym Sci 103:147310.1002/app.24912 ↗
5. Gibson PW et al (1999) AICHE J 45:19010.1002/aic.690450116 ↗
6. Aussawasathien D, Dong JH, Dai L (2005) Synth Met 154:37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2005.07.01810.1016/j.synthmet.2005.07.018 ↗
7. Jin WJ et al (2007) Synth Met 157:45410.1016/j.synthmet.2007.05.011 ↗
8. Yang Y et al (2006) IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 13:58010.1109/TDEI.2006.1657971 ↗
9. Tripatanasuwan S, Zhong Z, Reneker D (2007) Polymer (Guildf) 48:5742. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2007.07.04510.1016/j.polymer.2007.07.045 ↗
10. Givens SR et al (2007) Macromolecules 40:60810.1021/ma062398a ↗
11. Wang C et al (2007) Macromolecules 40:797310.1021/ma070508n ↗
12. Thompson CJ et al (2007) Polymer 48:691310.1016/j.polymer.2007.09.017 ↗
13. Yang QB et al (2004) J Polym Sci Part B-Polym Phys 42:372110.1002/polb.20222 ↗
14. Tungprapa S et al (2007) Cellulose 14:56310.1007/s10570-007-9113-4 ↗
15. Lin K et al (2007) Polymer 48:638410.1016/j.polymer.2007.08.056 ↗
16. Greenspan L (1977) J Res Natl Bur Stand 81A:8910.6028/jres.081A.011 ↗
17. Casper L et al (2004) Macromolecules 37:57310.1021/ma0351975 ↗
18. Dalton J (1802) Mem Lit Philos Soc 5:535
19. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 44th edn, pp 2582–2584