The Hall–Petch and inverse Hall–Petch relations and the hardness of nanocrystalline metals
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We review some of the factors that influence the hardness of polycrystalline materials with grain sizes less than 1 µm. The fundamental physical mechanisms that govern the hardness of nanocrystalline materials are discussed. The recently proposed dislocation curvature model for grain size-dependent strengthening and the 60-year-old Hall–Petch relationship are compared. For grains less than 30 nm in size, there is evidence for a transition from dislocation-based plasticity to grain boundary sliding, rotation, or diffusion as the main mechanism responsible for hardness. The evidence surrounding the inverse Hall–Petch phenomenon is found to be inconclusive due to processing artefacts, grain growth effects, and errors associated with the conversion of hardness to yield strength in nanocrystalline materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (89)
Show source-provided references
1. Gouldstone A, Chollacoop N, Dao M, Li J, Minor AM, Shen Y-L (2007) Indentation across size scales and disciplines: recent developments in experimentation and modeling. Acta Mater 55:4015–403910.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.044 ↗
2. Brooks I, Lin P, Palumbo G, Hibbard GD, Erb U (2008) Analysis of hardness-tensile strength relationships for electroformed nanocrystalline materials. Mater Sci Eng, A 491:412–41910.1016/j.msea.2008.02.015 ↗
3. Zhang P, Li SX, Zhang ZF (2011) General relationship between strength and hardness. Mater Sci Eng, A 529:62–7310.1016/j.msea.2011.08.061 ↗
4. Unwin WC, Longridge M (1918) The experimental study of the mechanical properties of materials. Proc Inst Mech Eng 95:405–43910.1243/PIME_PROC_1918_095_005_02 ↗
5. Norbury AL, Samuel T (1924) Experiments on the Brinell–tensile relationship. J Iron Steel Inst 109:479–491
6. Greaves RH, Jones JA (1926) The ratio of the tensile strength of steel to the Brinell hardness number. J Iron Steel Inst 113:335–353
7. Ruffle TW (1944) Relationship of Brinell hardness and yield stress in certain cast steels. Proc Inst Br Foundrym 37:A117–A121
8. Tabor D (1951) The hardness of metals. Clarendon Press, Oxford
9. Walley SM (2012) Historical origins of indentation hardness testing. Mater Sci Technol 28:1028–104410.1179/1743284711Y.0000000127 ↗
10. Walley SM (2013) Addendum and correction to ‘Historical origins of indentation hardness testing’. Mater Sci Technol 29:114810.1179/0267083613Z.000000000477 ↗
11. Hall EO (1951) The deformation and ageing of mild steel. 3: discussion of results. Proc Phys Soc Lond B 64:747–75310.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303 ↗
12. Petch NJ (1953) The cleavage strength of polycrystals. J Iron Steel Inst 174:25–28
13. Armstrong RW (2014) 60 years of Hall–Petch: past to present nanoscale connections. Mater Trans 55:2–1210.2320/matertrans.MA201302 ↗
14. Cordero ZC, Knight BE, Schuh CA (2016) Six decades of the Hall–Petch effect: a survey of grain-size strengthening studies on pure metals. Int Mater Rev 61:495–51210.1080/09506608.2016.1191808 ↗
15. Li Y, Bushby AJ, Dunstan DJ (2016) The Hall–Petch effect as a manifestation of the general size effect. Proc R Soc A 472:2015089010.1098/rspa.2015.0890 ↗
16. Holden AN, Hollomon JH (1949) Homogeneous yielding of carburized and nitrided single iron crystals. J Met 1:179–185
17. Gleiter H (1989) Nanocrystalline materials. Prog Mater Sci 33:223–31510.1016/0079-6425(89)90001-7 ↗
18. Meyers MA, Mishra A, Benson DJ (2006) Mechanical properties of nanocrystalline materials. Prog Mater Sci 51:427–55610.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
19. Pande CS, Cooper KP (2009) Nanomechanics of Hall–Petch relationship in nanocrystalline materials. Prog Mater Sci 54:689–70610.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.03.008 ↗
20. Veprek S, Mukherjee S, Karvankova P, Mannling HD, He JL, Moto K, Prochazka J, Argon AS (2003) Limits to the strength of super- and ultrahard nanocomposite coatings. J Vac Sci Technol, A 21:532–54410.1116/1.1558586 ↗
21. Brookes CA (1992) Indentation hardness, plasticity and creep of diamond. In: Field JE (ed) The properties of natural and synthetic diamond. Academic, London, pp 515–546
22. Balasubramanian N, Langdon TG (2016) The strength-grain size relationship in ultrafine-grained metals. Metall Mater Trans A 47:5827–583810.1007/s11661-016-3499-2 ↗
23. Koch CC (2007) Structural nanocrystalline materials: an overview. J Mater Sci 42:1403–1414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0609-310.1007/s10853-006-0609-3 ↗
24. Koch CC, Ovidko IA, Seal S, Veprek S (2007) Structural nanocrystalline materials: fundamentals and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511618840 ↗
25. Chokshi AH, Rosen A, Karch J, Gleiter H (1989) On the validity of the Hall–Petch relationship in nanocrystalline materials. Scr Metall Mater 23:1679–168410.1016/0036-9748(89)90342-6 ↗
26. Koch CC, Narayan J (2000) The inverse Hall–Petch effect: fact or artifact? Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 634:paper B.5.1
27. Schiøtz J, Jacobsen KW (2003) A maximum in the strength of nanocrystalline copper. Science 301:1357–135910.1126/science.1086636 ↗
28. Huang C, Peng XH, Zhao YB, Weng SY, Yang B, Fu T (2018) Flow strength limit of nanocrystalline tantalum predicted with molecular dynamics simulations. Mater Sci Eng, A 738:1–910.1016/j.msea.2018.09.053 ↗
29. Xu WW, Davila LP (2018) Tensile nanomechanics and the Hall–Petch effect in nanocrystalline aluminium. Mater Sci Eng, A 710:413–41810.1016/j.msea.2017.10.021 ↗
30. Kuhr BR, Aifantis KE (2019) Interpreting the inverse Hall–Petch relationship and capturing segregation hardening by measuring the grain boundary yield stress through MD indentation. Mater Sci Eng, A 745:107–11410.1016/j.msea.2018.12.053 ↗
31. Armstrong RW (2016) Dislocation pile-ups, material strength levels, and thermal activation. Metall Mater Trans A 47:5801–581010.1007/s11661-015-3161-4 ↗
32. Carsley JE, Ning J, Milligan WW, Hackney SA, Aifantis EC (1995) A simple mixtures-based model for the grain size dependence of strength in nanophase metals. Nanostruct Mater 5:441–44810.1016/0965-9773(95)00257-F ↗
33. Carsley JE, Fisher A, Milligan WW, Aifantis EC (1998) Mechanical behavior of a bulk nanostructured iron alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 29:2261–227110.1007/s11661-998-0104-3 ↗
34. Conrad H (2004) Grain-size dependence of the flow stress of copper from millimeters to nanometers. Metall Mater Trans A 35:2681–269510.1007/s11661-004-0214-5 ↗
35. Gurrutxaga-Lerma B (2019) A stochastic study of the collective effect of random distributions of dislocations. J Mech Phys Solids 124:10–3410.1016/j.jmps.2018.10.001 ↗
36. Gurrutxaga-Lerma B, Balint DS, Dini D, Eakins DE, Sutton AP (2013) A dynamic discrete dislocation plasticity method for the simulation of plastic relaxation under shock loading. Proc R Soc A 469:2013014110.1098/rspa.2013.0141 ↗
37. Gurrutxaga-Lerma B, Balint DS, Dini D, Eakins DE, Sutton AP (2014) Dynamic discrete dislocation plasticity. Adv Appl Mech 47:193–224
38. Frank FC, Read WT (1950) Multiplication processes for slow moving dislocations. Phys Rev 79:722–72310.1103/PhysRev.79.722 ↗
39. Hughes GD, Smith SD, Pande CS, Johnson HR, Armstrong RW (1986) Hall–Petch strengthening for the microhardness of 12 nm grain diameter electrodeposited nickel. Scr Metall 20:93–9710.1016/0036-9748(86)90219-X ↗
40. Torrents A, Yang H, Mohamed FA (2010) Effect of annealing on hardness and the modulus of elasticity in bulk nanocrystalline nickel. Metall Mater Trans A 41:621–63010.1007/s11661-009-0147-0 ↗
41. Pande CS, Masamura RA, Armstrong RW (1993) Pile-up based Hall–Petch relation for nanoscale materials. Nanostruct Mater 2:323–33110.1016/0965-9773(93)90159-9 ↗
42. Pande CS, Masumura RA (1996) A model for flow stress dependence on grain size for nanocrystalline solids. In: Suryanarayana C, Singh J, Froes FH (eds) Processing and properties of nanocrystalline materials. The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, Warrendale, pp 387–397
43. Pande CS, Masumura RA (2005) Grain growth and deformation in nanocrystalline materials. Mater Sci Eng, A 409:125–13010.1016/j.msea.2005.04.058 ↗
44. Armstrong RW (2013) Hall–Petch analysis of dislocation pileups in thin material layers and in nanopolycrystals. J Mater Res 28:1792–179810.1557/jmr.2013.10 ↗
45. Choi HJ, Lee SW, Park JS, Bae DH (2009) Positive deviation from a Hall–Petch relation in nanocrystalline aluminum. Mater Trans 50:640–64310.2320/matertrans.MRA2008343 ↗
46. Armstrong RW (2016) Hall–Petch description of nanopolycrystalline copper, nickel and aluminum strength levels and strain rate sensitivities. Philos Mag 96:3097–310810.1080/14786435.2016.1225168 ↗
47. Li JCM, Liu GCT (1967) Circular dislocation pileups. 1: strength of ultrafine polycrystalline aggregates. Philos Mag 15:1059–106310.1080/14786436708221653 ↗
48. Lu L, Chen X, Huang X, Lu K (2009) Revealing the maximum strength in nanotwinned copper. Science 323:607–61010.1126/science.1167641 ↗
49. Armstrong RW, Smith TR (1996) Dislocation pile-up predictions for the strength properties of ultrafine grain size fcc metals. In: Suryanarayana C, Singh J, Froes FH (eds) Processing and properties of nanocrystalline materials. The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, Warrendale, pp 345–354
50. Hansen N, Ralph B (1982) The strain and grain size dependence of the flow stress of copper. Acta Metall 30:411–41710.1016/0001-6160(82)90221-8 ↗
51. Esquivel EV, Murr LE (2005) Grain boundary contributions to deformation and solid-state flow in severe plastic deformation. Mater Sci Eng, A 409:13–2310.1016/j.msea.2005.04.063 ↗
52. Murr LE (2016) Dislocation ledge sources: dispelling the myth of Frank–Read source importance. Metall Mater Trans A 47:5811–582610.1007/s11661-015-3286-5 ↗
53. Yang B, Vehoff H (2005) Grain size effects on the mechanical properties of nanonickel examined by nanoindentation. Mater Sci Eng, A 400:467–47010.1016/j.msea.2005.01.077 ↗
54. Cottrell AH (1953) Dislocations and plastic flow in crystals. Clarendon Press, Oxford
55. Yang B, Vehoff H (2007) Dependence of nanohardness upon indentation size and grain size: a local examination of the interaction between dislocations and grain boundaries. Acta Mater 55:849–85610.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.004 ↗
56. Meyers MA, Ashworth E (1982) A model for the effect of grain size on the yield stress of metals. Philos Mag A 46:737–75910.1080/01418618208236928 ↗
57. Raj R, Ashby MF (1971) On grain boundary sliding and diffusion creep. Metall Trans 2:1113–112710.1007/BF02664244 ↗
58. Kim HS, Estrin Y, Bush MB (2000) Plastic deformation behaviour of fine-grained materials. Acta Mater 48:493–50410.1016/S1359-6454(99)00353-5 ↗
59. Fu H-H, Benson DJ, Meyers MA (2001) Analytical and computational description of effect of grain size on yield stress of metals. Acta Mater 49:2567–258210.1016/S1359-6454(01)00062-3 ↗
60. Sun SS, Adams BL, Shet C, Saigal S, King W (1998) Mesoscale investigation of the deformation field of an aluminum bicrystal. Scr Mater 39:501–50810.1016/S1359-6462(98)00189-4 ↗
61. Matthews JW, Crawford JL (1970) Accommodation of misfit between single-crystal films of nickel and copper. Thin Solid Films 5:187–19810.1016/0040-6090(70)90076-3 ↗
62. Dunstan DJ, Bushby AJ (2013) The scaling exponent in the size effect of small scale plastic deformation. Int J Plast 40:152–16210.1016/j.ijplas.2012.08.002 ↗
63. Dickersin K (1990) The existence of publication bias and risk-factors for its occurrence. J Am Med Assoc 263:1385–138910.1001/jama.1990.03440100097014 ↗
64. Newcomb S (1881) Note on the frequency of use of the different digits in natural numbers. Am J Math 4:40–9310.2307/2369148 ↗
65. Benford F (1938) The law of anomalous numbers. Proc Am Philos Soc 78:551–572
66. Formann AK (2010) The Newcomb-Benford law in its relation to some common distributions. PLoS ONE 5:e1054110.1371/journal.pone.0010541 ↗
67. Berger A, Hill TP (2017) What is Benford’s law? Not Am Math Soc 64:132–13410.1090/noti1477 ↗
68. Shao LJ, Ma BQ (2010) The significant digit law in statistical physics. Phys A 389:3109–311610.1016/j.physa.2010.04.021 ↗
69. Wu D, Zhang JY, Huang JC, Bei H, Nieh TG (2013) Grain-boundary strengthening in nanocrystalline chromium and the Hall–Petch coefficient of bcc metals. Scr Mater 68:118–12110.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.09.025 ↗
70. Konstantinidis DA, Aifantis EC (1998) On the ‘anomalous’ hardness of nanocrystalline materials. Nanostruct Mater 10:1111–111810.1016/S0965-9773(98)00145-7 ↗
71. Coble RL (1963) Model for boundary diffusion controlled creep in polycrystalline materials. J Appl Phys 34:1679–168210.1063/1.1702656 ↗
72. Murayama M, Howe JM, Hidaka H, Takaki S (2002) Atomic-level observation of disclination dipoles in mechanically milled, nanocrystalline iron. Science 295:2433–243510.1126/science.1067430 ↗
73. Ovidko IA (2002) Deformation of nanostructures. Science 295:238610.1126/science.1071064 ↗
74. Romanov AE, Kolesnikova AL, Ovidko IA, Aifantis EC (2009) Disclinations in nanocrystalline materials: manifestation of the relay mechanism of plastic deformation. Mater Sci Eng, A 503:62–6710.1016/j.msea.2008.05.053 ↗
75. Sopicka-Lizer M (2010) High energy ball milling: mechanochemical processing of nanopowders. CRC Press, Boca Raton10.1533/9781845699444 ↗
76. Gutkin MY, Ovidko IA, Pande CS (2004) Yield stress of nanocrystalline materials: role of grain-boundary dislocations, triple junctions and Coble creep. Philos Mag 84:847–86310.1080/14786430310001616063 ↗
77. Argon AS, Yip S (2006) The strongest size. Philos Mag Lett 86:713–72010.1080/09500830600986091 ↗
78. Trelewicz JR, Schuh CA (2007) The Hall–Petch breakdown in nanocrystalline metals: a crossover to glass-like deformation. Acta Mater 55:5948–595810.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.020 ↗
79. Zhang X, Aifantis KE (2011) Interpreting the softening of nanomaterials through gradient plasticity. J Mater Res 26:1399–140510.1557/jmr.2011.123 ↗
80. Zhang K, Weertman JR, Eastman JA (2005) Rapid stress-driven grain coarsening in nanocrystalline copper at ambient and cryogenic temperatures. Appl Phys Lett 87:06192110.1063/1.2008377 ↗
81. Dao M, Lu L, Asaro RJ, De Hosson JTM, Ma E (2007) Toward a quantitative understanding of mechanical behavior of nanocrystalline metals. Acta Mater 55:4041–406510.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.038 ↗
82. Cahoon JR, Broughton WH, Kutzak AR (1971) Determination of yield strength from hardness measurements. Metall Trans 2:1979–198310.1007/BF02913433 ↗
83. Gao X-L (2006) An expanding cavity model incorporating strain-hardening and indentation size effects. Int J Solids Struct 43:6615–662910.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.01.008 ↗
84. Derlet PM, Hasnaoui A, Van Swygenhoven H (2003) Atomistic simulations as guidance to experiments. Scr Mater 49:629–63510.1016/S1359-6462(03)00400-7 ↗
85. Wolf D, Yamakov V, Phillpot SR, Mukherjee A, Gleiter H (2005) Deformation of nanocrystalline materials by molecular-dynamics simulation: relationship to experiments? Acta Mater 53:1–4010.1016/j.actamat.2004.08.045 ↗
86. Hasnaoui A, Derlet PM, Van Swygenhoven H (2004) Interaction between dislocations and grain boundaries under an indenter: a molecular dynamics simulation. Acta Mater 52:2251–225810.1016/j.actamat.2004.01.018 ↗
87. Voyiadjis GZ, Yaghoobi M (2016) Role of grain boundary on the sources of size effects. Comput Mater Sci 117:315–32910.1016/j.commatsci.2016.01.025 ↗
88. Hu J, Shi YN, Sauvage X, Sha G, Lu K (2017) Grain boundary stability governs hardening and softening in extremely fine nanograined metals. Science 355:1292–129610.1126/science.aal5166 ↗
89. Valiev RZ (2014) Superior strength in ultrafine-grained materials produced by SPD processing. Mater Trans 55:13–1810.2320/matertrans.MA201325 ↗