Effective length of carbon nanofiber due to an inadequate interphase to optimize the percolation onset and tunneling conductivity of composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Polymer nanocomposites customarily comprise an inadequate interphase failing their properties, but this topic was rarely addressed in the former reports. Herein, the efficient carbon nanofiber (CNF) length ( l eff ) in the CNF-filled composite (PCNF) is expressed by interphase conductivity, interphase depth, CNF features and Y (level of conduction transferring via an inadequate interphase). Then, l eff is used to define the percolation starting and netting ratio. Similarly, a model is progressed for PCNF conductivity (PEC) by the mentioned parameters and tunneling size. The stimuli of momentous factors on the effective length of CNFs, percolation starting and PEC are patterned and explicated. In addition, many experimented data of percolation starting and PEC are provided to assess the developed equations. Higher Y , slender CNFs, thicker interphase and higher interphase conductivity produce the bigger l eff and lower percolation starting improving the PEC. Y = 20 and CNF radius ( R ) of 40 nm promote the PEC to 0.16 S/m, while Y = 5 and R = 120 nm produce an insulative PCNF. Likewise, tunneling size ( λ) of 1 nm together with contact width ( d ) of 60 nm encourage the PEC of 0.45 S/m, whereas a nonconductive composite is shown at λ > 9 nm or d < 20 nm. Hence, the shortest tunnels and the highest contact width noticeably grow the PEC.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Materials for Construction · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Adjustable and weak negative permittivity behavior in carbon nanofiber/poly (vinylidene fluoride) metacomposites10.1002/pc.29587 ↗
2. Influence of electrically aligned carbon nanofiber Z-threading on the fatigue behavior of CFRP composites
3. From wasted nonwoven fabrics to conductive flexible substrates, composited with electrospun porous carbon nanofibers for supercapacitor electrodes and electromagnetic interference shielding materials10.1016/j.diamond.2025.112280 ↗
4. Decrypting of effective resistance for composites of polymer-carbon nanofiber: an applicable approach to regulate the electrical conductivity10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.08.069 ↗
5. Bridging the nano-scale interphase with macro-scale properties: two-step simulating of electrical conductivity for polymer composites incorporating carbon nanofibers10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.07.043 ↗
6. Controlling of tunneling resistance in carbon nanofiber polymer composites: a novel equation for polymer tunneling resistivity by quantifiable parameters10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.04.097 ↗
7. A review on non-enzymatic electrochemical biosensors of glucose using carbon nanofiber nanocomposites10.3390/bios12111004 ↗
8. The role of carbon nanofiber defects on the electrical and mechanical properties of CNF-based resins10.1088/0957-4484/24/30/305704 ↗
9. A comparative study of physico-mechanical and electrical properties of polymer-carbon nanofiber in wet and melt mixing methods10.1016/j.mseb.2019.05.020 ↗
10. A new pattern for conductivity of carbon nanofiber polymer composites with interphase and tunneling parameters10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.108721 ↗
11. Effect of interfacial/interphase conductivity on the electrical conductivity of polymer carbon nanotubes nanocomposites
12. Assessment of electrical conductivity of polymer nanocomposites containing a deficient interphase around graphene nanosheet10.1038/s41598-024-59678-0 ↗
13. A review: role of interfacial adhesion between carbon blacks and elastomeric materials10.5714/CL.2016.18.001 ↗
14. New simple strategy for improving interfacial adhesion of basalt fiber composites by adhering bio-based β-cyclodextrin on fiber
15. Interfacial interaction of polyvinylidene fluoride/multiwalled carbon nanotubes nanocomposites: a rheological study10.1002/app.33927 ↗
16. An attempt to quantitatively predict the interfacial adhesion of differently surface treated nanosilicas in a polyurethane coating matrix using tensile strength and DMTA analysis10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.12.005 ↗
17. Crucial interfacial shear strength to consider an imperfect interphase in halloysite-nanotube-filled biomedical samples10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.06.098 ↗
18. Influences of graphene morphology and contact distance between nanosheets on the effective conductivity of polymer nanocomposites10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.06.124 ↗
19. Development of Kovacs model for electrical conductivity of carbon nanofiber–polymer systems10.1038/s41598-022-26139-5 ↗
20. Insights into excluded volume and percolation of soft interphase and conductivity of carbon fibrous composites with core-shell networks10.1016/j.carbon.2020.01.083 ↗
21. Predicting of electrical conductivity for Polymer-MXene nanocomposites10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.014 ↗
22. A predictive model for electrical conductivity of polymer carbon nanofiber composites considering nanofiber/interphase network and tunneling dimensions10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.12.150 ↗
23. Simulation of electrical conductivity for polymer carbon nanofiber composites assuming an extended nanofiber by interphase depth and tunneling distance10.1038/s41598-025-17613-x ↗
24. Effects of mixing on electrical properties of carbon nanofiber and polymer composites10.1002/app.30381 ↗
25. Electrical conductivity of random and aligned nanocomposites: theoretical models and experimental validation10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106543 ↗
26. Tunneling resistance model for piezoresistive carbon nanotube polymer composites10.1088/1361-6528/ac9c0d ↗
27. Prediction of electrical conductivity of polymer-graphene nanocomposites by developing an analytical model considering interphase, tunneling and geometry effects
28. Unraveling the roles of network and tunnels in the conductivity of carbon nanofiber composites10.1038/s41598-025-19376-x ↗
29. Estimating the conductivity of a partial interphase and its impact on the tunneling conductivity of carbon nanofiber‐filled samples
30. Estimation of the volume resistivity of electrically conductive composites10.1002/pc.10324 ↗
31. Correlations between percolation threshold, dispersion state, and aspect ratio of carbon nanotubes10.1002/adfm.200700065 ↗
32. Decoding of contact number among carbon nanofibers in polymer composites: a new insight to govern electron transfer through tunneling zones10.1016/j.compositesa.2025.109124 ↗
33. Electrically conductive polymer nanocomposites of polymethylmethacrylate and carbon nanofibers prepared by chaotic mixing10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.06.017 ↗
34. Highly dispersed and electrically conductive polycarbonate/oxidized carbon nanofiber composites for electrostatic dissipation applications10.1016/j.carbon.2010.06.050 ↗
35. Aggregated/agglomerated and dispersed randomly oriented wavy CNTs in electrically conductive polymer nanocomposites: impact of dispersion quality and polymer/particle interphase10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.01.061 ↗
36. Prediction of piezoresistive sensitivity and percolation probability of synergetic CNT-GNP conductive network composite10.1016/j.sna.2022.113414 ↗
37. Effect of electro-magneto mode number on CNT/GNP polymer composite quantum tunneling10.1088/2631-6331/add709 ↗
38. A finite element percolation tunneling approach on the electrical properties of carbon nanotube elastomer nanocomposite pressure sensors10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108111 ↗
39. Simulation of the role of agglomerations in the tunneling conductivity of polymer/carbon nanotube piezoresistive strain sensors10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110242 ↗