Physics-informed neural networks with multi-stage transfer learning for electromagnetic field prediction in electroslag remelting process
Source abstract
Abstract
Electroslag remelting (ESR) requires rapid and physically consistent electromagnetic-field prediction for controlling Joule heating, molten-pool morphology, inclusion removal and solidification quality. Conventional finite element and finite volume simulations are accurate but computationally expensive and difficult to reconfigure for new operating conditions, whereas purely data-driven models are unreliable under sparse and noisy industrial measurements. This work develops a physics-informed neural network (PINN) with multi-stage transfer learning for ESR electromagnetic-field prediction. Maxwell-equation residuals, axisymmetric boundary constraints and sparse magnetic-flux-density measurements are embedded in a composite loss. Training proceeds through a 50 Hz baseline model, frequency transfer over 10-50 Hz and geometric parameterization of slag-pool thickness over 0.15-0.21 m. The baseline model predicts magnetic flux density with a mean relative error of 0.16% and a maximum point error of 0.27%, while maintaining a 16% power-balance deviation and less than 13% current-conservation error. Frequency transfer shows that increasing frequency from 10 to 50 Hz raises the slag-pool power fraction from 64% to 85%. Increasing slag-pool thickness from 0.15 to 0.21 m raises this fraction from 62% to 88% and reduces the characteristic ingot heating depth from 0.26 to 0.15 m. Ablation and noise tests confirm the complementary roles of physics and data constraints, with a 5.44% prediction error under 10% training-data noise. The framework provides a fast computational kernel for ESR soft sensing, process optimization and digital-twin development.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Heat transfer and fluid flow phenomena in electroslag refining10.1007/BF02822674 ↗
2. The modeling of pool profiles, temperature profiles and velocity fields in ESR systems10.1007/BF02676888 ↗
3. Modelling of fluid flow and heat transfer in industrial-scale ESR system
4. Review of mathematical models of fluid flow, heat transfer, and mass transfer in electroslag remelting process10.1179/030192399677275 ↗
5. Review on modeling and simulation of electroslag remelting10.1002/srin.201700100 ↗
6. A comprehensive model of the electroslag remelting process: description and validation10.1007/s11663-008-9208-9 ↗
7. A general coupled mathematical model of electromagnetic phenomena, two-phase flow, and heat transfer in electroslag remelting process including conducting in the mold10.1007/s11663-014-0158-0 ↗
8. Magnetohydrodynamic and thermal behavior of electroslag remelting slags10.1007/BF02672532 ↗
9. On the importance of electric currents flowing directly into the mould during an ESR process10.1002/srin.200806176 ↗
10. Droplet formation in small electroslag remelting processes
11. Mathematical model for electroslag remelting process10.1016/S1006-706X(08)60042-4 ↗
12. Comprehensive mathematical model for simulating electroslag remelting10.1007/s11663-015-0546-0 ↗
13. A comprehensive 3D mathematical model of the electroslag remelting process10.1007/s11663-015-0342-x ↗
14. Modeling of electromagnetic field and liquid metal pool shape in an electroslag remelting process with two series-connected electrodes10.1007/s11663-013-9996-4 ↗
15. Coupling of multiple numerical models to simulate electroslag remelting process for alloy 71810.2355/isijinternational.55.1408 ↗
16. Computational modeling of electroslag remelting processes10.1051/jp4:2004120048 ↗
17. A dynamic mesh-based approach to model melting and shape of an ESR electrode10.1007/s11663-015-0384-0 ↗
18. The velocity field in the molten slag region of ESR systems: a comparison of measurements in a model system with theoretical predictions10.1007/BF02666953 ↗
19. The old and the new: can physics-informed deep-learning replace traditional linear solvers?10.3389/fdata.2021.669097 ↗
20. State of the art in applications of machine learning in steelmaking process modeling10.1007/s12613-023-2646-1 ↗
21. Physics-informed machine learning10.1038/s42254-021-00314-5 ↗
22. Scientific machine learning through physics-informed neural networks: where we are and what's next10.1007/s10915-022-01939-z ↗
23. Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
24. Magnetostatics and micromagnetics with physics informed neural networks10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168951 ↗
25. Physics-informed neural networks for inverse problems in nano-optics and metamaterials10.1364/OE.384875 ↗
26. DeepXDE: a deep learning library for solving differential equations10.1137/19M1274067 ↗
27. Understanding and mitigating gradient flow pathologies in physics-informed neural networks10.1137/20M1318043 ↗
28. Hidden fluid mechanics: learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations10.1126/science.aaw4741 ↗
29. Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: a review10.1007/s10409-021-01148-1 ↗
30. Physics-informed machine learning: a survey on problems, methods and applications
31. A novel sequential method to train physics informed neural networks for Allen Cahn and Cahn Hilliard equations10.1016/j.cma.2021.114474 ↗
32. Wang
33. Extended physics-informed neural networks (XPINNs): a generalized space-time domain decomposition based deep learning framework for nonlinear partial differential equations10.4208/cicp.OA-2020-0164 ↗
34. Self-adaptive physics-informed neural networks10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111722 ↗
35. Li · 2010
36. Jackson · 1999
37. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization