Microalloying strategies for achieving high-temperature strength retention in lean-Mo fire-resistant steels
Source abstract
Abstract
Fire-resistant steels are designed to retain sufficient strength at elevated temperatures and prevent sudden structural collapse during fire exposure. Although Mo is widely recognized as the most effective alloying element for enhancing high-temperature strength retention, the development of low-Mo steels with comparable fire-resistant performance is increasingly demanded due to the high cost and limited availability of Mo. In this study, the feasibility of achieving fire-resistant performance in lean-Mo steels containing only 0.15 wt.% Mo is systematically investigated using a phase-fraction-based framework. Seven steels with systematically varied alloying combinations were fabricated, and their fire-resistant performance was evaluated by tensile testing at room temperature (RT) and 600 o C. Microstructural characterization focused on quantitative phase-fraction analysis using electron backscatter diffraction. Notably, an appropriate alloy design enabled the formation of a high bainite fraction exceeding 83% even in 0.15 wt.% Mo. This increase in bainite fraction led to a substantial enhancement in yield strength (YS) from 290 to 565 MPa at RT and from 109 to 406 MPa at 600 o C, resulting in a YS ratio (600 o C/RT) of 0.674, thereby satisfying the commonly accepted fire-resistant steel criterion. Furthermore, the YS at both RT and 600 o C, as well as the yield-strength ratio (600 o C/RT), exhibited strong linear correlations with the bainite fraction. These results demonstrate that lean-Mo fire-resistant steels can be realized through rational microalloying strategies and confirm that the bainite fraction serves as a robust, physically meaningful, and experimentally accessible descriptor for evaluating and designing fire-resistant steels.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fire effects on concrete materials · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Engineering and Material Science Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Chijiiwa · Nippon Steel Tech Rep · 1993 · 58 · 47
2. Sha · Mater Trans · 2001 · 42 · 191310.2320/matertrans.42.1913 ↗
3. Panigrahi · Bull Mater Sci · 2006 · 29 · 5910.1007/BF02709357 ↗
4. Nb-Microalloyed “Fire-Resistant” construction steels: recent progress
5. Lee · Metall Mater Trans A · 2002 · 33 · 168910.1007/s11661-002-0178-2 ↗
6. Jo · Mater Des · 2020 · 19410.1016/j.matdes.2020.108882 ↗
7. Kelly · J Constr Steel Res · 1999 · 50 · 22310.1016/S0143-974X(98)00252-1 ↗
8. Shinnittetsu giho
9. Shakil · Fire Saf J · 2020 · 11610.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103157 ↗
10. Zeybek · Steel Compos Struct · 2024 · 53 · 243
11. Escobar · Mater Char · 2021 · 18210.1016/j.matchar.2021.111567 ↗
12. Franceschi · J Mater Res Technol · 2024 · 32 · 293110.1016/j.jmrt.2024.08.141 ↗
13. Han · Int J Fatig · 2025 · 200
14. Wan · Mater Des · 2012 · 36 · 22710.1016/j.matdes.2011.10.055 ↗
15. Wan · Mater Des · 2012 · 35 · 33510.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.009 ↗
16. Wan · J Mater Eng Perform · 2014 · 23 · 278010.1007/s11665-014-1051-3 ↗
17. Uranga · Adv Manuf · 2020 · 8 · 1510.1007/s40436-019-00285-y ↗
18. Sim · Met Mater Int · 2022 · 28 · 33710.1007/s12540-020-00870-y ↗
19. Li · Steel Res Int · 2022 · 9310.1002/srin.202100515 ↗
20. Ferreira · J Mater Res Technol · 2024 · 33 · 236510.1016/j.jmrt.2024.09.150 ↗
21. Gross · Metall Mater Trans A · 2019 · 50 · 20910.1007/s11661-018-4985-5 ↗
22. Moon · J Mater Res Technol · 2021 · 15 · 509510.1016/j.jmrt.2021.10.132 ↗
23. Zhang · J Mater Eng Perform · 2023 · 32 · 395810.1007/s11665-022-07388-x ↗
24. Yoshida · Mater Trans · 2014 · 55 · 89910.2320/matertrans.M2013393 ↗
25. Choi · Steel Res Int · 2023 · 9410.1002/srin.202200103 ↗
26. Mandalika · J Mater Eng Perform · 2024 · 33 · 195910.1007/s11665-023-08110-1 ↗
27. Lu · Mater Res Express · 2021 · 810.1088/2053-1591/ac0a03 ↗
28. Wang · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2021 · 807
29. Park · J Mater Res Technol · 2025 · 37 · 214410.1016/j.jmrt.2025.06.144 ↗
30. Cong · J Mater Res Technol · 2021 · 13 · 122010.1016/j.jmrt.2021.05.061 ↗
31. Cong · Steel Res Int · 2021 · 9210.1002/srin.202100006 ↗
32. Park · J Mater Res Technol · 2025 · 37 · 372910.1016/j.jmrt.2025.07.034 ↗
33. Zaefferer · J Microsc · 2008 · 230 · 49910.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.02010.x ↗
34. Chen · Mater Char · 2018 · 139 · 4910.1016/j.matchar.2018.01.041 ↗
35. Jentner · Mater Des · 2023 · 23610.1016/j.matdes.2023.112507 ↗
36. Kang · Acta Mater · 2023 · 25410.1016/j.actamat.2023.118985 ↗
37. Asahi · ISIJ Int · 1993 · 33 · 119010.2355/isijinternational.33.1190 ↗
38. Seok · Scr Mater · 2014 · 87 · 4910.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.05.004 ↗
39. Li · Scr Mater · 2015 · 96 · 1310.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.09.031 ↗
40. Li · Ultramicroscopy · 2015 · 159 · 24010.1016/j.ultramic.2015.03.009 ↗
41. Miyamoto · Scr Mater · 2018 · 154 · 16810.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.05.046 ↗
42. Takahashi · Acta Mater · 2017 · 133 · 4110.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.021 ↗
43. Hara · ISIJ Int · 2004 · 44 · 143110.2355/isijinternational.44.1431 ↗
44. Bhadeshia · 2015
45. Rana · 2016
46. Kumar · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2008 · 474 · 27010.1016/j.msea.2007.05.007 ↗
47. Tasan · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2015 · 45 · 39110.1146/annurev-matsci-070214-021103 ↗