journal article·2026-05Open access

A design framework for additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V cervical corpectomy cage combining standardized topology-optimized core and customized lattice interfaces

Shih-Chieh Shen, Shao-Fu Huang, Chiao-Min Chang, Hsuan-Wen Wang, Chun-Li Lin

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) enables the integration of topology-optimized load-bearing architectures with lattice-based contact surfaces, offering new opportunities to tailor the mechanical performance of metallic spinal implants. In this study, a Ti-6Al-4V AM cervical corpectomy fusion (PCCF) cage with a weighted topology-optimized core and customized lattice contact surfaces was developed. Finite element analysis and topology optimization under triaxial physiological loading conditions were employed to define the optimal material distribution, resulting in a load-bearing outer shell with a lightweight, hollow interior suitable for bone grafting. The superior and inferior contact surfaces were reconstructed from patient CT data and integrated with a bionic lattice to promote osseointegration. Experimental validation was performed using static compression, fatigue, and subsidence tests in accordance with ASTM F2077-22 and ASTM F2267-22, benchmarked against ISO 23089-2. The PCCF cage exhibited an axial stiffness of 7397.93 ± 142.62 N/mm and a yield load of 8250.79 ± 281.92 N, exceeding ISO reference values, and withstood 5,000,000 cycles of axial (1582 N) and torsional (1.0 N·m) loading without structural failure. Subsidence testing yielded a stiffness (Kp) of 476.06 ± 52.97 N/mm, approximately 1.85 times higher than the ISO benchmark, indicating improved load distribution at the bone–implant interface. In vitro cell viability testing further showed higher metabolic activity on the lattice surface than on a solid surface. The proposed design framework was demonstrated using a customized C3–C6 PCCF cage as a representative case study, highlighting the potential of AM as a design-enabling approach for mechanically robust and subsidence-resistant spinal implants.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Topology Optimization in Engineering · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. A systematic review of the use of expandable cages in the cervical spine10.1007/s10143-015-0649-8 ↗
2. Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in terms of postoperative subsidence and sagittal alignment comparative analysis of 2 different types of titanium mesh cage for single-level10.1097/BSD.0000000000000938 ↗
3. Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of oppressive myelopathy owing to cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis10.1007/s00586-017-5451-6 ↗
4. Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus discectomy and fusion for the treatment of two-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: analysis of sagittal balance and axial symptoms10.1007/s00264-018-3804-3 ↗
5. Evaluation of the effectiveness of expandable cages for reconstruction of the anterior column of the spine10.1177/2309499019900472 ↗
6. Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes between expandable and non-expandable cages following cervical corpectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis10.31616/asj.2022.0179 ↗
7. Application of an expandable cage for reconstruction of the cervical spine in a consecutive series of eighty-six patients10.3390/medicina56120642 ↗
8. Anterior corpectomy and reconstruction using dynamic cervical plate and titanium mesh cage for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study
9. A novel anatomic titanium mesh cage for reducing the subsidence rate after anterior cervical corpectomy: a finite element study
10. Can an endplate-conformed cervical cage provide a better biomechanical environment than a typical non-conformed cage?: a finite element model and cadaver study10.1111/os.12261 ↗
11. Mechanical assessment of a titanium cervical spine corpectomy cage assembled with 3D-printed patient-specific endplate-conformed contact surfaces and a traditionally manufactured expandable mechanism10.1186/s41205-025-00299-2 ↗
12. Biomechanical evaluation of an osteoporotic anatomical 3D printed posterior lumbar interbody fusion cage with internal lattice design based on weighted topology optimization10.18063/ijb.697 ↗
13. Enhancing bone ingrowth and mechanical bonding in 3D-printed titanium alloy implants via lattice design and growth factors
14. Feasibility evaluation of a new lattice for porous surface design in additive manufacturing medical implants under interfacial tensile bonded testing author links open overlay panel
15. Designing a 3D-printed medical implant with mechanically macrostructural topology and microbionic lattices: a novel wedge-shaped spacer for high tibial osteotomy and biomechanical study10.36922/ijb.1584 ↗
16. Finite element analysis of the lumbar spine with a new cage using a topology optimization method10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.03.007 ↗
17. Cervical spine finite element models for healthy subjects: development and validation10.1115/1.4056296 ↗
18. Adjacent segment biomechanical changes after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using either a zero-profile device or cage plus plate: a finite element analysis10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103760 ↗
19. Early stage prediction of bone regeneration using FEA and cell differentiation algorithms with 3D-printed PLA and PCL scaffolds: modeling and application to dorsal double-plating in distal radius fractures10.1186/s41205-025-00278-7 ↗
20. ASTM F2077-22, Characterization and fatigue of spinal intervertebral body fusion devices.
21. ASTM F2267 standard test method for measuring load-induced subsidence of intervertebral body fusion device under static axial compression.
22. 2021
23. Patient-specific Ti-6Al-4V lattice implants for critical-sized load-bearing bone defects reconstruction10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111605 ↗