journal article·2025-04-22Open access

Miniaturized Micrometer-Level Copper Wiring and Electrodes Based on Reverse-Offset Printing for Flexible Circuits

Kim Eiroma, Asko Sneck, Olli Halonen, Tuomas Happonen, Henrik Sandberg, Jaakko Leppäniemi

Abstract

High-resolution reverse-offset printing (ROP) is developed for miniaturization of printed electronics, resulting in a notable decrease in material usage compared to conventional printing processes. Two alternative ROP processes for patterning of metal conductors are available that are comparable in their cost per sample: direct nanoparticle (NP) printing (e.g., Ag and Cu) and patterning of vacuum-deposited metal (Ag, Al, Au, Cu, Ti, etc.) films using ROP printed polymer resist ink and the lift-off (LO) process. In this work, we focus on ROP of Cu NP ink followed by intense pulsed light (IPL) sintering and vacuum-deposited Cu patterned by ROP lift-off (LO). The good large-scale uniformity of the two processes is demonstrated by a grid of 300 individual thickness, sheet resistance, and resistivity measurement points with low variation over the 10 cm × 10 cm printed sample area. Sheet resistances of 0.56 ± 0.03 and 1.23 ± 0.05 Ω/□ are obtained at 113 and 40 nm thickness for Cu NP and Cu LO, respectively. Both processes show <5% thickness variation over a large area. A line-space (L/S) resolution of 2 μm is obtained for ROP patterned vacuum-deposited Cu having very low line edge roughness (LER) (∼60 nm), whereas for direct ROP printed Cu NP ink, the L/S resolution (2-4 μm) is limited by LER (∼900 nm) and influenced by the printed layer thickness. Based on the two fabrication routes, a flexible chip component assembly process is presented. Preliminary bending resistance results indicate that both ROP-based patterning processes yield a robust electrical interconnection between the ultrathin polyimide (PI) 5 mm × 5 mm chip and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). ROP shows promise as a scalable and sustainable patterning method for flexible ICs/chips that are assembled on flexible, stretchable, or biodegradable substrates and used, e.g., in wearable, large-scale sensing, and in environmental monitoring.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Ltd., Tietotie 3, FI-02150 Espoo, Finland

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Ltd., Kaitoväylä 1, FI-90590 Oulu, Finland

Funding

HORIZON EUROPE Digital, Industry and Space

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/admt.20200101610.1002/admt.202001016 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.05.01910.1016/j.tsf.2009.05.019 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.10543210.1016/j.orgel.2019.105432 ↗
4. Murata, K. In Direct Fabrication of Super-Fine Wiring and Bumping by Using Inkjet Processa, IEEE Polytronic 2007 Conference; IEEE: Odaiba, Tokyo, 2007; pp 293–296.10.1109/POLYTR.2007.4339186 ↗
5. 10.7567/1347-4065/ab646210.7567/1347-4065/ab6462 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41598-022-13352-510.1038/s41598-022-13352-5 ↗
7. 10.1002/inf2.1250510.1002/inf2.12505 ↗
8. 10.1002/advs.20210462310.1002/advs.202104623 ↗
9. 10.1002/smll.20130300010.1002/smll.201303000 ↗
10. 10.1155/2014/68431710.1155/2014/684317 ↗
11. 10.1039/d2nr03990g10.1039/d2nr03990g ↗
12. 10.1007/s11051-015-3277-x10.1007/s11051-015-3277-x ↗
13. 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.11.14210.1016/j.tsf.2006.11.142 ↗
14. 10.7567/JJAP.52.05DB1910.7567/JJAP.52.05DB19 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.10.02410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.10.024 ↗
16. 10.1038/srep0883210.1038/srep08832 ↗
17. 10.1007/s00339-009-5360-610.1007/s00339-009-5360-6 ↗
18. 10.1021/am404581b10.1021/am404581b ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.11.28610.1016/j.jmrt.2023.11.286 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.1c2122310.1021/acsami.1c21223 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.1c0812610.1021/acsami.1c08126 ↗
22. 10.1088/0960-1317/25/9/09500210.1088/0960-1317/25/9/095002 ↗
23. 10.1088/0960-1317/25/7/07501910.1088/0960-1317/25/7/075019 ↗
24. Happonen, T.; Järvinen, P.; Paakkolanvaara, M.; Alajoki, T. In Reliability Assessment of Temperature Sensors Integrated on Elastic Substrate, IEEE 10th Electronics System-Integration Technology Conference; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2024.10.1109/ESTC60143.2024.10712123 ↗
25. 10.1007/s40684-020-00193-810.1007/s40684-020-00193-8 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.mee.2014.12.00710.1016/j.mee.2014.12.007 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mee.2008.01.10410.1016/j.mee.2008.01.104 ↗
28. 10.1088/2058-8585/acbf6510.1088/2058-8585/acbf65 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01818-610.1016/S0040-6090(00)01818-6 ↗
30. 10.1039/D0SM00139B10.1039/D0SM00139B ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.9b1346710.1021/acsami.9b13467 ↗
32. 10.1002/aelm.20240054610.1002/aelm.202400546 ↗
33. Ohring M. · 1992
34. 10.1088/2058-8585/ad311510.1088/2058-8585/ad3115 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.9b0083810.1021/acsami.9b00838 ↗
36. 10.1088/2058-8585/acb2d910.1088/2058-8585/acb2d9 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41598-021-94024-810.1038/s41598-021-94024-8 ↗