Resolving the strength-to-stiffness ratio dependency for instrumented macroindentation based local mechanical properties
Source abstract
Abstract
In case the distribution of mechanical material properties is inhomogeneous, for example in welded joints, an indentation based measure can be adopted to obtain local estimates. However, the property precision and accuracy is often lacking and a next step to reveal the one-to-one relation between instrumented macroindentation and material stress strain curve was set, proposing semi-analytical model improvements and deploying Monte Carlo based numerical model simulations for verification. Utilizing experimental data for DH36 and S355 steel, high-precision Young’s modulus estimates were obtained within 95 [%] reliability of the uniaxial tensile test reference values and less than a 10 [%] error. For high reliability, the number of indentation tests must be sufficiently large. Contact radius information is at least required to obtain the yield strength and several formulations provide estimates within ∼ 20 [%] error for a large range of material properties. A significantly more accurate value can be obtained if the Young’s modulus is not involved, providing an error within 10 [%]. Introducing a proportional plastic strain offset criterion rather than the well-established constant one to obtain an indentation based yield strength estimate, the strength-to-stiffness ratio dependency was eliminated. Accuracy is improved to a ∼ 20 [%] error range with 95 [%] reliability. Using the material proof strength rather than the yield strength even reduces the 95 [%] reliability error estimate to ∼ 15 [%]. Experimental instrumented macroindentation based yield strength estimates are within 10 [%] error compared to the uniaxial tensile test values. • Proposed novel spherical macroindentation based local mechanical properties model. • Improved indentation based strength-to-stiffness independent yield strength estimate. • Explored precision and accuracy of three contact radius models. • Verified model using Monte Carlo FE simulations. • Validated model using tensile tests and macroindentation tests.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (69)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM International · 2000
2. Functionally graded Inconel 718 processed by additive manufacturing: Crystallographic texture, anisotropy of microstructure and mechanical properties10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.075 ↗
3. Microstructure and mechanical properties of gas metal arc welded CoCrFeMnNi joints using a 308 stainless steel filler metal10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.115053 ↗
4. Dissimilar laser welding of a CoCrFeMnNi high entropy alloy to 316 stainless steel10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114219 ↗
5. Forge welding turns full circle: friction stir welding of steel10.1179/0301923313Z.000000000224 ↗
6. Anisotropic elastic–plastic properties of surface-modified layers of 18CrNiMo7-6 alloy steel after carburizing heat treatment determined by an indentation method10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.01.117 ↗
7. Fatigue life prediction of spot-welded joints using a novel indentation technique for precise elastoplastic characterization of weld zones10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.01.116 ↗
8. Historical origins of indentation hardness testing10.1179/1743284711Y.0000000127 ↗
9. An improved relationship between vickers hardness and yield stress for cold formed materials and its experimental verification10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62929-1 ↗
10. The relationship between hardness and yield stress in irradiated austenitic and ferritic steels10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.09.024 ↗
11. Correlation of yield strength and tensile strength with hardness for steels10.1007/s11665-008-9225-5 ↗
12. Tabor · 1951
13. The determination of yield StrengthFrom hardness measurements
14. Use of hardness, PIP and tensile testing to obtain stress-strain relationships for metals10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104846 ↗
15. The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile10.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4 ↗
16. A method for interpreting the data from depth-sensing indentation instruments10.1557/JMR.1986.0601 ↗
17. On the generality of the relationship among contact stiffness, contact area, and elastic modulus during indentation10.1557/JMR.1992.0613 ↗
18. Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: Advances in understanding and refinements to methodology10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
19. A critical examination of the fundamental relations used in the analysis of nanoindentation data10.1557/JMR.1999.0306 ↗
20. Analysis of Berkovich indentation10.1016/0020-7683(95)00033-7 ↗
21. A theoretical study of the Brinell hardness test
22. Self-similarity simplification approaches for the modeling and analysis of Rockwell hardness indentation10.6028/jres.107.033 ↗
23. Indentation of self-similar indenters: An FEM-assisted energy-based analysis10.1016/j.jmps.2014.02.002 ↗
24. Absence of one-to-one correspondence between elastoplastic properties and sharp-indentation load–penetration data10.1557/JMR.2005.0053 ↗
25. Can stress–strain relationships be obtained from indentation curves using conical and pyramidal indenters?10.1557/JMR.1999.0472 ↗
26. Uniqueness of reverse analysis from conical indentation tests10.1557/JMR.2004.0306 ↗
27. Investigations of hardness testing and hardness
28. Hertz · 1896
29. Determination of the effective zero-point and the extraction of spherical nanoindentation stress–strain curves10.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.036 ↗
30. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments10.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
31. The influence of plastic hardening on surface deformation modes around vickers and spherical indents10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00140-3 ↗
32. An experimental method to determine the contact radius changes during a spherical instrumented indentation10.1016/j.mechmat.2007.10.002 ↗
33. Quantitative determination of contact depth during spherical indentation of metallic materials—A FEM study10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.217 ↗
34. Effective indenter radius and frame compliance in instrumented indentation testing using a spherical indenter10.1557/jmr.2009.0358 ↗
35. Theoretical and experimental analysis of contact radius for spherical indentation10.1016/j.mechmat.2010.03.003 ↗
36. Elastic analysis of some punch problems for a layered medium10.1016/0020-7683(87)90116-8 ↗
37. Correlation of spherical nanoindentation stress-strain curves to simple compression stress-strain curves for elastic-plastic isotropic materials using finite element models10.1016/j.actamat.2016.04.034 ↗
38. Critical evaluation of spherical indentation stress-strain protocols for the estimation of the yield strengths of steels10.1007/s11340-021-00689-7 ↗
39. Analysis of the spherical indentation cycle for elastic–perfectly plastic solids10.1557/JMR.2004.0468 ↗
40. Elastic–plastic spherical indentation: Deformation regimes, evolution of plasticity, and hardening effect10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.01.003 ↗
41. The correlation of indentation experiments10.1016/0022-5096(70)90029-3 ↗
42. Analysis of Vickers indentation10.1016/0020-7683(94)90225-9 ↗
43. Can indentation technique measure unique elastoplastic properties?10.1557/jmr.2009.0100 ↗
44. On the uniqueness of measuring elastoplastic properties from indentation: The indistinguishable mystical materials10.1016/j.jmps.2007.01.010 ↗
45. On the uniqueness and sensitivity issues in determining the elastic and plastic properties of power-law hardening materials through sharp and spherical indentation10.1080/14786430701589343 ↗
46. Numerical and analytical study to the uniqueness problem in identification of uniaxial parameters through spherical indentation10.1016/j.mechmat.2022.104429 ↗
47. Determination of tensile behavior of hot-pressed Mg–TiO2 and Mg–ZrO2 nanocomposites using indentation test and a holistic inverse modeling technique10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.090 ↗
48. Computational modeling of the forward and reverse problems in instrumented sharp indentation10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00295-6 ↗
49. Scaling, dimensional analysis, and indentation measurements10.1016/j.mser.2004.05.001 ↗
50. Determination of elastoplastic properties by instrumented sharp indentation10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00011-1 ↗
51. Correction of indentation load–depth curve based on elastic deformation of sharp indenter10.1016/j.mechmat.2013.10.002 ↗
52. Profilometry-based inverse finite element method indentation plastometry10.1002/adem.202100437 ↗
53. Comparison between stress-strain plots obtained from indentation plastometry, based on residual indent profiles, and from uniaxial testing10.1016/j.actamat.2019.02.006 ↗
54. Effects of 'sinking in' and 'piling up' on estimating the contact area under load in indentation10.1080/095008398178093 ↗
55. Influence of penetration depth and mechanical properties on contact radius determination for spherical indentation10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.007 ↗
56. Influences of pileup on the measurement of mechanical properties by load and depth sensing indentation techniques10.1557/JMR.1998.0146 ↗
57. Assessment of mechanical properties for dissimilar metal welds: A nondestructive approach10.1007/s11665-019-3867-3 ↗
58. Aging response of the young’s modulus and mechanical properties of Ti-29Nb-13Ta-4.6Zr for biomedical applications10.1007/s11661-003-0230-x ↗
59. Profilometry-based indentation plastometry to obtain stress-strain curves from anisotropic superalloy components made by additive manufacturing
60. Importance of surface preparation on the nano-indentation stress-strain curves measured in metals10.1557/jmr.2009.0137 ↗
61. ANSYS · 2019
62. A critical assessment of the effect of indentation spacing on the measurement of hardness and modulus using instrumented indentation testing
63. ASTM International · 2018
64. Tensile deformation
65. Determination of an effective zero-point and extraction of indentation stress–strain curves without the continuous stiffness measurement signal10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.11.028 ↗
66. High throughput exploration of process-property linkages in Al-6061 using instrumented spherical microindentation and microstructurally graded samples10.1186/s40192-016-0054-3 ↗
67. for Standardization · 2015
68. Size-dependent mechanical properties in AA6082 tailor welded specimens10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.05.004 ↗
69. Experiment-based regional characterization of HAZ mechanical properties for laser welding10.1007/s00170-014-6762-y ↗