Alternative Sintering Processes and Their Influence on the Electrical Resistance of Printed Ag Nanoparticle Conductive Networks
Source abstract
Abstract
The effectiveness of postprinting treatment processes, particularly sintering, is essential in optimizing the functionality of printed electronics. However, evaluating various sintering techniques has largely been qualitative, while a comprehensive analysis of their impacts in the context of flexible electronics is missing. Using Ag-based nanoparticle ink as a case study, this work systematically examines four distinct sintering methods, thermal, vacuum, chemical, and photonic (using nonthermal ultraviolet light), to quantitatively evaluate their performance and feasibility in the large-scale fabrication of printed electronics. In particular, we studied chemical sintering by quantifying the role of chemical agents in the device’s conductivity. While this work does not intend to cover all existing sintering methods for printed electronics, our findings offer a detailed evaluation of several postprinting treatment processes, shedding light on how different sintering approaches affect the performance of printed electronic components and architecture.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409, United States
Funding
Texas Tech University
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1179/174328008X35353810.1179/174328008X353538 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.11718210.1016/j.actamat.2021.117182 ↗
3. 10.1002/smll.20130300010.1002/smll.201303000 ↗
4. 10.1039/C8CS00738A10.1039/C8CS00738A ↗
5. 10.1039/C5RA12013F10.1039/C5RA12013F ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.7b0698010.1021/acsami.7b06980 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.10140510.1016/j.apmt.2022.101405 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jsamd.2021.09.00210.1016/j.jsamd.2021.09.002 ↗
9. 10.1002/aelm.20160026010.1002/aelm.201600260 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20200308110.1002/adma.202003081 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10652210.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106522 ↗
12. 10.1039/D1TA05858D10.1039/D1TA05858D ↗
13. 10.1039/D1CS00490E10.1039/D1CS00490E ↗
14. 10.1039/C9TA07552F10.1039/C9TA07552F ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apmt.2019.02.01210.1016/j.apmt.2019.02.012 ↗
16. 10.3390/met1202023410.3390/met12020234 ↗
17. 10.1039/D2EE01844F10.1039/D2EE01844F ↗
18. Wang K. · 2022 · 49 · 1819
19. 10.1021/acsaelm.1c0021810.1021/acsaelm.1c00218 ↗
20. 10.1039/C7NR01604B10.1039/C7NR01604B ↗
21. 10.1038/s41528-021-00111-110.1038/s41528-021-00111-1 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0041710.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00417 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10515910.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.105159 ↗
24. 10.1038/srep1484510.1038/srep14845 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20050242210.1002/adma.200502422 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20120089910.1002/adma.201200899 ↗
27. 10.48550/arXiv.0709.184210.48550/arXiv.0709.1842 ↗
28. 10.1039/b823329b10.1039/b823329b ↗
29. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.775.14410.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.775.144 ↗
30. 10.1109/TNANO.2017.265834110.1109/TNANO.2017.2658341 ↗
31. 10.1039/C4TC01820F10.1039/C4TC01820F ↗
32. 10.1007/s11661-003-0024-110.1007/s11661-003-0024-1 ↗
33. 10.1007/s00339-011-6680-x10.1007/s00339-011-6680-x ↗
34. 10.1021/acsami.1c1404910.1021/acsami.1c14049 ↗
35. 10.3390/nano1111284010.3390/nano11112840 ↗
36. 10.1002/aelm.20210019410.1002/aelm.202100194 ↗
37. Polzinger, B.; Schoen, F.; Matic, V.; Keck, J.; Willeck, H.; Eberhardt, W.; Kueck, H. Uv-Sintering of Inkjet-Printed Conductive Silver Tracks. In 2011 11th IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology; IEEE, 2011, pp 201–204.10.1109/NANO.2011.6144541 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsami.9b0643210.1021/acsami.9b06432 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cej.2016.12.07110.1016/j.cej.2016.12.071 ↗
40. 10.1016/S1872-5805(21)60028-810.1016/S1872-5805(21)60028-8 ↗
41. 10.2320/matertrans.M201317310.2320/matertrans.M2013173 ↗
42. 10.1515/ehs-2015-000210.1515/ehs-2015-0002 ↗
43. 10.1021/nn200584810.1021/nn2005848 ↗
44. 10.3390/pr805059210.3390/pr8050592 ↗
45. 10.1039/c2jm32789a10.1039/c2jm32789a ↗
46. 10.1039/c1jm13174e10.1039/c1jm13174e ↗
47. 10.1002/anie.20190860010.1002/anie.201908600 ↗
48. 10.1039/c0jm03838e10.1039/c0jm03838e ↗
49. 10.1007/s10854-021-06313-710.1007/s10854-021-06313-7 ↗
50. Corsino, D. C.; Balela, M. D. L. Room Temperature Sintering of Printer Silver Nanoparticle Conductive Ink. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing, 2017; Vol. 264, p 012020.10.1088/1757-899X/264/1/012020 ↗
51. 10.1002/adma.20150076810.1002/adma.201500768 ↗
52. 10.1126/science.122632510.1126/science.1226325 ↗
53. 10.1039/D0MH01358G10.1039/D0MH01358G ↗
54. 10.1016/j.cej.2020.12629510.1016/j.cej.2020.126295 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.10.03510.1016/j.snb.2017.10.035 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0363410.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03634 ↗
57. 10.1039/c2tc00450j10.1039/c2tc00450j ↗
58. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2013.03.01110.1016/j.nanoen.2013.03.011 ↗
59. 10.1007/s10854-009-0049-310.1007/s10854-009-0049-3 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.00910.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.009 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.cherd.2020.04.01310.1016/j.cherd.2020.04.013 ↗
62. Potential Roles of Ammonia in a Hydrogen Economy. U.S. Department of Energy, 2006. https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/articles/potential-roles-ammonia-hydrogen-economy (accessed 23 December 2023).
63. Eco-Profiles of the European Plastics Industry Hydrogen Chloride. Plastics Europe, 2005. https://plasticseurope.org/ (accessed 23 December 2023).
64. 10.1021/nn901868t10.1021/nn901868t ↗
65. 10.1002/aisy.20210004610.1002/aisy.202100046 ↗
66. 10.1109/JSEN.2020.296558010.1109/JSEN.2020.2965580 ↗
67. 10.1109/JSEN.2020.300457410.1109/JSEN.2020.3004574 ↗
68. 10.1002/aisy.20220042710.1002/aisy.202200427 ↗