journal article·2026-07Open access

Advanced machine learning assisted prediction of multi-fiber hybrid natural fiber/epoxy composites based on jute, coconut coir, banana, and pineapple leaf fibers

P. Sundaravadivel, S. Satheeskumar

Abstract

A growing demand for lightweight, high-performance and ecofriendly engineering materials, the use of renewable lignocellulosic materials as environmentally friendly substitutes to synthetic reinforcements has been paid considerable attention. In the present work, mechanical, thermal, morphological and machine learning based prediction properties of hybrid natural fiber reinforced epoxy composites are investigated which are prepared using alkaline treated jute fiber (JF), coconut coir (CC), banana fiber (BaF) and pineapple leaf fiber (PALF). Six hybrid composite materials containing a mixture of these 4 natural fibers were made using a hand lay-up technique with a constant 50 wt. % fiber loading. Tensile, flexural, impact and hardness tests were conducted on the composites, along with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), atomic force microscopy (AFM), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) to study their morphological, chemical, viscoelastic, surface and thermal properties. The surface roughness of fiber was also found to be significantly improved by alkaline treatment (5 wt. % NaOH), which increased the AFM average roughness (Ra) from 12.60 nm to 31.43 nm, which led to a better fiber–matrix interfacial adhesion. Sample S-5 (20 wt.% kJF + 20 wt.% CC + 10 wt.% PALF) showed the best overall performance with tensile strength of 85.8 MPa, flexural strength of 134.5 MPa, impact strength of 23.3 kJ/m 2 , and the Shore D hardness of 72.6. SEM images showed better bonding between the fibers and matrix and less pull-out, DMA showed higher storage modulus and a glass transition temperature of 65°C, TGA showed higher thermal stability with onset degradation temperature of 225°C and residual char yield of 13.7%. In order to investigate the predictive modeling ability, four regression algorithms were considered: Linear Regression (LR), Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Decision Tree Regression (DTR), and Random Forest Regression (RFR), which were tested with the experimentally obtained dataset. Of these models, the RFR model gave the best predictive performance with R 2 values of 0.968, 0.939, 0.941 and 0.962 for tensile strength, flexural strength, impact strength and hardness, respectively. The limited number of data makes the results of the machine learning only a proof of concept for the possibility of data-driven prediction for hybrid natural fiber composites. The results demonstrate how strategic fiber hybridization can enhance the properties of composites and offer a basis for future research using more data and more sophisticated machine learning models to improve the design of sustainable composite materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Scientific and Engineering Research Topics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. Moisture absorption in natural fiber plastic composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.027 ↗
2. Mechanical behavior of unidirectional flax fiber composites10.1080/15440478.2018.1448321 ↗
3. Mechanical and tribological behaviour of polymeric composites based on natural fibers10.1016/j.matdes.2012.07.014 ↗
4. Future aspect of natural fiber reinforced composite
5. Applications of biocomposite materials based on natural fibers10.1515/secm-2014-0088 ↗
6. Effect of natural fiber loading on mechanical properties of hybrid polyester composites10.1007/s12221-020-9853-4 ↗
7. Mechanical attributes and DMA of hybrid polyester composites10.1007/s12221-022-0179-2 ↗
8. Epoxy composites with jute, banana, coconut and Rubik's layer10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106151 ↗
9. Mechanical and morphological properties of sisal/banana/coir hybrid composites10.1007/s40430-019-1881-x ↗
10. Banana, pineapple and coir fly ash filled hybrid fiber epoxy composites10.1007/s10163-021-01196-6 ↗
11. Properties of jute/kenaf/banana reinforced epoxy hybrid composites10.1002/pc.26999 ↗
12. Predictive analysis of FDM via ML
13. Ductile-to-brittle transition in Fe-Al intermetallics via ML10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.135 ↗
14. Charpy impact toughness descriptors via ML10.1016/j.jmst.2022.05.051 ↗
15. Supervised ML: a review of classification techniques
16. ML algorithms to predict tensile strength of novel composites
17. Predicting flexural behavior via ML models10.3390/jcs9070333 ↗
18. Additive manufacturing of sandwiched ABS/glass composites via ML10.1002/pc.28823 ↗
19. Comprehensive review of natural fibers and composites10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101271 ↗
20. Mechanical properties of tamarind shell particles in epoxy
21. Mechanical characterization of hybrid green composites10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.05.132 ↗
22. ML applications in mechanical properties of composites10.1002/pc.29082 ↗
23. Continuous NF reinforced thermoplastics by surface modification10.1155/2013/685104 ↗
24. Improving mechanical properties of jute/epoxy composites10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00169-9 ↗
25. Effect of fiber treatment on sisal-reinforced epoxy composites10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00046-X ↗
26. Prosopis bark, banana and coconut coir reinforced bio composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108695 ↗
27. Comparative evaluation of jute, PALF and glass fiber composites
28. Jute, prosopis bark and kenaf fibers reinforced bio composites10.1007/s12221-021-1092-9 ↗
29. Kumar S., et al. Performance evaluation of hybrid kenaf– pineapple leaf–flax fiber reinforced vinyl ester composites: mechanical and thermal characteristics for diverse engineering prototype applications. J Nat Fib 23(1). doi:10.1080/15440478.2026.2629564.10.1080/15440478.2026.2629564 ↗
30. Natural fiber composites: ML methods review
31. Modelling and optimizing NF composite properties10.3390/fib9010006 ↗
32. ML models for predicting flexural strengths of FRP composites10.1016/j.hybadv.2025.100385 ↗
33. Tree-based ML for tensile strength retention of FRP composites
34. Mechanical performance of natural fiber-reinforced epoxy-hybrid composites
35. Mechanical properties of jute, kenaf, PALF-reinforced PP composites10.3390/polym15040830 ↗
36. Biodegradable hemp/PLA composites10.1177/0021998306069878 ↗
37. Lignin content effects on polypropylene composite properties10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02544 ↗
38. Alkali treatment effects on coir fiber reinforced-polymer composites10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.182 ↗
39. Performance of pineapple leaf fiber-natural rubber composites10.1002/app.24584 ↗
40. Physical, mechanical and thermal properties of jute/bamboo epoxy composites10.1016/j.proeng.2015.05.118 ↗
41. HDPE/hydroxyapatite/zeolite composite characterization10.14314/polimery.2024.9.4 ↗
42. Coconut shell fillers and pineapple fiber reinforced epoxy composites10.1007/s10965-024-04205-y ↗
43. Sustainable epoxy composites from hemp/pineapple/glass fibers for lightweight automobile panels
44. Predictive modeling of thermoplastic nanocomposites using machine learning algorithms10.1007/s44245-025-00134-2 ↗
45. Multi-attribute optimization of drilling Carbon-Innegra fiber–reinforced composites using Entropy-TOPSIS10.1007/s00170-025-16089-3 ↗
46. Chemical treatment effects on natural fiber properties
47. Eco design of automotive components using natural jute fiber composites10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.10.022 ↗
48. Wagner · 2018
49. Mechanical properties of hemp fiber reinforced cement10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2007.05.019 ↗
50. Pineapple leaf fiber/polyester composites with Ca(OH)2 treatment10.1088/2053-1591/ab2702 ↗
51. Rice husk filler effects on HDPE/NR blends10.1007/s10965-005-9040-8 ↗
52. Sisal fiber/bio-epoxy/fly-ash hybrid composites10.1177/00219983231209881 ↗
53. Degradability review of polymeric composites based on natural fiber s10.1016/j.matdes.2012.11.025 ↗
54. Effect of treatment on jute coir fiber reinforced hybrid PP composites10.1007/s12221-014-1023-0 ↗
55. Degradation behavior of NF reinforced polymer composites10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.198 ↗
56. Characterization of Furcraea foetida new natural fiber10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.099 ↗
57. Comparison of AI methods for prediction of mechanical properties10.1088/1757-899X/967/1/012031 ↗
58. Khas Khas Grass/Mesquite Bark Fillers in banana epoxy composites10.1007/s12221-023-00347-w ↗
59. Predictive modeling of tensile strength in aluminum alloys via ML10.3390/ma16227236 ↗
60. ML prediction of residual tensile strength of GFRP bars
61. FRP composites for aerospace, energy, marine applications10.1007/s42114-024-01192-y ↗
62. Water absorption and mechanical properties of lignocellulosic bio composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.01.013 ↗
63. Physico-mechanical properties of PALF and banana fiber hybrid PP composites10.1088/1757-899X/438/1/012027 ↗
64. Dynamic mechanical properties of long glass fiber TPU/PBT composites10.1002/pc.23902 ↗
65. Flexural and thermal properties of banana/PALF/glass hybrid composite
66. Fracture toughness prediction via supervised ML10.3390/polym14173619 ↗
67. and AI-assisted material design of steels10.1007/s12613-022-2595-0 ↗