An integrated experimental–computational framework for optimizing SLA 3D printing parameters via machine learning and genetic algorithms
Source abstract
Abstract
This study presents an integrated experimental and computational framework for identifying optimal stereolithography (SLA) printing process parameters. A full factorial experimental design with 81 printing configurations evaluated the effects of build direction, build orientation, layer thickness, and post-curing time. Results showed clear mechanical anisotropy in SLA printed parts. Flat-built specimens at 0° showed the highest tensile strength, while upright builds performed the worst. Thinner layers (0.1 mm) and longer post-curing (∼45 min) further improved ultimate tensile strength, yield strength, and Young’s modulus. Four machine learning models (XGBoost, GPR, SVR, and FFNN) were trained to predict ultimate tensile strength. XGBoost achieved the best performance (R 2 = 0.74, lowest RMSE, MAE). Based on this result, XGBoost was coupled with a genetic algorithm (GA) to optimize the printing conditions. The optimization reached stable convergence within 200 epochs. The optimal setting was flat build direction, 1° build orientation, 0.1 mm layer thickness and 33 minutes of post-curing. Under these conditions, the GA predicted an ultimate tensile strength of 40.62 MPa, a yield strength of 38.01 MPa, and a Young's modulus of 2.347 GPa. Experimental validation of the GA-optimized setting yielded an ultimate tensile strength of 45.9 MPa, a yield strength of 38.05 MPa, and a Young’s modulus of 2.795 GPa, which confirmed conservative yet reliable predictions. Thus, the XGBoost-GA framework provides a reliable route for data-driven optimizing of SLA process parameters.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Injection Molding Process and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Biomaterials adapted to vat photopolymerization in 3D printing: characteristics and medical applications10.3390/jfb15010007 ↗
2. 3D printing of polymer composites: materials, processing, and applications10.1016/j.matt.2021.10.018 ↗
3. Recent advances in the development of stereolithography-based additive manufacturing processes: a review of applications and challenges10.1016/j.bprint.2024.e00360 ↗
4. Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010 ↗
5. A critical review on 3D printed continuous fiber-reinforced composites: history, mechanism, materials and properties10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111476 ↗
6. 3D bioprinting in the era of 4th industrial revolution–insights, advanced applications, and future prospects10.1108/RPJ-02-2023-0041 ↗
7. Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers
8. 3D printing of magneto-active smart materials for advanced actuators and soft robotics applications10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112718 ↗
9. A miniature flow sensor fabricated by micro-stereolithography employing a magnetite/acrylic nanocomposite resin10.1016/j.sna.2011.03.058 ↗
10. Additive manufacturing in biomedical field: a critical review on fabrication method, materials used, applications, challenges, and future prospects10.1007/s40964-022-00362-y ↗
11. Evolution of 3D printing methods and materials for electrochemical energy storage10.1002/adma.202000556 ↗
12. Developments of 3D printing microfluidics and applications in chemistry and biology: a review10.1002/elan.201600043 ↗
13. Optimizing stereolithography throughput10.1016/S0278-6125(97)89099-1 ↗
14. Jacobs · 1992
15. A study on effect of variation of SLA process parameters over strength of Built model
16. Influence of layer thickness on mechanical properties in stereolithography10.1108/13552540610652456 ↗
17. How mechanical properties of stereolithography 3D prints are affected by UV curing
18. Study of the mechanical properties of photo-cured epoxy resin fabricated by stereolithograpy
19. Mechanical properties of a typical stereolithography resin
20. Influence of post curing conditions on the mechanical properties of stereolithographic photopolymers
21. Materials analysis of stereolithography resins for use in rapid manufacturing10.1023/B:JMSC.0000020010.73768.4a ↗
22. Establishment of process model for part strength in stereolithography10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.144 ↗
23. Optimization of stereolithography process parameters for part strength using design of experiments10.1007/s00170-004-2307-0 ↗
24. Predictions of the mechanical properties of unidirectional fibre composites by supervised machine learning10.1038/s41598-019-50144-w ↗
25. Artificial neural network based prediction of tensile strength of hybrid composites10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.356 ↗
26. Prediction of short fiber composite properties by an artificial neural network trained on an RVE database10.3390/fib9020008 ↗
27. A model for predicting the tensile strength of ultrafine glass fiber felts with mathematics and artificial neural network10.1080/00405000.2020.1779167 ↗
28. An artificial neural network model on tensile behavior of hybrid steel-PVA fiber reinforced concrete containing fly ash and slag power10.1007/s11709-020-0712-6 ↗
29. Determining optimal parameters for stereolithography processes via genetic algorithm10.1016/S0278-6125(00)88887-1 ↗
30. Optimizing process parameters for selective laser sintering based on neural network and genetic algorithm10.1007/s00170-008-1669-0 ↗
31. Recent advancements in stereolithography (SLA) and their optimization of process parameters for sustainable manufacturing10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100307 ↗
32. Unboxing machine learning models for concrete strength prediction using XAI10.1038/s41598-023-47169-7 ↗
33. Application of extreme gradient boosting method for evaluating the properties of episodic failure of borehole breakout
34. Research on prediction of rheological properties of steel-polypropylene fiber UHPC mortar based on ensemble machine learning10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140833 ↗
35. Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) for auto-estimation of resilient modulus of stabilized base materials
36. Prediction of the Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) of asymmetric friction stir welding using ensemble machine learning methods10.3390/pr11020391 ↗
37. Gaussian processes for machine learning. Adaptive computation and machine learning series
38. Hybridizing grid search and support vector regression to predict the compressive strength of fly ash concrete
39. An optimized support vector regression for prediction of bearing degradation10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108008 ↗
40. Machine learning based prediction models for spilt tensile strength of fiber reinforced recycled aggregate concrete
41. Feed-forward neural network prediction of the mechanical properties of sandcrete materials10.3390/s17061344 ↗
42. A comparison of activation functions in artificial neural networks
43. Multi-objective seismic design of BRBs-reinforced concrete buildings using genetic algorithms10.1007/s00158-021-02965-5 ↗
44. A review on genetic algorithm: past, present, and future10.1007/s11042-020-10139-6 ↗
45. On anisotropy, strain rate and size effects in vat photopolymerization based specimens
46. The mechanical properties of photopolymer prepared via 3D stereolithography printing: the effect of UV curing time and anisotropy
47. Kinetic study and new applications of UV radiation curing10.1002/marc.200290014 ↗
48. Curing of composite components by ultraviolet radiation: a review10.1002/pc.20166 ↗
49. Influence of curing modes on crosslink density in polymer structures10.1016/j.jdent.2004.01.012 ↗
50. Characteristics of photopolymeric material used in rapid prototypes Part I. Mechanical properties in the green state
51. The effect of cross linking density on the mechanical properties and structure of the epoxy polymers: molecular dynamics simulation10.1007/s00894-013-1906-9 ↗
52. Characteristics of photopolymeric material used in rapid prototypes Part II. Mechanical properties at post-cured state10.1016/S0924-0136(96)02816-6 ↗
53. Study of shrinkage strains in a stereolithography cured acrylic photopolymer resin10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00028-1 ↗
54. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? – arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature10.5194/gmd-7-1247-2014 ↗
55. Extreme gradient boosting algorithm for predicting shear strengths of rockfill materials10.1155/2022/9415863 ↗
56. Revolutionizing engineered cementitious composite materials (ECC): the impact of XGBoost-SHAP analysis on polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) based ECC predictions10.1007/s44242-024-00042-w ↗
57. Predictive modeling of tensile strength in aluminum alloys via machine learning10.3390/ma16227236 ↗
58. A review of machine learning with small and limited data10.1186/s40537-025-01346-9 ↗