journal article·2024-07Open access

A dynamic response prediction of ultra-high strain rates of composite materials based on a surrogate model

Yuheng Song, Meijiao Qu, Mengqi Li, Kai Liu, Hanrui Zhu, Weifeng He

Abstract

Based on the propagation of laser-induced tensile waves in materials and the principle of material ply cracking, nondestructive testing technology for measuring the interfacial bonding force of composite materials can be developed. The study of the ultra-high strain rate dynamic response model of composite materials under the action of laser shock waves is crucial to this technique. Therefore, this paper proposes a method for constructing a dynamic response prediction model for composites based on data and a physical model driven by comprehensively considering the strain rate effect of materials. The constructed model can accurately predict the peak velocity and duration of the initial pulse of the velocity curve under the condition of ultra-high strain rate. The relative error between the predicted and simulated peak values is within 3%, and the relative error between the predicted and simulated initial pulse durations is within 5%. In addition, laser impact experiments were conducted on specimens of various thicknesses to validate the accuracy of the predicted data at ultra-high strain rates. The results show that the relative errors between the predicted and experimental peak values are all within 2%, and the relative errors of the initial pulse duration are within 9%.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. On the mechanical behavior of laminated composite plates subjected to compression after impact tests10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.184 ↗
2. State-of-the-art laser adhesion test (LASAT)10.1080/10589759.2011.573550 ↗
3. Numerical study of laser ablation on aluminum for shock-wave applications: development of a suitable model by comparison with recent experiments10.1117/1.OE.56.1.011014 ↗
4. Numerical modeling of laser-induced shock experiments for the development of the adhesion test for bonded composite materials10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.032 ↗
5. Strain rate effect on the mechanical behavior of polyamide composites under compression loading10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.101 ↗
6. Characterization of 3D angle-interlock thermoplastic composites under high strain rate compression loadings10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.07.015 ↗
7. Experimental studies on the high strain rate compression response of woven graphite/epoxy composites at room and elevated temperatures10.1177/0731684404032019 ↗
8. High-strain-rate compression behavior and failure mechanism of 3D MWK carbon/epoxy composites10.1177/0954008315587126 ↗
9. Rate-related study on the ply orientation of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composite laminates10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105968 ↗
10. The compressive and tensile behavior of a 0/90 C fiber woven composite at high strain rates10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.073 ↗
11. Static and dynamic material properties of CFRP/epoxy laminates10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.003 ↗
12. Engineering properties of CFRP laminate under high strain rates10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.005 ↗
13. Effect of fiber orientation on the compressive response of plain weave carbon fiber/epoxy composites submitted to high strain rates10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.016 ↗
14. Luo Fangyun. Hopkinson bar techniques [M] pp:1-2.
15. Strain rate effect on CRALL under high-velocity impact by different projectiles10.1007/s40430-023-04031-1 ↗
16. Strain rate effect analysis of hybrid composites under the high-velocity impact10.1016/j.matpr.2022.07.082 ↗
17. High-velocity impact response of CFRP panels reinforced with stiffeners10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112392 ↗
18. Artificial neural network-based multiple-input multiple-output metamodel for prediction of design parameters for a high-speed rail viaduct
19. Zobeiry · 2021
20. Thai · 2022 · vol 38 · 448
21. Advances in computational intelligence of polymer composite materials: machine learning assisted modeling, analysis and design10.1007/s11831-021-09700-9 ↗
22. Exploring elastoplastic constitutive law of microstructured materials through artificial neural network—a mechanistic-based data-driven approach10.1115/1.4047208 ↗
23. Prediction of composite microstructure stress-strain curves using convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108509 ↗
24. A neural network enhanced system for learning nonlinear constitutive law and failure initiation criterion of composites using indirectly measurable data10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112658 ↗
25. Prediction of the behaviour of CFRPs against high velocity impact of solids employing an artificial neural network methodology10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.03.002 ↗
26. Experimental investigation and artificial intelligence-based modeling of the residual impact damage effect on the crashworthiness of braided Carbon/Kevlar tubes10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112247 ↗
27. Internal low-velocity impact damage prediction in CFRP laminates using surface profiles and machine learning10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109844 ↗
28. A data-driven approach to full-field nonlinear stress distribution and failure pattern prediction in composites using deep learning10.1016/j.cma.2022.115126 ↗
29. Numerical modeling of the effects of FRP thickness and stacking sequence on energy absorption of metal–FRP square tubes10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.03.038 ↗
30. ANN prediction model for composite plates against low velocity impact loads using finite element analysis10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.02.020 ↗
31. A deep learning-based composite design strategy for efficient selection of material and layup sequences from a given database10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109154 ↗
32. Quantitative relations between curing processes and local properties within thick composites based on simulation and machine learning10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111686 ↗
33. Finite element simulation of laser shock peening10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00035-3 ↗
34. Laser induced plasma characterization in direct and water confined regimes: new advances in experimental studies and numerical modelling10.1088/1361-6463/abc040 ↗
35. Physical study of laser‐produced plasma in confined geometry10.1063/1.346783 ↗
36. Smart sampling and incremental function learning for very large high dimensional data10.1016/j.neunet.2015.09.001 ↗
37. Laser induced plasma characterization in direct and water confined regimes: new advances in experimental studies and numerical modelling10.1088/1361-6463/abc040 ↗
38. Learning internal representations by back-propagating errors[J]. Parallel distributed processing
39. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
40. A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II[C]//Parallel Problem Solving from Nature PPSN VI
41. Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review10.1109/TEVC.2003.810758 ↗