Application of machine learning to object manipulation with bio-inspired microstructures
Source abstract
Abstract
Bioinspired fibrillar adhesives have been proposed for novel gripping systems with enhanced scalability and resource efficiency. Here, we propose an in-situ optical monitoring system of the contact signatures, coupled with image processing and machine learning. Visual features were extracted from the contact signature images recorded at maximum compressive preload and after lifting a glass object. The algorithm was trained to cope with several degrees of misalignment and with unbalanced weight distributions by off-center gripping. The system allowed an assessment of the picking process for objects of various mass (200, 300, and 400 g). Several classifiers showed a high accuracy of about 90% for successful prediction of attachment, depending on the mass of the object. The results promise improved reliability of handling objects, even in difficult situations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Tactile and Sensory Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Lindström · Ergonomia · 2008 · 30
2. SSRN
3. Fantoni · CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol · 2014 · 63 · 67910.1016/j.cirp.2014.05.006 ↗
4. Parness · J R Soc Interface · 2009 · 6 · 122310.1098/rsif.2009.0048 ↗
5. Lee · Nature · 2007 · 448 · 33810.1038/nature05968 ↗
6. Davies · Int J Adhesion Adhes · 2009 · 29 · 38010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.07.009 ↗
7. Murphy · ACS Appl Mater Interfaces · 2009 · 1 · 84910.1021/am8002439 ↗
8. King · 2014
9. Heepe · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2014 · 44 · 17310.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100458 ↗
10. Autumn · Nature · 2000 · 405 · 68110.1038/35015073 ↗
11. Autumn · 2016 · 245
12. Autumn · Phil Trans Math Phys Eng Sci · 2008 · 366 · 1575
13. Glick · IEEE Rob Autom Lett · 2018 · 3 · 90310.1109/LRA.2018.2792688 ↗
14. Pang · 2021 · 736
15. Hawkes · 2015 · 2305
16. Hawkes · Int J Robot Res · 2016 · 35 · 94310.1177/0278364915584645 ↗
17. Dadkhah · 2016 · 1006
18. Jiang · 2017
19. Song · 2014 · 4624
20. Autumn · Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · 2002 · 99 · 1225210.1073/pnas.192252799 ↗
21. Purtov · ACS Appl Mater Interfaces · 2015 · 7 · 2412710.1021/acsami.5b07287 ↗
22. Sameoto · J Adhes Sci Technol · 2012 · 26 · 264110.1080/01694243.2012.701463 ↗
23. Barreau · Adv Funct Mater · 2016 · 26 · 468710.1002/adfm.201600652 ↗
24. Booth · Adv Mater Interfac · 2018 · 510.1002/admi.201800272 ↗
25. Bacca · J Mech Phys Solid · 2016 · 42810.1016/j.jmps.2016.04.008 ↗
26. Tinnemann · Adv Funct Mater · 2019 · 29
27. Booth · Appl Phys Lett · 2021 · 11910.1063/5.0073181 ↗
28. v Eason · Bioinspiration Biomimetics · 2015 · 1010.1088/1748-3190/10/1/016013 ↗
29. Thiemecke · Adv Funct Mater · 2020 · 30
30. Samri · 2022
31. Hensel · ACS Appl Mater Interfaces · 2021 · 13 · 1942210.1021/acsami.1c00978 ↗
32. Booth · J R Soc Interface · 2019 · 1610.1098/rsif.2019.0239 ↗
33. Suresh · J R Soc Interface · 2021 · 1810.1098/rsif.2020.0730 ↗