Tailoring grain boundary network for optimizing tensile behavior of 316L stainless steel
Source abstract
Abstract
This study systematically investigated the optimization of grain boundary engineering (GBE) in 316L stainless steel via thermomechanical processing and its influence on the tensile properties at both room and elevated temperatures. The optimal GBE processing window was established as: 4-5% tensile pre-deformation followed by heat treatment at 1025-1100 °C for 30 min to 2 h. This treatment successfully increased the fraction of low-Σ coincidence site lattice (CSL) boundaries to 85.6%, within which Σ3 n twin-related boundaries accounted for up to 97.4%, and led to the formation of large grain clusters with an average size exceeding 300 μm. Mechanical property tests demonstrated that while the GBE treatment significantly enhanced the material's fracture elongation (with a maximum increase of ∼18% at room temperature), it was accompanied by a systematic reduction in both yield strength (by approximately 10%) and ultimate tensile strength (by approximately 4%). The cause of this strength-ductility trade-off lies in the widely distributed Σ3 twin boundaries, which promote dislocation transmission across grains and coordinate deformation, thereby extending the uniform deformation stage, while simultaneously weakening the effects of work hardening and grain boundary strengthening. Furthermore, the study revealed an inhibitory effect of GBE on serrated yielding behavior.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Machine Learning in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Effect of grain boundary engineering on electrochemical and intergranular corrosion of 316L stainless steel10.1016/j.corsci.2025.113050 ↗
2. A micromechanical analysis of intergranular stress corrosion cracking of an irradiated austenitic stainless steel10.1016/j.actamat.2020.116482 ↗
3. The role of CSL boundaries for the creep ductility of copper canisters for spent nuclear fuel10.1007/s10853-025-11837-y ↗
4. Recent developments in stainless steels10.1016/j.mser.2009.03.001 ↗
5. Grain boundary engineering: historical perspective and future prospects10.1007/s10853-011-5393-z ↗
6. Iterative thermomechanical processing of alloy 600 for improved resistance to corrosion and stress corrosion cracking10.1016/j.actamat.2016.05.009 ↗
7. In situ EBSD observation of grain boundary character distribution evolution during thermomechanical process used for grain boundary engineering of 304 austenitic stainless steel10.1016/j.matchar.2017.06.032 ↗
8. Twin-induced grain boundary engineering for 316 austenitic stainless steel10.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.030 ↗
9. Grain boundary engineering of large-size 316 stainless steel via warm-rolling for improving resistance to intergranular attack10.1016/j.matlet.2018.09.111 ↗
10. Control of grain boundary connectivity based on fractal analysis for improvement of intergranular corrosion resistance in SUS316L austenitic stainless steel10.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.075 ↗
11. Correlation of grain boundary connectivity with grain boundary character distribution in austenitic stainless steel10.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.048 ↗
12. Three-dimensional study of grain boundary engineering effects on intergranular stress corrosion cracking of 316 stainless steel in high temperature water10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.10.004 ↗
13. Achieving strength–ductility synergy and enhanced intergranular corrosion resistance in the Inconel 625 alloy via twin boundary tailoring10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.02.012 ↗
14. An optimal grain boundary engineering approach to improving the mechanical properties of FeCoCrNi high-entropy alloys at different temperatures10.1016/j.msea.2025.148344 ↗
15. Twin boundary and grain boundary engineering to enhance mechanical strength of nanotwinned Cu10.1016/j.msea.2024.147719 ↗
16. The highly twinned grain boundary network formation during grain boundary engineering10.1016/j.matlet.2014.06.166 ↗
17. Effect of nitrogen content on grain boundary engineering and corrosion resistance of 316LN stainless steel10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.02.139 ↗
18. Unraveling the origin of twin related domains and grain boundary evolution during grain boundary engineering10.1016/j.actamat.2017.10.007 ↗
19. Three-dimensional characteristics of the grain boundary networks of conventional and grain boundary engineered 316L stainless steel10.1016/j.matchar.2017.09.026 ↗
20. Novel role of thermomechanical grain boundary engineering in the microstructure evolution of austenitic stainless steel10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.03.056 ↗
21. Grain orientation statistics of grain-clusters and the propensity of multiple-twinning during grain boundary engineering10.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.079 ↗
22. Optimization of grain boundary character distribution for intergranular corrosion resistant 304 stainless steel by twin-induced grain boundary engineering10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00064-2 ↗
23. Twin boundaries: strong or weak?10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.07.037 ↗
24. Grain boundary dominated plasticity in metallic materials
25. New insights into ductility improvement of a nickel-based superalloy through grain boundary engineering10.1016/j.msea.2024.146786 ↗
26. Significantly enhancing elevated-temperature strength and ductility of a FeMnCoCr high-entropy alloy via grain boundary engineering: exploring multi-deformation mechanisms10.1016/j.msea.2023.145547 ↗
27. Cooperative effect of strength and ductility processed by thermomechanical treatment for Cu–Al–Ni alloy10.1016/j.msea.2022.143485 ↗
28. The effect of grain boundary character distribution on the mechanical properties at different strain rates of a 316L stainless steel10.1007/s10853-017-1695-0 ↗
29. A possibility to synchronously improve the high-temperature strength and ductility in face-centered cubic metals through grain boundary engineering10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.06.026 ↗
30. The structure of high-angle grain boundaries10.1016/0001-6160(66)90168-4 ↗
31. Experimental investigation of novel fast–ageing treatments for AA6082 in supersaturated solid solution state10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.151934 ↗
32. Formation of annealing twins in f.c.c. crystals10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00336-9 ↗
33. Three-dimensional study of twin boundaries in conventional and grain boundary-engineered 316L stainless steels10.1557/jmr.2018.133 ↗
34. Microstructure and corrosion resistance of Z3CN20.09M stainless steels after different thermo-mechanical processing10.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154300 ↗
35. Microstructural evolution during grain boundary engineering of low to medium stacking fault energy fcc materials10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00090-3 ↗
36. Studies on the evolution of annealing twins during recrystallization and grain growth in highly rolled pure nickel10.1016/j.msea.2014.11.023 ↗
37. Optimization of grain boundary character distribution for intergranular corrosion resistant 304 stainless steel by twin-induced grain boundary engineering10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00064-2 ↗
38. The effect of initial grain size and temperature on the tensile properties of magnesium alloy AZ31 sheet10.1016/j.msea.2012.03.107 ↗
39. Mechanical properties and dynamic strain aging behavior of Zr–1.5 Nb–0.4 Sn–0.2 Fe alloy10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.03.076 ↗
40. TEM in situ deformation study of the interaction of lattice dislocations with grain boundaries in metals10.1080/01418619008244340 ↗
41. Overcoming the strength-ductility trade-off in additively manufactured super austenitic stainless steel matrix composites via grain boundary engineering and heterogeneous structures10.1016/j.msea.2025.147799 ↗
42. Tensile and creep behavior of 316L austenite stainless steel at elevated temperatures: experiment and crystal plasticity modeling10.1007/s10409-023-23091-x ↗
43. Cryogenic and high temperature tensile properties of 316L steel additively manufactured by laser powder bed fusion10.1016/j.msea.2024.146461 ↗
44. A model for the Portevin-Le Chatelier effect in substitutional alloys10.1016/0001-6160(72)90028-4 ↗
45. Solute strengthening of both mobile and forest dislocations: the origin of dynamic strain aging in fcc metals10.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.027 ↗
46. Grain boundary sliding in copper and its relation to cavity formation during creep10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.100 ↗
47. Evaluation of grain boundary network and improvement of intergranular cracking resistance in 316L stainless steel after grain boundary engineering10.3390/ma12020242 ↗
48. Effect of initial grain sizes on the grain boundary network during grain boundary engineering in Alloy 69010.1557/jmr.2013.37 ↗
49. Effect of the pre-existing carbides on the grain boundary network during grain boundary engineering in a nickel based alloy10.1016/j.matchar.2014.02.011 ↗
50. Energy of slip transmission and nucleation at grain boundaries10.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.032 ↗
51. Transfer or blockage: unraveling the interaction between deformation twinning and grain boundary in tantalum under shock loading with molecular dynamics10.1016/j.jmst.2023.01.039 ↗
52. Grain boundary engineering and its implications on corrosion behavior of equiatomic CoCrFeMnNi high entropy alloy10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161500 ↗
53. On grain boundary engineering for a 316L austenitic stainless steel10.3390/met12122185 ↗
54. Dynamic mechanisms of strengthening and softening of coherent twin boundary via dislocation pile-up and cross-slip10.1080/21663831.2022.2065892 ↗
55. Precipitation formation on∑ 5 and∑ 7 grain boundaries in 316L stainless steel and their roles on intergranular corrosion10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116822 ↗
56. Effect of grain size on thermal and mechanical stability of austenite in metastable austenitic stainless steel10.2355/isijinternational.53.1224 ↗
57. Serration and noise behaviors in materials10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.06.004 ↗
58. Serrated plastic flow10.1007/BF02743993 ↗
59. Effect of tensile pre-strain on mechanical properties of austenitic 301 stainless steel10.1007/s11665-023-08832-2 ↗
60. Single vacancies at Σ5, Σ9 and Σ11 grain boundaries of copper and the geometrical factors that affect their site preference10.1016/j.jpcs.2022.110833 ↗