journal article·2023-02-28Open access

Molecular Bridges Link Monolayers of Hexagonal Boron Nitride during Dielectric Breakdown

Alok Ranjan, Sean J. O’Shea, Andrea Padovani, Tong Su, Paolo La Torraca, Yee Sin Ang, Manveer Singh Munde, Chenhui Zhang, Xixiang Zhang, Michel Bosman, Nagarajan Raghavan, Kin Leong Pey

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide We use conduction atomic force microscopy (CAFM) to examine the soft breakdown of monocrystalline hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) and relate the observations to the defect generation and dielectric degradation in the h-BN by charge transport simulations and density functional theory (DFT) calculations. A modified CAFM approach is adopted, whereby 500 × 500 nm 2 to 3 × 3 μm 2 sized metal/h-BN/metal capacitors are fabricated on 7 to 19 nm-thick h-BN crystal flakes and the CAFM tip is placed on top of the capacitor as an electrical probe. Current–voltage ( I-V ) sweeps and time-dependent dielectric breakdown measurements indicate that defects are generated gradually over time, leading to a progressive increase in current prior to dielectric breakdown. Typical leakage currents are around 0.3 A/cm 2 at a 10 MV/cm applied field. DFT calculations indicate that many types of defects could be generated and contribute to the leakage current. However, three defects created from adjacent boron and nitrogen monovacancies exhibit the lowest formation energy. These three defects form molecular bridges between two adjacent h-BN layers, which in turn “electrically shorts” the two layers at the defect location. Electrical shorting between layers is manifested in charge transport simulations, which show that the I-V data can only be correctly modeled by incorporating a decrease in effective electrical thickness of the h-BN as well as the usual increase in trap density, which, alone, cannot explain the experimental data. An alternative breakdown mechanism, namely, the physical removal of h-BN layers under soft breakdown, appears unlikely given the h-BN is mechanically confined by the electrodes and no change in AFM topography is observed after breakdown. High-resolution transmission electron microscope micrographs of the breakdown location show a highly localized (<1 nm) breakdown path extending between the two electrodes, with the h-BN layers fractured and disrupted, but not removed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Graphene research and applications · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division of Nano-and-Bio Physics, Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg 41296, Sweden

Engineering Product Development, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore 487372, Singapore

Agency for Science Technology and Research, Institute of Materials Research and Engineering, 2 Fusionopolis Way, Singapore 138634, Singapore

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Enzo Ferrari, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena 41125, Italy

Science, Mathematics and Technology, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore 487372, Singapore

Dipartimento di Scienze e Metodi dell’Ingegneria, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia 41125, Italy

Materials Science Centre and Department of Physics, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg 35032, Germany

Physical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia

Department of Material Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117575, Singapore

Funding

Ministry of Education - Singapore · Chalmers Tekniska H??gskola · National Supercomputing Centre Singapore · German Research Foundation

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20210158910.1002/adma.202101589 ↗
2. 10.1038/nnano.2010.17210.1038/nnano.2010.172 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-017-00810-210.1038/s41467-017-00810-2 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.366204310.1063/1.3662043 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.349284310.1063/1.3492843 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41928-020-0444-610.1038/s41928-020-0444-6 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41598-022-18320-710.1038/s41598-022-18320-7 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.0c2256110.1021/acsami.0c22561 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsami.8b1100310.1021/acsami.8b11003 ↗
10. 10.1021/nn506645q10.1021/nn506645q ↗
11. 10.1002/aelm.20170050610.1002/aelm.201700506 ↗
12. 10.1021/nl300220510.1021/nl3002205 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsaelm.1c0046910.1021/acsaelm.1c00469 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.0c1710710.1021/acsami.0c17107 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.6b0642510.1021/acsami.6b06425 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.7b1094810.1021/acsami.7b10948 ↗
17. 10.1002/adfm.20190065710.1002/adfm.201900657 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsaelm.9b0081610.1021/acsaelm.9b00816 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0262510.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02625 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.493913110.1063/1.4939131 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.7b0941710.1021/acsami.7b09417 ↗
22. 10.1038/nmat113410.1038/nmat1134 ↗
23. 10.1038/s42005-018-0097-110.1038/s42005-018-0097-1 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.502204010.1063/1.5022040 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41598-018-21138-x10.1038/s41598-018-21138-x ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.7b1845410.1021/acsami.7b18454 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.497255510.1063/1.4972555 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.04542510.1103/PhysRevB.97.045425 ↗
29. 10.1109/IEDM.1999.82418710.1109/IEDM.1999.824187 ↗
30. 10.1109/IEDM.2000.90437910.1109/IEDM.2000.904379 ↗
31. 10.1088/1361-648X/ab4e5d10.1088/1361-648X/ab4e5d ↗
32. 10.1038/s41699-022-00340-610.1038/s41699-022-00340-6 ↗
33. 10.1109/RELPHY.2001.92293110.1109/RELPHY.2001.922931 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0435510.1021/acs.jpcc.9b04355 ↗
35. 10.1109/TED.2011.215882510.1109/TED.2011.2158825 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10825-013-0526-z10.1007/s10825-013-0526-z ↗
37. Applied Materials, https://www.appliedmaterials.com/us/en/semiconductor/ginestra-software.html (accessed 20230126).
38. 10.1016/j.microrel.2012.06.00710.1016/j.microrel.2012.06.007 ↗
39. 10.1109/LED.2002.80375110.1109/LED.2002.803751 ↗
40. 10.1109/IEDM.2005.160936410.1109/IEDM.2005.1609364 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.475699310.1063/1.4756993 ↗
42. 10.1109/IRPS.2009.517330110.1109/IRPS.2009.5173301 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.510049510.1063/1.5100495 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.09410410.1103/PhysRevB.75.094104 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.06410110.1103/PhysRevB.97.064101 ↗
46. 10.1063/5.008318910.1063/5.0083189 ↗
47. 10.1039/C7CS00828G10.1039/C7CS00828G ↗
48. 10.1038/s42254-021-00389-010.1038/s42254-021-00389-0 ↗
49. 10.1038/s41598-022-16199-y10.1038/s41598-022-16199-y ↗
50. 10.1109/IEDM.2001.97944610.1109/IEDM.2001.979446 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.1311510.1103/PhysRevB.48.13115 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1425110.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
54. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
55. 10.1109/TED.2019.290003010.1109/TED.2019.2900030 ↗
56. 10.1098/rspa.1950.018410.1098/rspa.1950.0184 ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRevB.15.98910.1103/PhysRevB.15.989 ↗
58. 10.1063/1.366219510.1063/1.3662195 ↗
59. 10.1109/TED.2018.287451310.1109/TED.2018.2874513 ↗