journal article·2021-10-26Open access

Design, Theoretical, and Experimental Investigation of Tensile-Strained Germanium Quantum-Well Laser Structure

Mantu K. Hudait, Felipe Murphy-Armando, Dzianis Saladukha, Michael B. Clavel, Patrick S. Goley, Deepam Maurya, Shuvodip Bhattacharya, Tomasz J. Ochalski

ACS Applied Electronic Materials· Volume 3· Issue 10

Abstract

Strain and band gap engineered epitaxial germanium (ε-Ge) quantum-well (QW) laser structures were investigated on GaAs substrates theoretically and experimentally for the first time. In this design, we exploit the ability of an InGaAs layer to simultaneously provide tensile strain in Ge (0.7–1.96%) and sufficient optical and carrier confinement. The direct band-to-band gain, threshold current density (Jth), and loss mechanisms that dominate in the ε-Ge QW laser structure were calculated using first-principles-based 30-band k·p electronic structure theory, at injected carrier concentrations from 3 × 1018 to 9 × 1019 cm–3. The higher strain in the ε-Ge QW increases the gain at higher wavelengths; however, a decreasing thickness is required by higher strain due to critical layer thickness for avoiding strain relaxation. In addition, we predict that a Jth of 300 A/cm2 can be reduced to <10 A/cm2 by increasing strain from 0.2% to 1.96% in ε-Ge lasing media. The measured room-temperature photoluminescence spectroscopy demonstrated direct band gap optical emission, from the conduction band at the Γ-valley to heavy-hole (0.6609 eV) from 1.6% tensile-strained Ge/In0.24Ga0.76As heterostructure grown by molecular beam epitaxy, is in agreement with the value calculated using 30-band k·p theory. The detailed plan-view transmission electron microscopic (TEM) analysis of 0.7% and 1.2% tensile-strained ε-Ge/InGaAs structures exhibited well-controlled dislocations within each ε-Ge layer. The measured dislocation density is below 4 × 106 cm–2 for the 1.2% ε-Ge layer, which is an upper bound, suggesting the superior ε-Ge material quality. Structural analysis of the experimentally realistic 1.95% biaxially strained In0.28Ga0.72As/13 nm ε-Ge/In0.28Ga0.72As QW structure demonstrated a strained Ge/In0.28Ga0.72As heterointerface with minimal relaxation using X-ray and cross-sectional TEM analysis. Therefore, our monolithic integration of a strained Ge QW laser structure on GaAs and ultimately the transfer of the process to the Si substrate via an InGa(Al)As/III–V buffer architecture would provide a significant step toward photonic technology based on strained Ge on a Si platform.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Photonic and Optical Devices · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Advanced Devices & Sustainable Energy Laboratory (ADSEL), Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States

Tyndall National Institute, Lee Maltings, Cork T12 R5CP, Republic of Ireland

The Centre for Advanced Photonics & Process Analysis, Munster Technological University at Tyndall National Institute, Cork T12R5CP, Republic of Ireland

Center for Energy Harvesting Materials and Systems (CEHMS), Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States

Funding

Science Foundation Ireland · Division of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.471454010.1063/1.4714540 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41566-020-0601-510.1038/s41566-020-0601-5 ↗
3. 10.1364/OPN.27.1.00003210.1364/OPN.27.1.000032 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b0025810.1021/acsphotonics.6b00258 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.496614110.1063/1.4966141 ↗
6. 10.1088/1468-6996/15/1/01460310.1088/1468-6996/15/1/014603 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b0003010.1021/acsphotonics.9b00030 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41467-017-02026-w10.1038/s41467-017-02026-w ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0132710.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01327 ↗
10. 10.1002/lpor.20170006310.1002/lpor.201700063 ↗
11. 10.1109/JSTQE.2018.283265410.1109/JSTQE.2018.2832654 ↗
12. 10.1109/LPT.2017.277122210.1109/LPT.2017.2771222 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41586-020-2150-y10.1038/s41586-020-2150-y ↗
14. 10.1109/JSTQE.2018.285459510.1109/JSTQE.2018.2854595 ↗
15. 10.1002/jbio.20180014110.1002/jbio.201800141 ↗
16. 10.1109/TMI.2019.293776010.1109/TMI.2019.2937760 ↗
17. 10.1117/1.JBO.20.3.03090110.1117/1.JBO.20.3.030901 ↗
18. 10.1038/nature1645410.1038/nature16454 ↗
19. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.16710.1038/nphoton.2010.167 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.10665210.1063/1.106652 ↗
21. 10.1109/JSTQE.2013.224757310.1109/JSTQE.2013.2247573 ↗
22. 10.1038/nature0327310.1038/nature03273 ↗
23. 10.1038/nature0420410.1038/nature04204 ↗
24. 10.1364/OL.35.00067910.1364/OL.35.000679 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.327930710.1063/1.3279307 ↗
26. 10.1117/12.204425810.1117/12.2044258 ↗
27. Wada K. · 201510.1002/9783527650200 ↗
28. 10.1109/JPHOT.2012.222169210.1109/JPHOT.2012.2221692 ↗
29. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.32110.1038/nphoton.2014.321 ↗
30. 10.1073/pnas.110796810810.1073/pnas.1107968108 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.5b0738510.1021/acsami.5b07385 ↗
32. 10.1109/LPT.2007.89542910.1109/LPT.2007.895429 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.152586510.1063/1.1525865 ↗
34. 10.1364/OE.15.01127210.1364/OE.15.011272 ↗
35. 10.1109/JEDS.2015.239474310.1109/JEDS.2015.2394743 ↗
36. FIMMWAVE/FIMMPROP by Photon Design Ltd. http://www.photond.com (accessed March 2020).
37. 10.1038/srep0696410.1038/srep06964 ↗
38. 10.1021/am405988f10.1021/am405988f ↗
39. 10.1117/12.221836410.1117/12.2218364 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.19530410.1103/PhysRevB.97.195304 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsami.5b0581410.1021/acsami.5b05814 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.04405210.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.044052 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.166700610.1063/1.1667006 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.17740410.1103/PhysRevLett.110.177404 ↗
45. 10.1063/1.9620610.1063/1.96206 ↗
46. Ayers J. E. · 2017
47. 10.1063/1.34639010.1063/1.346390 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.33907810.1063/1.339078 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.35403310.1063/1.354033 ↗
50. 10.1063/1.10024610.1063/1.100246 ↗
51. 10.1063/1.194420810.1063/1.1944208 ↗
52. Hwang, D.; Bhat, R.; Schwarz, S.; Chen, C. In Partial Dislocations and Critical Thicknesses for Strained Layer Relaxation MRS Proceedings; Cambridge Univ Press, 1992; p 421.10.1557/PROC-263-421 ↗
53. 10.1063/1.10631610.1063/1.106316 ↗
54. 10.1016/0038-1101(78)90210-110.1016/0038-1101(78)90210-1 ↗
55. 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b0042910.1021/acsphotonics.6b00429 ↗
56. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.6710.1038/nphoton.2013.67 ↗
57. 10.1364/OE.20.01131610.1364/OE.20.011316 ↗
58. 10.1364/OL.34.00173810.1364/OL.34.001738 ↗
59. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.11110.1038/nphoton.2012.111 ↗
60. Swaminathan V. · 1991
61. 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.898910.1103/PhysRevB.45.8989 ↗
62. 10.1088/1742-6596/281/1/01202110.1088/1742-6596/281/1/012021 ↗
63. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.19520810.1103/PhysRevB.74.195208 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevB.34.539010.1103/PhysRevB.34.5390 ↗
65. 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.1120410.1103/PhysRevB.48.11204 ↗
66. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.24531610.1103/PhysRevB.72.245316 ↗