journal article·2019-07-23

Physically Unclonable Function by an All-Printed Carbon Nanotube Network

Dong-Il Moon, Andrew Rukhin, Ram P. Gandhiraman, Beomseok Kim, Sunjin Kim, Myeong-Lok Seol, Kyung Jean Yoon, Dongil Lee, Jessica Koehne, Jin-Woo Han, M. Meyyappan

Publisher page

Abstract

The emerging Internet of things (IoT) demands not only new device technologies but also strengthening the security of things in order to prevent tampering and hacking. Humans have unique characteristics such as fingerprints, irises, and facial features, allowing the use of biometric authentication technology. IoT related devices in the future would likewise need similar identification methods for security. We demonstrate an analog version of physically unclonable function (PUF) using a carbon nanotube (CNT) network to implement a unique identification for this purpose. A plurality of electrodes dispersed around a single CNT network, formed by printing on a flexible substrate, allows local segmented resistance to be read. A pattern of resistances across an arbitrary pair of electrodes in the CNT network is naturally random as the resistance depends strongly on the type, diameter, and length of the nanotubes and the link and angle between them, and consequently it is nearly impossible to predict or duplicate them. The relative difference from the internal resistance of the CNT network is standardized and visualized, which is demonstrated here to be robust and stable against tampering attacks such as high-temperature baking, light illumination, and radiation exposure. Therefore, the present all-printed analog version of CNT PUF can be implemented by simple and low-cost fabrication to provide identification of things on-demand for the IoT era.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States

Funding

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Bonomi J. · 1853
2. 10.1109/MSECP.2003.119320910.1109/MSECP.2003.1193209 ↗
3. 2014
4. 10.1016/j.clsr.2009.11.00810.1016/j.clsr.2009.11.008 ↗
5. Voas J. M. · 2016
6. Tehranipoor M. · 2012 · 978144198010.1007/978-1-4419-8080-9 ↗
7. Skorobogatov S. P. · 2005
8. 10.1109/JPROC.2005.86242310.1109/JPROC.2005.862423 ↗
9. Lee, J. W.; Lim, D.; Gassend, B.; Suh, G. E.; van Dijk, M.; Devadas, S. A technique to build a secret key in integrated circuits for identification and authentication applications. In Symposium on VLSI Circuits; IEEE: Honolulu, HI, USA, 2004; pp 176–179.
10. 10.1109/JPROC.2014.232051610.1109/JPROC.2014.2320516 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.107437610.1126/science.1074376 ↗
12. 10.1038/436475a10.1038/436475a ↗
13. Devadas, S.; Suh, G. E. Physical Unclonable Functions for Device Authentication and Secret Key Generation. In 44th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference; IEEE: San Diego, CA, USA, 2007; pp 9–14.
14. Tuyls, P.; Batina, L. RFID-Tags for Anti-counterfeiting. In Cryptographers’ Track at the RSA Conference; San Jose, CA, USA, 2006; pp 115–131.10.1007/11605805_8 ↗
15. Guajardo, J.; Kumar, S. S.; Schrijen, G.J.; Tuyls, P. FPGA Intrinsic PUFs and Their Use for IP Protection. In International Conference on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems; Leuven, Belgium, 2012; pp 63–80.10.1007/978-3-540-74735-2_5 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41928-018-0039-710.1038/s41928-018-0039-7 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0333810.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03338 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0665810.1021/acsnano.7b06658 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.08.02210.1016/j.orgel.2017.08.022 ↗
20. 10.1038/nnano.2016.110.1038/nnano.2016.1 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0756810.1021/acsnano.7b07568 ↗
22. 10.1038/nnano.2007.8910.1038/nnano.2007.89 ↗
23. 10.1039/c0jm00264j10.1039/c0jm00264j ↗
24. 10.1021/nl048435y10.1021/nl048435y ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20150495810.1002/adma.201504958 ↗
26. 10.1002/smll.20120325210.1002/smll.201203252 ↗
27. 10.1021/nl052406l10.1021/nl052406l ↗
28. 10.1021/nl803857910.1021/nl8038579 ↗
29. 10.1021/nl060854310.1021/nl0608543 ↗
30. 10.1002/adfm.20170556810.1002/adfm.201705568 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0211810.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02118 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.494379210.1063/1.4943792 ↗
33. Rukhin A. · 2010
34. Hollander M. · 1999
35. 10.1109/TNS.2010.207851510.1109/TNS.2010.2078515 ↗
36. Avery, K.; Finchel, J.; Mee, J.; Kemp, W.; Netzer, R.; Elkins, D.; Zufelt, B.; Alexander, D. Total Dose Test Results for CubeSat Electronics. In IEEE Radiation Effects Data Workshop; Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2011; pp 1–8.10.1109/REDW.2010.6062504 ↗