Developing an Efficient Forward Design Method for Co Post-CMP Cleaning Formulations Based on Nanoparticle Removal Mechanisms
Source abstract
Abstract
Cobalt (Co) with its low resistivity, superior adhesion property, and void-free seamless fill ability pledges to transform the landscape of integrated circuits in many areas, especially in interconnects and logic contacts. The cleaning of Co surfaces after chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) is the indispensable step since a significant number of defects that include SiO 2 nanoparticles, organic residues, and severe corrosion could occur. The present work proposes an efficient forward design method for Co post-CMP cleaning formulations based on nanoparticle removal mechanisms. Each essential component including the pH regulator, complexing agent, corrosion inhibitor, and surfactant was determined in sequence according to every performance point and mechanism analysis, simultaneously oriented by particle removal efficiencies. Furthermore, the nanoparticle removal mechanisms were elucidated via Derjaguin–Landau–Verwey–Overbeek theory calculations, adsorption isotherm analysis, adhesion force tests, surface energy investigation, zeta potential measurements, and other characterizations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Tribology in Advanced Equipment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Funding
Tsinghua University
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Huang, H.; Hsieh, H.; Jeng, S.; Tao, H.; Cao, M.; Mii, Y. A new enhancement layer to improve copper interconnect performance.IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference, 2010; pp 1–3.10.1109/IITC.2010.5510762 ↗
2. Mont, F.; Zhang, X.; Wang, W.; Kelly, J.; Standaert, T.; Quon, R.; Ryan, E. Cobalt interconnect on same copper barrier process integration at the 7nm node.IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference, 2017; pp 1–3.10.1109/IITC-AMC.2017.7968971 ↗
3. Wang, L.; Mishra, A.; Cruz, B.; Wen, R. Cobalt polishing slurries for 10 nm and beyond.Proceedings of International Conference on Planarization/CMP Technology, 2014; pp 233.10.1109/ICPT.2014.7017287 ↗
4. Nogami, T.; Maniscalco, J.; Madan, A.; Flaitz, P.; DeHaven, P.; Parks, C.; Tai, L.; Lawrence, B.; Davis, R.; Murphy, R.; Shaw, T.; Cohen, S.; Hu, C.K.; Cabral, C.; Chiang, S.; Kelly, J.; Zaitz, M.; Schmatz, J.; Choi, S.; Tsumura, K.; Penny, C.; Chen, H.C.; Canaperi, D.; Vo, T.; Ito, F.; Straten, O.; Simon, A.; Rhee, S.H.; Kim, B.Y.; Bolom, T.; Ryan, V.; Ma, P.; Ren, J.; Aubuchon, J.; Fine, J.; Kozlowski, P.; Spooner, T.; Edelstein, D. CVD Co and its application to Cu damascene interconnections.IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conference, 2010; pp 1–3.10.1109/IITC.2010.5510584 ↗
5. 10.1149/2.013312jes10.1149/2.013312jes ↗
6. 10.1149/2162-8777/aba33110.1149/2162-8777/aba331 ↗
7. 10.1149/2.0111709jss10.1149/2.0111709jss ↗
8. 10.1149/2.0011905jss10.1149/2.0011905jss ↗
9. 10.1147/rd.425.056710.1147/rd.425.0567 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00170-023-10824-410.1007/s00170-023-10824-4 ↗
11. 10.1149/2.0021905jss10.1149/2.0021905jss ↗
12. 10.1149/2162-8777/acce0510.1149/2162-8777/acce05 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.mssp.2023.10741010.1016/j.mssp.2023.107410 ↗
14. Tseng, W.T.; Canaperi, D.; Ticknor, A.; Devarapalli, V.; Tai, L.; Economikos, L.; MacDougal, J.; Bunke, C.; Angyal, M.; Muncy, J.; Chen, X.; Zhang, J.; Fang, Q.; Zheng, J. Post Cu CMP cleaning process evaluation for 32nm and 22nm technology nodes.SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference, 2012; pp 57–62.10.1109/ASMC.2012.6212868 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.03.23010.1016/j.apsusc.2016.03.230 ↗
16. Moumen, N.; Guarrera, M.; Piboontum, C.; Busnaina, A. Contact and non contact post-CMP cleaning of thermal oxide silicon wafers.Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference and Workshop, 1999; pp 250–253.10.1109/ASMC.1999.798236 ↗
17. 10.1149/1.221728710.1149/1.2217287 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.145859710.1063/1.1458597 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.mssp.2022.10727810.1016/j.mssp.2022.107278 ↗
20. 10.1149/2.093403jes10.1149/2.093403jes ↗
21. 10.1149/2.0351709jss10.1149/2.0351709jss ↗
22. 10.1149/2.0011908jss10.1149/2.0011908jss ↗
23. 10.1016/j.mssp.2021.10640210.1016/j.mssp.2021.106402 ↗
24. 10.1149/2162-8777/accd9910.1149/2162-8777/accd99 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.12451610.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124516 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.mee.2019.11109010.1016/j.mee.2019.111090 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0254-0584(98)80001-110.1016/S0254-0584(98)80001-1 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.12718910.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.127189 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.12519910.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125199 ↗
30. 10.1016/0927-7757(94)02954-q10.1016/0927-7757(94)02954-q ↗
31. 10.1016/S0031-8914(37)80203-710.1016/S0031-8914(37)80203-7 ↗
32. 10.1109/tsm.2002.80487210.1109/tsm.2002.804872 ↗
33. 10.1179/02670840110151801510.1179/026708401101518015 ↗
34. 10.1149/2.036209jes10.1149/2.036209jes ↗
35. 10.1021/ja409476410.1021/ja4094764 ↗
36. 10.1002/1096-9918(200008)29:8<548::AID-SIA902>3.0.CO;2-Q10.1002/1096-9918(200008)29:8<548::AID-SIA902>3.0.CO;2-Q ↗
37. 10.1016/s0254-0584(02)00390-510.1016/s0254-0584(02)00390-5 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.corsci.2004.09.01410.1016/j.corsci.2004.09.014 ↗
39. 10.1039/DF954180007410.1039/DF9541800074 ↗