journal article·2019-05-28

Enhanced Gate Reliability in GaN MIS-FETs by Converting the GaN Channel into Crystalline Gallium Oxynitride

Mengyuan Hua, Xiangbin Cai, Song Yang, Zhaofu Zhang, Zheyang Zheng, Ning Wang, Kevin J. Chen

Publisher page

Abstract

We demonstrated the enhanced threshold voltage (VTH) stability and gate reliability of the enhancement-mode (E-mode) GaN-based MIS-FETs under reverse-bias stress (i.e., stress at off-state with high drain voltage), which is achieved by converting the conventional GaN (Eg ∼ 3.4 eV) channel into a crystalline GaOxN1–x (Eg ∼ 4.1 eV) layer. In the MIS-FETs stressed at off-state with a large drain voltage, holes will be generated in the high-electric-field region by impact ionization, and subsequently, degradation of the gate dielectric is caused by the holes passing through the dielectric film. As the valence band offset between the GaOxN1–x and GaN is ∼0.6 eV, an energy barrier for holes will be formed surrounding the gate, which can prevent holes from flowing to the gate side and therefore reduce the hole-induced gate dielectric degradation. The crystalline gallium oxynitride layer converted from GaN could also be a promising method to improve channel reliability for many GaN-based structures and processes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Ga2O3 and related materials · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China · Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TED.2017.265757910.1109/TED.2017.2657579 ↗
2. 10.1109/TED.2013.226857710.1109/TED.2013.2268577 ↗
3. 10.1109/LED.2008.200060710.1109/LED.2008.2000607 ↗
4. 10.1109/WiPDA.2013.669557010.1109/WiPDA.2013.6695570 ↗
5. 10.1109/TED.2007.90860110.1109/TED.2007.908601 ↗
6. 10.1109/LED.2013.227984410.1109/LED.2013.2279844 ↗
7. 10.1109/LED.2014.232237910.1109/LED.2014.2322379 ↗
8. 10.1109/IEDM.2014.704706910.1109/IEDM.2014.7047069 ↗
9. 10.1002/pssa.20100063110.1002/pssa.201000631 ↗
10. 10.1109/LED.2013.227984610.1109/LED.2013.2279846 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.microrel.2017.12.03910.1016/j.microrel.2017.12.039 ↗
12. 10.1088/0268-1242/31/9/09300410.1088/0268-1242/31/9/093004 ↗
13. 10.1109/TED.2015.246971610.1109/TED.2015.2469716 ↗
14. 10.1109/IEDM.2016.783838810.1109/IEDM.2016.7838388 ↗
15. 10.1109/LED.2017.270747310.1109/LED.2017.2707473 ↗
16. 10.1109/IRPS.2017.793630910.1109/IRPS.2017.7936309 ↗
17. 10.1109/TDMR.2008.92374310.1109/TDMR.2008.923743 ↗
18. 10.1109/TED.2018.285699810.1109/TED.2018.2856998 ↗
19. 10.1109/IEDM.2017.826848910.1109/IEDM.2017.8268489 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.507876710.1063/1.5078767 ↗
21. 10.1109/LED.2013.228609010.1109/LED.2013.2286090 ↗
22. 10.1109/LED.2016.251968010.1109/LED.2016.2519680 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.500393010.1063/1.5003930 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.6b1537010.1021/acsami.6b15370 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.44.162010.1103/PhysRevLett.44.1620 ↗
26. Schroder D. K. · 2006
27. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.08.00610.1016/j.ultramic.2017.08.006 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2009.04.00510.1016/j.ultramic.2009.04.005 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.microrel.2012.06.00710.1016/j.microrel.2012.06.007 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.822610.1103/PhysRevB.38.8226 ↗
31. 10.1109/LED.2016.253069310.1109/LED.2016.2530693 ↗