journal article·2023-06-27

Piezoelectric Metamaterial Blood Pressure Sensor

Abdollah Ahmadpour, Ali K. Yetisen, Savas Tasoglu

Publisher page

Abstract

Continuous blood pressure monitoring allows for detecting the early onset of cardiovascular disease and assessing personal health status. Conventional piezoelectric blood pressure monitoring techniques have the ability to sense biosignals due to their good dynamic responses but have significant drawbacks in terms of power consumption, which limits the operation of blood pressure sensors. Although piezoelectric materials can be used to enhance the self-powered blood pressure sensor responses, the structure of the piezoelectric element can be modified to achieve a higher output voltage. Here, a structural study on piezoelectric metamaterials in blood pressure sensors is demonstrated, and output voltages are computed and compared to other architectures. Next, a Bayesian optimization framework is defined to get the optimal design according to the metamaterial design space. Machine learning algorithms were used for applying regression models to a simulated dataset, and a 2D map was visualized for key parameters. Finally, a time-dependent blood pressure was applied to the inner surface of an artery vessel inside a 3D tissue skin model to compare the output voltage for different metamaterials. Results revealed that all types of metamaterials can generate a higher electric potential in comparison to normal square-shaped piezoelectric elements. Bayesian optimization showed that honeycomb metamaterials had the optimal performance in generating output voltage, which was validated according to regression model analysis resulting from machine learning algorithms. The simulation of time-dependent blood pressure in a 3D skin tissue model revealed that the design suggested by the Bayesian optimization process can generate an electric potential more than two times greater than that of a conventional square-shaped piezoelectric element.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Tactile and Sensory Interactions · Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkiye

Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK

Koç University Arçelik Research Center for Creative Industries (KUAR), Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkiye

Koc University Is Bank Artificial Intelligence Lab (KUIS AILab), Koç University, Sariyer, Istanbul 34450, Turkiye

Boğaziçi Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Boğaziçi University, Çengelköy, Istanbul 34684, Turkiye

Koç University Translational Medicine Research Center (KUTTAM), Koç University, Istanbul 34450, Turkey

Funding

Ko? ?niversitesi Translasyonel Tip Arastirma Merkezi · H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions · Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung · T?rkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu · Royal Academy Newton-Katip ?elebi Transforming Systems · Outstanding Young Scientists Awards · Bilim Kahramanlari Dernegi The Young Scientist Award · Science Academy?s Young Scientist Awards Program

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3389/fcvm.2021.75477810.3389/fcvm.2021.754778 ↗
2. Organization, W.H · 2014
3. 10.1002/adma.20211029110.1002/adma.202110291 ↗
4. 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820a55f510.1161/CIR.0b013e31820a55f5 ↗
5. 10.3390/bios1204023410.3390/bios12040234 ↗
6. 10.3390/s2003085110.3390/s20030851 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0031-3955(16)32486-510.1016/S0031-3955(16)32486-5 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20170230810.1002/adma.201702308 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.03710.1016/j.nanoen.2016.02.037 ↗
10. 10.1002/smll.20180301810.1002/smll.201803018 ↗
11. Panwar, L. S.; Kala, S.; Panwar, V.; Panwar, S. S.; Sharma, S. Design of MEMS piezoelectric blood pressure sensor. in 2017 3rd International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication & Automation (ICACCA) (Fall); IEEE 2017.10.1109/ICACCAF.2017.8344698 ↗
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/20/4/04500910.1088/0964-1726/20/4/045009 ↗
13. 10.1002/advs.20170002910.1002/advs.201700029 ↗
14. Dagdeviren C. · Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 110.1038/ncomms5496 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0002-8703(41)90651-810.1016/S0002-8703(41)90651-8 ↗
16. Ramsay M. J. · 2001
17. 10.1016/j.sna.2011.08.01910.1016/j.sna.2011.08.019 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.mattod.2021.04.01910.1016/j.mattod.2021.04.019 ↗
19. 10.1063/5.008201510.1063/5.0082015 ↗
20. Farhangdoust S. · 2020
21. 10.3390/s2205190910.3390/s22051909 ↗
22. 10.1021/nn503268f10.1021/nn503268f ↗
23. 10.1088/2399-7532/ab0c4110.1088/2399-7532/ab0c41 ↗
24. Cholleti E. R. · 2018
25. 10.1088/1361-6463/ac27d210.1088/1361-6463/ac27d2 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467-020-17947-210.1038/s41467-020-17947-2 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20190484510.1002/adma.201904845 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jmat.2017.08.00210.1016/j.jmat.2017.08.002 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41580-021-00407-010.1038/s41580-021-00407-0 ↗
30. 10.1002/smll.20210286710.1002/smll.202102867 ↗
31. 10.1177/058310240404327510.1177/0583102404043275 ↗
32. 10.1002/mame.20170022910.1002/mame.201700229 ↗
33. 10.1143/JJAP.8.97510.1143/JJAP.8.975 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsami.7b0409510.1021/acsami.7b04095 ↗
35. 10.5114/pdia.2013.3835910.5114/pdia.2013.38359 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.06.01110.1016/j.medengphy.2007.06.011 ↗
37. 10.1007/BF0040641510.1007/BF00406415 ↗
38. 10.1034/j.1600-0846.2000.006004214.x10.1034/j.1600-0846.2000.006004214.x ↗
39. 10.1034/j.1600-0846.2003.00019.x10.1034/j.1600-0846.2003.00019.x ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ultras.2011.09.00610.1016/j.ultras.2011.09.006 ↗
41. Boonya-Ananta T. · Sci. Rep. · 2021 · 11 · 110.1038/s41598-021-82124-4 ↗
42. 10.1155/2015/38163410.1155/2015/381634 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.eujim.2017.08.00710.1016/j.eujim.2017.08.007 ↗
44. 10.1161/01.RES.8.3.62210.1161/01.RES.8.3.622 ↗
45. Van De Vosse, F.; Van Dongen, M. Cardiovascular fluid mechanics─lecture notes. Faculty of Applied Physics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering; Eindhoven University of Technology: Eindhoven, Netherlands, 1998. 41.
46. High Blood Pressure Symptoms and Causes. 2021 18/05/2021; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/bloodpressure/about.htm.
47. Acharya, M. S.; Armaan, A.; Antony, A. S. A comparison of regression models for prediction of graduate admissions. in 2019 international conference on computational intelligence in data science (ICCIDS); IEEE, 2019.10.1109/ICCIDS.2019.8862140 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.54510.1016/j.proeng.2012.09.545 ↗
49. Awad M. · 2015 · 6710.1007/978-1-4302-5990-9_4 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.rse.2005.05.00810.1016/j.rse.2005.05.008 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.01.00110.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.01.001 ↗
52. Frazier, P. I. A tutorial on Bayesian optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.02811, 2018.
53. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/9/09504410.1088/0964-1726/23/9/095044 ↗
54. 10.3390/s14010120810.3390/s140101208 ↗