journal article·2021-09-28

One-Step Fabrication of Low-Resistance Conductors on 3D-Printed Structures by Laser-Induced Graphene

Mehraneh Tavakkoli Gilavan, Md Saifur Rahman, Aamir Minhas-Khan, Suresh Nambi, Gerd Grau

Publisher page

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is becoming increasingly prevalent in the manufacturing of goods for different applications. Many of these applications will benefit from the integration of electronics into 3D-printed structures. In this study, we report a fabrication method to convert 3D-printed polyetherimide (PEI) into graphene by exposing it to a scanned laser beam. This laser-induced graphene (LIG) is not only conductive but also has a large gauge factor for mechanical strain sensing. We have achieved a sheet resistance of 0.30 Ω/sq which is 50 times lower than that of previous reports on 3D-printed PEI/PC sheets and the lowest LIG sheet resistance value reported to date on any polymer substrate. This is achieved due to three main factors: large thickness of LIG on a 3D-printed object, maximization of the laser energy per unit area, and improved LIG morphology on 3D-printed PEI compared with that on commercial PEI.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Lassonde School of Engineering, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada

Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, 14 Engineering Drive, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, United States

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Mitacs

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
2. 10.1007/s00170-012-4558-510.1007/s00170-012-4558-5 ↗
3. 10.1080/17452759.2017.132672410.1080/17452759.2017.1326724 ↗
4. 10.1007/s12541-015-0134-x10.1007/s12541-015-0134-x ↗
5. Perez, K. B.; Williams, C. B. Combining Additive Manufacturing and Direct Write for Integrated Electronics-A Review. 24th International SFF Symposium-An Additive Manufacturing Conference SFF 2013, 2013; pp 962–979.
6. 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.07.00110.1016/j.apmt.2017.07.001 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.04.00310.1016/j.apmt.2017.04.003 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.sna.2017.07.02010.1016/j.sna.2017.07.020 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.01110.1016/j.matdes.2017.06.011 ↗
10. Ovid’ko I. A. · Rev. Adv. Mater. Sci. · 2013 · 34 · 1
11. 10.1016/j.mtphys.2017.07.00110.1016/j.mtphys.2017.07.001 ↗
12. 10.1557/mrs.2012.20310.1557/mrs.2012.203 ↗
13. 10.3390/ma1008088110.3390/ma10080881 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2016.03.01410.1016/j.synthmet.2016.03.014 ↗
15. 10.1002/smll.20100200910.1002/smll.201002009 ↗
16. 10.1038/ncomms671410.1038/ncomms6714 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0853910.1021/acsnano.7b08539 ↗
18. 10.1021/am509065d10.1021/am509065d ↗
19. 10.1002/aelm.20160018510.1002/aelm.201600185 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20170221110.1002/adma.201702211 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20180362110.1002/adma.201803621 ↗
22. 10.1080/10667857.2018.144726510.1080/10667857.2018.1447265 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20170049610.1002/adma.201700496 ↗
24. 10.3390/nano901009010.3390/nano9010090 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.05.03710.1016/j.carbon.2021.05.037 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.07.04810.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.07.048 ↗
27. 10.3844/ajeassp.2009.120.12610.3844/ajeassp.2009.120.126 ↗
28. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa661510.1088/1361-6528/aa6615 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsanm.9b0193710.1021/acsanm.9b01937 ↗
30. 10.1021/am509087u10.1021/am509087u ↗