journal article·2026-03-01

Behavior and Strength of Cast-In-Place over Precast, Prestressed Panel Slabs with High-Strength Reinforcing Bars

Authors not provided

ACI Structural Journal· Volume 123· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Seismic Performance and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO, 2007, “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” fourth edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.
2. AASHTO, 2010, “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” fifth edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.
3. AASHTO, 2017, “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” seventh edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.
4. AASHTO, 2020, “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” ninth edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.
5. ACI Committee 224, 2002, “Control of Cracking in Concrete Structures (ACI 224R-01),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 46 pp.
6. ACI Committee 318, 2014, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 520 pp.
7. ACI Committee 318, 2019, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) (Reapproved 2022),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 624 pp.
8. ASTM A370-21, 2021, “Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel Products,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
9. ASTM C39/C39M-21, 2021, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
10. ASTM C469/C469M-22, 2022, “Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
11. ASTM C496/C496M-17, 2017, “Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
12. Folliard, K.; Smith, C.; Sellers, G.; Brown, M.; and Breen, J. E., 2003, “Evaluation of Alternative Materials to Control Drying-Shrinkage Cracking in Concrete Bridge Decks,” Report No. FHWA/TX-04/0-4098-4, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX.
13. Frosch, R. J., 1999, “Another Look at Cracking and Crack Control in Reinforced Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 96, No. 3, May-June, pp. 437-442.10.14359/679 ↗
14. Frosch, R. J., 2001, “Flexural Crack Control in Reinforced Concrete,” Design and Construction Practices to Mitigate Cracking, SP-204, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, pp. 135-154.
15. Garza, D., 2023, “The Use of High-Strength Reinforcement in Bridge Decks,” MSc thesis, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
16. Gergely, P., and Lutz, L. A., 1968, “Maximum Crack Width in RC Flexural Members,” Causes, Mechanism and Control of Cracking in Concrete, SP-20, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, pp. 87-117.
17. Harries, K. A.; Shahrooz, B. M.; and Soltani, A., 2012, “Flexural Crack Widths in Concrete Girders with High-Strength Reinforcement,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 17, No. 5, pp. 804-812. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000030610.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000306 ↗
18. Hieber, D. G.; Wacker, J. M.; Eberhard, M. O.; and Stanton, J. F., 2005, “State-of-the-Art Report on Precast Concrete Systems for Rapid Construction of Bridges,” Report No. WA-RD 594.1, Washington State Transportation Center, Olympia, WA.
19. Kareem, R. S.; Jones, C.; Dang, C. N.; Prinz, G. S.; and Hale, W. M., 2020, “Structural Performance of Concrete Bridge Decks Reinforced with Grade-830 Steel Bars,” Structures, V. 27, pp. 1396-1404. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.07.05410.1016/j.istruc.2020.07.054 ↗
20. Merrill, B. D., 2002, “Texas’ Use of Precast Concrete Stay-in-Place Forms for Bridge Decks,” 2002 Concrete Bridge Conference, Nashville, TN.
21. Ren, W.; Sneed, L. H.; Yang, Y.; and He, R., 2015, “Numerical Simulation of Prestressed Precast Concrete Bridge Deck Panels Using Damage Plasticity Model,” International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, V. 9, No. 1, pp. 45-54. doi: 10.1007/s40069-014-0091-210.1007/s40069-014-0091-2 ↗
22. Salomon, A. L., and Moen, C. D., 2014, “Structural Design Guidelines for Concrete Bridge Decks Reinforced with Corrosion-Resistant Reinforcing Bars,” No. FHWA/VCTIR 15-R10, Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, VA.
23. Sim, C., and Frosch, R. J., 2020, “Cracking Behavior of Slabs with Corrosion-Resistant and High-Strength Reinforcing Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 117, No. 5, Sept., pp. 245-257. doi: 10.14359/5172468410.14359/51724684 ↗
24. TxDOT, 2022, “Bridge Detailing Guide,” Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX.
25. TxDOT, 2024, “Bridge Design Manual – LRFD,” Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX.
26. You, Y. M.; Sneed, L. H.; and Belarbi, A., 2012, “Numerical Simulation of Partial-Depth Precast Concrete Bridge Deck Spalling,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 17, No. 3, pp. 528-536. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000025410.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000254 ↗