journal article·2023-05-01

Experimental Investigation on Precast Bridge Deck Panel System

Authors not provided

ACI Structural Journal· Volume 120· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The American Concrete Institute (ACI) is a leading authority and resource worldwide for the development and distribution of consensus-based standards, technical resources, educational programs, certification programs, and proven expertise for individuals and organizations involved in concrete design, construction, and materials, who share a commitment to pursuing the best use of concrete.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO, 1998, “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.
2. AASHTO, 2012, “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.
3. Badie, S. S., and Tadros, M. K., 2008, “Full-Depth Precast Concrete Bridge Deck Panel Systems,” NCHRP Report 584, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 115 pp.
4. Badie, S. S.; Baishya, M. C.; and Tadros, M. K., 1998, “NUDECK—An Efficient and Economical Precast Prestressed Bridge Deck System,” PCI Journal, V. 43, No. 5, Sept.-Oct., pp. 56-74. doi: 10.15554/pcij.09011998.56.7410.15554/pcij.09011998.56.74 ↗
5. Fagundo, F. E.; Tabatabai, H.; Soongswang, K.; Richardson, J. M.; and Callis, E. G., 1985, “Precast Panel Composite Bridge Decks,” Concrete International, V. 7, No. 5, May, pp. 59-65.
6. Hieber, D. G.; Wacker, J. M.; Eberhard, M. O.; and Stanton, J. F., 2005, “State-of-the-Art Report on Precast Concrete Systems for Rapid Construction of Bridges,” Report No. WA-RD 594.1, Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 112 pp.
7. Klingner, R. E., and Bieschke, L. A., 1988, “Effects of Transverse Panel Strand Extensions on the Behavior of Precast Prestressed Panel Bridges,” PCI Journal, V. 33, No. 1, Jan.-Feb., pp. 68-88. doi: 10.15554/pcij.01011988.68.8810.15554/pcij.01011988.68.88 ↗
8. Kovach, J. D., and Naito, C., 2008, “Horizontal Shear Capacity of Composite Concrete Beams without Interface Ties,” Advanced Technology for Large Structural Systems (ATLSS) Report No. 08-05, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 236 pp.
9. Ley, T.; Ghashgesh, M.; and Patil, S., 2010, “Investigations of a Precast Bridge Deck System,” Report No. OTCREOS7.1-31-F, Oklahoma Transportation Center, Oklahoma State University, Midwest City, OK, 76 pp.
10. Liu, Z., 2018, “Evaluation of an Innovative Joint Design for the Adjacent Box Beam Bridges,” PhD dissertation, Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 161 pp.
11. Liu, Z., and Phares, B. M., 2020, “Material Selection for the Joint between Adjacent Box Beams,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 32, No. 4, Apr., p. 04020039. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000308510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003085 ↗
12. Liu, Z.; Freeseman, K. S.; Phares, B. M.; and Mousavi, S., 2020, “Evaluation, Laboratory Testing, Construction Documentation, and Field Testing/Monitoring of the US 52 Overflow Bridge over the Mississippi River,” Report No. InTrans Project 16-569, Institute for Transportation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 76 pp.
13. Mander, T. J.; Henley, M. D.; Scott, R. M.; Head, M. H.; Mander, J. B.; and Trejo, D., 2010, “Experimental Performance of Full-Depth Precast, Prestressed Concrete Overhang, Bridge Deck Panels,” Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, V. 15, No. 5, Sept., pp. 503-510. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000009810.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000098 ↗
14. PCI Committee on Bridges, 1987, “Special Report: Precast Prestressed Concrete Bridge Deck Panels,” PCI Journal, V. 32, No. 2, Mar.-Apr., pp. 26-45.
15. Phares, B.; Greimann, L.; Liu, Z.; and Freeseman, K., 2017, “Context Sensitive Designs: Testing of Multi-Performance Level Box Beam Standards,” Report No. IHRB Project TR-681, Institute for Transportation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 99 pp.
16. Scholz, D. P.; Wallenfelsz, J. A.; Lijeron, C.; and Roberts-Wollmann, C. L., 2007, “Recommendations for the Connection between Full-Depth Precast Bridge Deck Panel Systems and Precast I-Beams,” Report No. FHWA/VTRC 07-CR17, Virgnia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, VA, 80 pp.
17. Spraggs, K. R.; Sneed, L. H.; Belarbi, A.; and Anderson, N. L., 2012, “Field Investigation of Spalling in Partial-Depth Precast Concrete Bridge Decks Using Nondestructive Testing,” PCI Journal, V. 57, No. 2, pp. 80-93. doi: 10.15554/pcij.03012012.80.9310.15554/pcij.03012012.80.93 ↗
18. Trejo, D.; Head, M.; Mander, J.; Mander, T.; Henley, M.; Scott, R.; Ley, T.; and Patil, S., 2011, “Development of a Precast Bridge Deck Overhang System,” Report No. FHWA/TX-10/0-6100-1, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX, 228 pp.
19. Trejo, D.; Hite, M.; Mander, J.; Mander, T.; Henley, M.; Scott, R.; Ley, T.; and Patil, S., 2008, “Development of a Precast Bridge Deck Overhang System for the Rock Creek Bridge,” Report No. FHWA/TX-08/0-6100-2, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX, 132 pp.
20. Tsui, C. K.; Burns, N. H.; and Klingner, R. E., 1986, “Behavior of Ontario-Type Bridge Deck on Steel Girders: Negative Moment Region and Load Capacity,” Center for Transportation Research, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 122 pp.
21. WSDOT, 1998, “Washington State Bridge Design Manual,” Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, WA.
22. Yamane, T.; Tadros, M. K.; Badie, S. S.; and Baishya, M. C., 1998, “Full Depth Precast, Prestressed Concrete Bridge Deck System,” PCI Journal, V. 43, No. 3, May-June, pp. 50-66. doi: 10.15554/pcij.05011998.50.6610.15554/pcij.05011998.50.66 ↗