Experiments on Partially Coupled Concrete Wall System with Perforated Steel Beam
Source abstract
Abstract
© 2022, American Concrete Institute.A series of cyclic loading tests was carried out for five half-scale hybrid steel coupling beams to evaluate the seismic performance of a partially coupled wall system with different design parameters. This system comprises the structural concrete wall, embedded steel beam, steel coupling beam with bolted connection, and top-seat angles. The two primary test parameters were the web opening size of the coupling beam that determines its shear-to-moment capacity ratio, and the presence of the top-seat angles. Test results showed that the shear-to-moment capacity ratio of the coupling beam greatly influences their deformation and energy dissipation capacities, as well as the degree of concrete wall damage. Top-seat angles were also found to increase the lateral stiffness and energy dissipation of the coupled shear wall system. Creation of the web opening leads to enhanced seismic performance of the beam as a replaceable structural fuse. Based on the test results, a design procedure of the hybrid steel coupling beam system with bolted connections is proposed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI Innovation Task Group 1, “Acceptance Criteria for Moment Frames Based on Structural Testing (ACI T1.1-01),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2001, 10 pp.
2. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 623 pp.
3. AISC, “Steel Construction Manual,” 14th edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL, 2011, 2192 pp.
4. ANSI/AISC 341-16, “Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings,” American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL, 2016, 430 pp.
5. ANSI/AISC 360-16, “Specification for Structural Steel Buildings,” American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL, 2016, 620 pp.
6. ASCE, “Recommendations for Seismic Design of Hybrid Coupled Wall Systems,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2010, 70 pp.
7. ASCE/SEI 7-16, “Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2016.
8. ASTM C39/C39M-18, “Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018.
9. ASTM E8/E8M-16a, “Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016.
10. Barbachyn, S. M.; Kurama, Y. C.; and Novak, L. C., 2012, “Analytical Evaluation of Diagonally Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams under Lateral Loads,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 109, No. 4, July-Aug., pp. 497-508.10.14359/51683869 ↗
11. Canbolat, B. A.; Parra-Montesinos, G. J.; and Wight, J. K., 2005, “Experimental Study on Seismic Behavior of High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Cement Composite Coupling Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 102, No. 1, Jan.-Feb., pp. 159-166.10.14359/13541 ↗
12. Chaallal, O.; Gauthier, D.; and Malenfant, P., 1996, “Classification Methodology for Coupled Shear Walls,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 122, No. 12, pp. 1453-1458. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:12(1453)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:12(1453) ↗
13. Clarke, J. L., and Symons, R. M., “Tests on Embedded Steel Billets for Precast Concrete Beam-Column Connections,” Technical Report No. 42.523, Cement and Concrete Association, London, UK, 1978, 12 pp.
14. CSA A23.3:2019, “Design of Concrete Structures,” Canadian Standards Association, Mississauga, ON, Canada, 2019.
15. Darwin, D., and Lucas, W. K., 1990, “LRFD for Steel and Composite Beams with Web Openings,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 116, No. 6, pp. 1579-1593. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:6(1579)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:6(1579) ↗
16. Farsi, A.; Keshavarzi, F.; Pouladi, P.; and Mirghaderi, R., 2016, “Experimental Study of a Replaceable Steel Coupling Beam with an End-plate Connection,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, V. 122, pp. 138-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.03.01810.1016/j.jcsr.2016.03.018 ↗
17. fib, “Seismic Design of Precast Concrete Building Structures,” Fédération Internationale du Béton, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2003, 262 pp.
18. Fortney, P. J.; Shahrooz, B. M.; and Rassati, G. A., 2007, “Large-Scale Testing of a Replaceable ‘Fuse’ Steel Coupling Beam,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 133, No. 12, pp. 1801-1807. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:12(1801)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:12(1801) ↗
19. Galano, L., and Vignoli, A., 2000, “Seismic Behavior of Short Coupling Beams with Different Reinforcement Layouts,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 97, No. 6, Nov.-Dec., pp. 876-885.10.14359/9633 ↗
20. Gong, B., and Shahrooz, B. M., 2001, “Steel-Concrete Composite Coupling Beams-Behavior and Design,” Engineering Structures, V. 23, No. 11, pp. 1480-1490. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00042-610.1016/S0141-0296(01)00042-6 ↗
21. Harries, K. A.; Fortney, P. J.; Shahrooz, B. M.; and Brienen, P. J., 2005, “Practical Design of Diagonally Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams—Critical Review of ACI 318 Requirements,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 102, No. 6, Nov.-Dec., pp. 876-882.10.14359/14796 ↗
22. Harries, K. A.; Gong, G.; and Shahrooz, B. M., 2000, “Behavior and Design of Reinforced Concrete, Steel, and Steel-Concrete Coupling Beams,” Earthquake Spectra, V. 16, No. 4, pp. 775-799. doi: 10.1193/1.158613910.1193/1.1586139 ↗
23. Harries, K. A.; Mitchell, D.; Cook, W. D.; and Redwood, R. G., 1993, “Seismic Response of Steel Beams Coupling Concrete Walls,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 119, No. 12, pp. 3611-3629. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:12(3611)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:12(3611) ↗
24. Ji, X.; Liu, D.; Sun, Y.; and Molina Hutt, C., 2017a, “Seismic Performance Assessment of a Hybrid Coupled Wall System with Replaceable Steel Coupling Beams versus Traditional RC Coupling Beams,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, V. 46, No. 4, pp. 517-535. doi: 10.1002/eqe.280110.1002/eqe.2801 ↗
25. Ji, X.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Q.; and Okazaki, T., 2017b, “Cyclic Behavior of Replaceable Steel Coupling Beams,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 143, No. 2, p. 04016169. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000166110.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001661 ↗
26. Kang, T. H.-K., and Wallace, J. W., 2008, “Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Slab-Column Connections with Thin Plate Stirrups,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 105, No. 5, Sept.-Oct., pp. 617-625.10.14359/19945 ↗
27. Lam, W. Y.; Su, R. K.-L.; and Pam, H.-J., 2005, “Experimental Study on Embedded Steel Plate Composite Coupling Beams,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 131, No. 8, pp. 1294-1302. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:8(1294)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:8(1294) ↗
28. Lim, W. Y.; Kang, T. H.-K.; and Hong, S. G., 2016, “Cyclic Testing of Bolted Steel Coupling Beams in Fast-Track Precast Concrete Construction,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 113, No. 6, Nov.-Dec., pp. 1289-1300. doi: 10.14359/5168925010.14359/51689250 ↗
29. Lim, W. Y.; Kang, T. H.-K.; and Hong, S. G., 2018, “Effect of Reinforcement Details on Seismic Behavior of Precast Concrete Wall-Steel Coupling Beam Systems,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 115, No. 6, Nov., pp. 1751-1763. doi: 10.14359/5170241410.14359/51702414 ↗
30. Marcakis, A. H., and Mitchell, D., 1980, “Precast Concrete Connections with Embedded Steel Member,” PCI Journal, V. 25, No. 4, pp. 88-116. doi: 10.15554/pcij.07011980.88.11610.15554/pcij.07011980.88.116 ↗
31. Mattock, A. H., and Gaffar, G. H., 1982, “Strength of Embedded Steel Sections as Brackets,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 79, No. 2, Feb., pp. 83-93.10.14359/10883 ↗
32. Naish, D.; Fry, A.; Klemencic, R.; and Wallace, J., 2013, “Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams—Part I: Testing,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 110, No. 6, Nov.-Dec., pp. 1057-1066.10.14359/51686160 ↗
33. Park, W. S., and Yun, H. D., 2005, “Seismic Behaviour of Coupling Beams in a Hybrid Coupled Shear Walls,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, V. 61, No. 11, pp. 1492-1524. doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.04.00610.1016/j.jcsr.2005.04.006 ↗
34. Paulay, T., and Binney, J. R., 1974, “Diagonally Reinforced Coupling Beams of Shear Walls,” Shear in Reinforced Concrete, SP-42, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, pp. 579-598.
35. Paulay, T., and Priestley, M. J. N., 1992, Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Structures, John Wiley & Sons, NY.10.1002/9780470172841 ↗
36. Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, 1999, PCI Design Handbook: Precast and Prestressed Concrete, 5th Edition, Chicago, IL.
37. Shahrooz, B. M.; Remmetter, M. E.; and Qin, F., 1993, “Seismic Design and Performance of Composite Coupled Walls,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 119, No. 11, pp. 3291-3309. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:11(3291)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:11(3291) ↗
38. Tassios, T. P.; Moretti, M.; and Bezas, A., 1996, “On the Behavior and Ductility of Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams of Shear Walls,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 96, No. 6, Nov.-Dec., pp. 711-720.