Study on structure homogeneity of plate sample with large dimension during equal channel angular pressing (ECAP)
Source abstract
Abstract
A self-made die with large cross section (180.2 × 22.2 mm) for equal channel angular pressing (ECAP) was used to study the influence of two different pressing routes (Cxand CY) on refining homogeneity of high-purity aluminum plates. Microstructures were investigated by optical microscopy (OM) and electron back scatter diffraction (EBSD) methods, and micro-hardness and tensile tests were taken to evaluate deformation degree across the cross section and mechanical properties, respectively. The results indicate that pressing routes of ECAP have a great influence on structure homogeneity of plate samples. The route CYleads to fine grains with better homogeneity because the same deformation direction is taken through each pass. Coarse columnar crystals with 3–4 mm change to 68.6 μm nearly equiaxed grains and a strong cube texture forms after four CYpasses, and corresponding mechanical properties increase by a factor compared to as-cast plate.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1557/JMR.2005.012010.1557/JMR.2005.0120 ↗
2. Experimental and numerical investigation on pure aluminum by ECAP10.1016/S1003-6326(08)60442-2 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.02.04210.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.02.042 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)01129-010.1016/S0921-5093(98)01129-0 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.06.01210.1016/j.msea.2008.06.012 ↗
6. 10.1557/JMR.2002.002610.1557/JMR.2002.0026 ↗
7. 10.1007/978-94-011-4062-1_910.1007/978-94-011-4062-1_9 ↗
8. 10.1557/jmr.2014.20710.1557/jmr.2014.207 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.09.01310.1016/j.actamat.2013.09.013 ↗
10. 10.1557/JMR.2009.006010.1557/JMR.2009.0060 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.04.00910.1016/j.actamat.2004.04.009 ↗
12. 10.1557/JMR.2001.008410.1557/JMR.2001.0084 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.02.47310.1016/j.msea.2006.02.473 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.02310.1016/j.msea.2005.08.023 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.03.08310.1016/j.msea.2005.03.083 ↗
16. 10.1557/JMR.2008.020410.1557/JMR.2008.0204 ↗
17. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00019-710.1016/S1359-6454(00)00019-7 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11661-004-0311-510.1007/s11661-004-0311-5 ↗
19. 10.1557/jmr.2010.2810.1557/jmr.2010.28 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.01.07410.1016/j.msea.2011.01.074 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.02.06510.1016/j.msea.2010.02.065 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.01810.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.018 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matchar.2010.09.00910.1016/j.matchar.2010.09.009 ↗
24. 10.1557/jmr.2015.3810.1557/jmr.2015.38 ↗
25. 10.1016/0921-5093(95)09705-810.1016/0921-5093(95)09705-8 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00522-710.1016/S0921-5093(03)00522-7 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.05.09110.1016/j.msea.2005.05.091 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matchar.2009.03.01010.1016/j.matchar.2009.03.010 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.08.02910.1016/j.msea.2006.08.029 ↗
30. Influence of annealing on ductility of ultrafine-grained titanium processed by equal-channel angular pressing–Conform and drawing
31. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.08.12110.1016/j.msea.2006.08.121 ↗
32. 10.1007/BF0258612010.1007/BF02586120 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.06.03210.1016/j.msea.2009.06.032 ↗
34. 10.1557/JMR.2005.000510.1557/JMR.2005.0005 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.10.01310.1016/j.msea.2007.10.013 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matchar.2013.01.01010.1016/j.matchar.2013.01.010 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01339-910.1016/S0921-5093(01)01339-9 ↗