journal article·1996-07

Ion beam amorphization of muscovite mica

C. Templier, F. Desage, J. C. Desoyer, G. Hishmeh, L. Cartz, S. E. Donnelly, V. Vishnyakov, R. C. Birtcher

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 11· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

The microstructure of a muscovite mica exposed to a rare gas ion beam has been studied by transmission electron microscopy. The investigation of damage without implantation was carried out using argon and helium ions of sufficient energy to traverse the 100–150 nm mica specimens. For 340 keV Ar++ irradiation, amorphization of mica occurred at a fluence as low as 3.5 × 1014 ions · cm−2, which corresponds to 0.29 dpa. Muscovite can be amorphized using 80 keV helium ions, but this requires a much higher fluence and damage production of 4.6 × 10−6 ions · cm−2 and 0.60 dpa, respectively. Since helium irradiation results principally in ionization energy loss, it indicates that amorphization of muscovite results mainly from nuclear interactions. Complete amorphization of muscovite mica is found to take place for all ions at approximately the same amount of nuclear energy transfer to energetic primary knock-on atoms, assuming a recoil energy greater than 500 eV. This suggests that amorphization occurs directly in dense displacement cascades. A significant amount of helium, 100 ppm, can be implanted into muscovite mica without destroying the crystal structure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Ion-surface interactions and analysis · High-pressure geophysics and materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0168-583X(92)95060-510.1016/0168-583X(92)95060-5 ↗
2. 10.1080/0033757750824204710.1080/00337577508242047 ↗
3. 10.1016/0022-3115(89)90238-910.1016/0022-3115(89)90238-9 ↗
4. 10.1016/0149-1970(94)00016-Y10.1016/0149-1970(94)00016-Y ↗
5. 10.1007/978-1-4899-3680-6_1010.1007/978-1-4899-3680-6_10 ↗
6. 10.1016/0168-583X(92)95059-Z10.1016/0168-583X(92)95059-Z ↗
7. 10.1016/0022-3115(88)90143-210.1016/0022-3115(88)90143-2 ↗
8. 10.1080/0141861910822534410.1080/01418619108225344 ↗
9. Wang · 1992 · 333
10. 10.1557/JMR.1994.309510.1557/JMR.1994.3095 ↗
11. 10.1016/0029-554X(80)90440-110.1016/0029-554X(80)90440-1 ↗
12. 3. Xu Q. , M. S. Thesis, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI (1992).
13. 10.1016/0168-583X(94)96208-110.1016/0168-583X(94)96208-1 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.158210.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1582 ↗
15. 10.1016/0168-583X(94)96200-610.1016/0168-583X(94)96200-6 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.158910.1103/PhysRevLett.59.1589 ↗
17. Birtcher · 1993 · 129
18. Cartz · Inst. Phys. Conf. Series · 1990 · 111 · 507
19. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb03789.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb03789.x ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.929110.1103/PhysRevB.43.9291 ↗
21. 10.1557/JMR.1991.190510.1557/JMR.1991.1905 ↗
22. 10.1557/JMR.1994.068810.1557/JMR.1994.0688 ↗
23. 10.1557/JMR.1992.308010.1557/JMR.1992.3080 ↗
24. 17. Jaouen C. , Physic Thesis, Poitiers, France.
25. Perez · 1987 · 156
26. 10.1016/0304-3991(93)90159-U10.1016/0304-3991(93)90159-U ↗
27. 10.1016/0022-3115(93)90119-J10.1016/0022-3115(93)90119-J ↗