Helium ion microscopy of electrospun CNT–polymer composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Arrangement and conformational interactions of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and matrix upon electrospinning have been examined by surface-sensitive helium ion microscopy (He-IM). The enhanced surficial information is mostly a consequence of convoluted topographic sensitivity and reduced electrostatic charging, resulting from He ion–matter interactions. In addition, we have explored the correlation of findings by He-IM imaging with secondary electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and near edge x-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectroscopy; the latter encouraged by similar sampling depth profiles in both techniques. This study provides further evidence of strong conformational relations between filler and matrix (which we have reported recently) and of the presence of a tightly bound polymeric phase interaction between the CNT and the bulk matrix. We conclude that both the absence of electrostatic charging and enhanced surface sensitivity in He-IM offer a remarkable opportunity to study electrospinning dynamics in nanocomposites.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ma200262z10.1021/ma200262z ↗
2. 10.1039/c000041h10.1039/c000041h ↗
3. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/21/21570210.1088/0957-4484/20/21/215702 ↗
4. 40. Beigbeder A. , Linares M. , Devalckenaere M. , Degée P. , Claes M. , Beljonne D. , Lazzaroni R. , and Dubois P. : CH-π interactions as the driving force for silicone-based nanocomposites with exceptional properties. Adv. Mater. 20, 1003 (2008).10.1002/adma.200701497 ↗
5. 10.1038/nmat139110.1038/nmat1391 ↗
6. 10.1557/jmr.2013.3010.1557/jmr.2013.30 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0379-6779(00)00597-X10.1016/S0379-6779(00)00597-X ↗
8. 10.1002/marc.20080054910.1002/marc.200800549 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat140810.1038/nmat1408 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.284.5418.134010.1126/science.284.5418.1340 ↗
11. 10.1038/srep0351410.1038/srep03514 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.12291110.1063/1.122911 ↗
13. 10.1007/978-1-4614-8660-210.1007/978-1-4614-8660-2 ↗
14. 10.1021/la404312x10.1021/la404312x ↗
15. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/45/45530110.1088/0957-4484/20/45/455301 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20130332310.1002/adma.201303323 ↗
17. 10.1002/polc.507034010510.1002/polc.5070340105 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2009.01.01310.1016/j.ultramic.2009.01.013 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.01.01210.1016/j.carbon.2007.01.012 ↗
20. 10.1093/jmicro/dfm02410.1093/jmicro/dfm024 ↗
21. 10.1021/nl051860m10.1021/nl051860m ↗
22. 10.1021/bm900955p10.1021/bm900955p ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.06.05010.1016/j.ultramic.2005.06.050 ↗
24. 10.1021/ma202604d10.1021/ma202604d ↗
25. 10.1016/j.cplett.2005.01.07210.1016/j.cplett.2005.01.072 ↗
26. 10.1021/ma802529h10.1021/ma802529h ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mser.2005.04.00210.1016/j.mser.2005.04.002 ↗
28. Bar-Cohen · 2000 · 11 · 1
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.347210.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3472 ↗
30. 10.1038/354056a010.1038/354056a0 ↗
31. 10.1088/0957-4484/15/12/01510.1088/0957-4484/15/12/015 ↗
32. Stöhr · 2003
33. 10.1021/la803951y10.1021/la803951y ↗
34. 10.1016/j.polymer.2003.10.01110.1016/j.polymer.2003.10.011 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.07.04010.1016/j.carbon.2014.07.040 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.09.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.09.003 ↗
37. 10.1021/cm047866e10.1021/cm047866e ↗
38. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.00810.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.008 ↗
39. The helium ion microscope: The next stage in nanoscale imaging
40. 10.1080/1745808060067001510.1080/17458080600670015 ↗
41. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2010.03467.x10.1111/j.1365-2818.2010.03467.x ↗
42. Brandrup · 1989