Effect of microstructure on damage tolerance in grinding dental glass-ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigated the modes of grinding-induced subsurface damage in dental glass-ceramics and the influence of microstructure on strength degradation. A series of micaceous glass-ceramics crystallized from the same glass composition were tested. The diameter of the mica platelets in these glass-ceramics was varied via heat treatment. Grinding was performed using three diamond wheels (with diamond particle size of 40, 100, and 180 µm, respectively) at depth of cut ranging from 5 µm to 100 µm. A bonded- interface technique was employed to examine the machining- induced subsurface damage. Relatively large median and lateral cracks were found in the glass-ceramic with the smallest mica platelets. In contrast, no cracks were found in the material containing large mica platelets. The ground specimens were fractured in four-point flexure to measure strength as a function of grinding conditions and mica platelet sizes. The strength of the ground specimens was reduced to approximately 30% of the strength of the polished specimens for the glass- ceramic containing the smallest mica platelets; that of the glass-ceramic with the intermediate mica platelet size was reduced to 60%. In contrast, virtually no strength loss occurred with the glass-ceramic containing large mica platelets. Microstructure was shown to determine the mode and degree of strength-controlling damage in the machining of these dental glass-ceramics. Polishing after grinding removes subsurface damage and recovers strength for the glass-ceramics containing fine mica crystals.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Adair · Int. J. Periodont. Rest. Dent. · 1984 · 2 · 32
2. Kelly · 1991 · 253
3. 10.1557/JMR.1996.021510.1557/JMR.1996.0215 ↗
4. 10.1002/9780470314616.ch4010.1002/9780470314616.ch40 ↗
5. 10.1557/JMR.1996.029610.1557/JMR.1996.0296 ↗
6. 10.1146/annurev.ms.22.080192.00051510.1146/annurev.ms.22.080192.000515 ↗
7. 10.1016/0022-3093(91)90092-K10.1016/0022-3093(91)90092-K ↗
8. Rosenstiel · 1995
9. 3. Grossman D. G. and Johnson J. L. M. , U.S. Patent No. 4,652,312 (1987).
10. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb05424.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb05424.x ↗
11. Fischer-Cripps · Acta Metall. · 1996 · 44 · 519
12. 2. Beall G. H. , U.S. Patent No. 4,608,348 (1986).
13. Chyung · 1972 · 116710.1525/9780520323230-074 ↗
14. Sturdevant · 1995
15. 10.14219/jada.archive.1991.020510.14219/jada.archive.1991.0205 ↗
16. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08683.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08683.x ↗
17. Grossman · 1991 · 103
18. Luthy · 1991 · 613
19. 10.1017/CBO978051162312710.1017/CBO9780511623127 ↗
20. 10.1177/0022034598077004120110.1177/00220345980770041201 ↗