Theoretical and Experimental Study on Minimum Shear Reinforced Ratio in Concrete Beams
Source abstract
Abstract
First Name is required invalid characters Last Name is required invalid characters Email Address is required Invalid Email Address Please select a country... Afghanistan Åland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua And Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Antarctic Territory British Indian Ocean Territory British Overseas Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea (the Republic of) Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Kosovo, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestine, State of Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Réunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Kitts And Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Samoa San Marino Sao Tome And Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka St Vincent And Grenadines St. Helena Ascensian and Tristan da Aunh Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad And Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks And Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands (British) Virgin Islands (U.S.) Wallis And Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Country/Territory is required
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete and Cement Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Xie, Y.; Ahmad, S. H.; Yu, T.; Hino, S.; and Chung, W., “Shear Ductility of Reinforced Concrete Beams of Normal and High-Strength Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 91, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1994, pp. 140-149.10.14359/4592 ↗
2. Ozcebe, G.; Ersoy, U.; and Tankut, T., “Evaluation of Minimum Shear Reinforcement Requirements for Higher Strength Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 96, No. 3, May-June 1999, pp. 361-369.10.14359/669 ↗
3. Krauthammer, T., “Minimum Shear Reinforcement Based on Interface Shear Transfer,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 89, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1992, pp. 99-105.10.14359/1271 ↗
4. Johnson, M. K., and Ramirez, J. A., “Minimum Shear Reinforcement in Beams with Higher Strength Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 86, No. 4, July-Aug. 1989, pp. 376-382.10.14359/2896 ↗
5. Yoon, Y.-S.; Cook, W. D.; and Mitchell, D., “Minimum Shear Reinforcement in Normal, Medium, and High-Strength Concrete Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 93, No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 1996, pp. 576-584.10.14359/9716 ↗
6. Shehata, I. A. E. M.; Shehata, L. C. D.; and Garcia, S. L. G., “Minimum Steel Ratios in Reinforced Concrete Beams Made of Concrete with Different Strengths—Theoretical Approach,” Materials and Structures, V. 36, No. 1, 2003, pp. 3-11.10.1007/BF02481565 ↗
7. Rahal, K. N., and Al-Shaleh, K. S., “Minimum Transverse Reinforcement in 65 MPa Concrete Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 101, No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2004, pp. 872-878.10.14359/13463 ↗
8. Angelakos, D.; Bentz, E. C.; and Collins, M. P., “Effect of Concrete Strength and Minimum Stirrups on Shear Strength of Large Members,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 98, No. 3, May-June 2001, pp. 290-300.10.14359/10220 ↗
9. Lee, J.-Y., and Kim, U.-Y., “Effect of Longitudinal Tensile Reinforcement Ratio and Shear Span-Depth Ratio on Minimum Shear Reinforcement in Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 105, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2008, pp. 134-144.10.14359/19728 ↗
10. Aguilar, G.; Villamizar, S.; and Ramirez, J. A., “Evaluation of Shear Reinforcement Design Limits in High-Strength Concrete Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 115, No. 2, Mar. 2018, pp. 401-414. doi: 10.14359/5170113210.14359/51701132 ↗
11. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318-89) and Commentary (ACI 318R-89),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1989, 353 pp.
12. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 520 pp.
13. AASHTO, “AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” seventh edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2014.
14. Jayasinghe, T.; Gunawardena, T.; and Mendis, P., “A Comparative Study on Minimum Shear Reinforcement Provisions in Codes of Practice for Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, V. 15, 2021, Article No. e00617. doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0061710.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00617 ↗
15. AS 3600:2018, “Concrete Structures,” Standards Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2018.
16. Ali, A.; Thomas, J.; and Parappattu, N. B., “Geopolymer As Repair Material—A Review,” International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering, V. 3, No. 9, 2016, pp. 2349-2763.
17. Ambily, P. S.; Madheswaran, C. K.; Sharmila, S.; and Muthiah, S., “Experimental and Analytical Investigations on Shear Behaviour of Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Beams,” International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, V. 2, No. 2, 2011, pp. 673-688.
18. Darmawan, M. S.; Bayuaji, R.; Sugihardjo, H.; Husin, N. A.; and Anugraha Affandhie, R. B., “Shear Strength of Geopolymer Concrete Beams Using High Calcium Content Fly Ash in a Marine Environment,” Buildings, V. 9, No. 4, 2019, Article No. 98. doi: 10.3390/buildings904009810.3390/buildings9040098 ↗
19. Yacob, N. S.; ElGawady, M. A.; Sneed, L. H.; and Said, A., “Shear Strength of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Engineering Structures, V. 196, 2019, Article No. 109298. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.10929810.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109298 ↗
20. Mourougane, R.; Puttappa, C. G.; Sashidhar, C.; and Muthu, K. U., “Shear Behaviour of High Strength GPC/TVC Beams,” Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Architecture and Civil Engineering (AARCV 2012), V. 1, R. Prabhakara, J. Chandra, C. R. Jetty, and A. H. Bhashyam, eds., Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 2012, pp. 142-145.
21. Ambily, P. S.; Madheswaran, C. K.; Lakhsmanan, N.; Dattatreya, J. K.; and Jaffer Sathik, S. A., “Experimental Studies on Shear Behaviour of Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Thin Webbed T-Beams with and without Fibres,” International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, V. 3, No. 1, 2012, pp. 128-140.
22. Ng, T. S.; Amin, A.; and Foster, S. J., “The Behaviour of Steel-Fibre-Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Beams in Shear,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 65, No. 5, 2013, pp. 308-318. doi: 10.1680/macr.12.0008110.1680/macr.12.00081 ↗
23. Madheswaran, C. K.; Ambily, P. S.; Lakshmanan, N.; Dattatreya, J. K.; and Jaffer Sathik, S. A., “Shear Behavior of Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete Thin-Webbed T-Beams,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 111, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 2014, pp. 89-98.10.14359/51686449 ↗
24. Maranan, G. B.; Manalo, A. C.; Karunasena, W. M.; Benmokrane, B.; and Mendis, P. A., “Comparison of the Shear Behaviour of Geopolymer Concrete Beams with GFRP and Steel Transverse Reinforcements,” Proceedings, The 12th International Symposium on Fiber Reinforced Polymers for Reinforced Concrete Structures (FRPRCS-12) & The 5th Asia-Pacific Conference on Fiber Reinforced Polymers in Structures (APFIS-2015), Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 2015, 6 pp.
25. Yacob, N. S., “Shear Behavior of Reinforced Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete,” master’s thesis, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, 2016.
26. Visintin, P.; Mohamed Ali, M. S.; Albitar, M.; and Lucas, W., “Shear Behaviour of Geopolymer Concrete Beams without Stirrups,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 148, 2017, pp. 10-21. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.01010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.010 ↗
27. Maranan, G. B.; Manalo, A. C.; Benmokrane, B.; Karunasena, W.; Mendis, P.; and Nguyen, T. Q., “Shear Behaviour of Geopolymer-Concrete Beams Transversely Reinforced with Continuous Rectangular GFRP Composite Spirals,” Composite Structures, V. 187, 2018, pp. 454-465. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.08010.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.080 ↗
28. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) (Reapproved 2022),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 624 pp.
29. fib, “fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010,” International Federation for Structural Concrete, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2010.
30. ABNT NBR 6118:2014, “Projeto de Estruturas de Concreto—Procedimentos,” Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 2014, 255 pp.
31. ABNT NBR 5733/1991, “Cimento Portland de Alta Resistência Inicial,” Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 1991, 5 pp.
32. ABNT NBR 5739:2018, “Concreto — Ensaio de Compressão de Corpos de Prova Cilíndricos,” Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 2018, 9 pp.
33. ABNT NBR 7222/1994, “Concreto e Argamassa - Determinação da Resistência à Tração por Compressão Diametral de Corpos de Prova Cilíndricos,” Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 1994, 6 pp.
34. Simplício, M. A. S., “Comportamento de Vigas de Concreto de Alto Desempenho com Pequenos Percentuais de Armadura Transversal,” master’s dissertation, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil, 1999.
35. Cladera, A., and Marí, A. R., “Experimental Study on High-Strength Concrete Beams Failing in Shear,” Engineering Structures, V. 27, No. 10, 2005, pp. 1519-1527. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.04.01010.1016/j.engstruct.2005.04.010 ↗