Failure Mode-Dependent Behavior of Carbon Fiber- Reinforced Polymer Prestressed Concrete Girders
Source abstract
Abstract
First Name is required invalid characters Last Name is required invalid characters Email Address is required Invalid Email Address Please select a country... Afghanistan Åland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua And Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Antarctic Territory British Indian Ocean Territory British Overseas Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea (the Republic of) Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Kosovo, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestine, State of Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Réunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Kitts And Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Samoa San Marino Sao Tome And Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka St Vincent And Grenadines St. Helena Ascensian and Tristan da Aunh Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad And Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks And Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands (British) Virgin Islands (U.S.) Wallis And Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Country/Territory is required
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. FHWA, “National Bridge Inventory (NBI),” Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, 2022, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/nbi/ascii.cfm. (last accessed Aug. 16, 2023)
2. Fiorillo, G., and Ghosn, M., “Risk-Based Life-Cycle Analysis of Highway Bridge Networks under Budget Constraints,” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, V. 18, No. 10-11, 2022, pp. 1457-1471. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2022.205952510.1080/15732479.2022.2059525 ↗
3. Bamonte, P.; Kalaba, N.; and Felicetti, R., “Computational Study on Prestressed Concrete Members Exposed to Natural Fires,” Fire Safety Journal, V. 97, 2018, pp. 54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2018.02.00610.1016/j.firesaf.2018.02.006 ↗
4. Kotsovinos, P.; Judge, R.; Walker, G.; and Woodburn, P., “Fire Performance of Structural Cables: Current Understanding, Knowledge Gaps, and Proposed Research Agenda,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 146, No. 8, 2020, p. 03120002. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000270310.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002703 ↗
5. Naito, C.; Sause, R.; Hodgson, I.; Pessiki, S.; and Desai, C., “Forensic Evaluation of Prestressed Box Beams from the Lake View Drive over I-70 Bridge,” Report No. FHWA-PA-2006-017-EMG002, Center for Advanced Technology for Large Structural Systems, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 2006.
6. ACI Committee 440, “Prestressing Concrete Structures with FRP Tendons (ACI 440.4R-04) (Reapproved 2011),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2004, 35 pp.
7. Campbell, I., “Prestressing Concrete Structures with Fibre-Reinforced Polymers (Design Manual No. 5),” Structural Innovation and Monitoring Technologies Resource Centre (SIMTReC), Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 2008.
8. Frankhauser, W.; Elkaissi, J.; Khal, S.; McMilan, S.; Potter, W.; Rister, D.; Wilson, D.; and O’Connor, J., “Advances in Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Composites in Transportation Infrastructure,” NCHRP 20-68A, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2013.
9. Rizkalla, S., “Innovative Use of FRP for Sustainable Precast Concrete Bridges and Structures,” Proceedings of the Transport Research Arena, Paris, France, 2014.
10. Ozyildirim, H. C., and Sharp, S. R., “Concrete Beams Prestressed Using Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer,” Report No. VTRC 19-R29, Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, VA, 2019.
11. Peng, F., and Xue, W., “Analytical Approach for Flexural Capacity of FRP Prestressed Concrete T-Beams with Non-Prestressed Steel Bars,” Journal of Composites for Construction, ASCE, V. 22, No. 6, 2018, p. 04018063. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.000090310.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000903 ↗
12. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) (Reapproved 2022),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2019, 624 pp.
13. CDOT, “Bridge Design Manual,” Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, CO, 2012.
14. PCI, PCI Bridge Design Manual, third edition, Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, IL, 2014.
15. Duffy, V. G., Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics and Risk Management, Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland, 2021.10.1007/978-3-030-77817-0 ↗
16. Engel, U.; Quan-Haase, A.; Liu, S. X.; and Lyberg, L., Handbook of Computational Social Science, Routledge, Oxfordshire, UK, 2021.10.4324/9781003024583 ↗
17. Railsback, S. F., and Grimm, V., Agent-Based and Individual-Based Modeling: A Practical Introduction, second edition, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2019.10.2307/jj.28274141 ↗
18. DeAngelis, D. L., and Diaz, S. G., “Decision-Making in Agent-Based Modeling: A Current Review and Future Prospectus,” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, V. 6, 2019, p. 237. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2018.0023710.3389/fevo.2018.00237 ↗
19. Gilbert, N., Agent-Based Models, second edition, SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 2020.
20. Wilensky, U., and Rand, W., An Introduction to Agent-Based Modeling: Modeling Natural, Social, and Engineered Complex Systems with NetLogo, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2015.
21. Abdelrahman, A. A., and Rizkalla, S. H., “Serviceability of Concrete Beams Prestressed by Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced-Plastic Bars,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 94, No. 4, July-Aug. 1997, pp. 447-457.10.14359/496 ↗
22. Saeed, Y. M., “Behavior of Prestressed Concrete Beams with CFRP Strands,” MS thesis, Portland State University, Portland, OR, 2016.
23. Dolan, C. W., and Swanson, D., “Development of Flexural Capacity of a FRP Prestressed Beam with Vertically Distributed Tendons,” Composites Part B: Engineering, V. 33, No. 1, 2002, pp. 1-6. doi: 10.1016/S1359-8368(01)00053-110.1016/S1359-8368(01)00053-1 ↗
24. Mertol, H. C.; Rizkalla, S.; Scott, P.; Lees, J. M.; and El-Hacha, R., “Durability of Concrete Beams Prestressed with CFRP Bars,” Case Histories and Use of FRP for Prestressing Applications, SP-245, R. El-Hacha and S. H. Rizkalla, eds., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2007, pp. 1-20.
25. Nowak, A. S., “Calibration of LRFD Bridge Design Code,” NCHRP Report 368, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, 1993.
26. Ghosn, M.; Moses, F.; and Wang, J., “Design of Highway Bridges for Extreme Events,” NCHRP Report 489, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, 2003.
27. AASHTO, “LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” ninth edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2020.
28. Marsh, M. L., and Stringer, S. J., “Performance-Based Seismic Bridge Design (NCHRP Synthesis 440),” Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2013.10.17226/22632 ↗
29. Karayannis, C. G.; Kosmidou, P.-M. K.; and Chalioris, C. E., “Reinforced Concrete Beams with Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Bars—Experimental Study,” Fibers, V. 6, No. 4, 2018, p. 99. doi: 10.3390/fib604009910.3390/fib6040099 ↗
30. Kim, Y. J., and Nickle, R. W., “Long-Term Multipliers and Deformability of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Prestressed Concrete,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 115, No. 1, Jan. 2018, pp. 223-234. doi: 10.14359/5170098810.14359/51700988 ↗
31. Barker, R. M., and Puckett, J. A., Design of Highway Bridges: An LRFD Approach, fourth edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2021.10.1002/9781119646341 ↗
32. Nowak, A. S., and El-Hor, H. H., “Serviceability Criteria for Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girders,” 4th International Bridge Engineering Conference, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, 1995, pp. 181-187.
33. AASHTO, The Manual for Bridge Evaluation, third edition, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC, 2018.
34. Atkins, P.; de Paula, J.; and Keeler, J., Physical Chemistry: Molecular Thermodynamics and Kinetics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2019.
35. McMurry, J. E., Organic Chemistry, eighth edition, Cengage Learning, Boston, MA, 2012.