DataVXJournal of Materials ResearchPaper
journal article·2025-12-14

Multi-objective optimization of lightweight, energy absorption, and heat transfer in gradient porous metals via deep learning and genetic algorithm

Lei Wang, Minghai Tang, Donghui Yang, Huayuan Tang

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 40· Issue 23
Publisher page
Source abstract

Abstract

Gradient porous metals, widely used in aerospace and automotive industries, must meet multiple performance requirements such as lightweight, energy absorption, and heat transfer, making design and analysis challenging. Combining fully connected neural network (FCNN) and genetic algorithm (GA), this study proposes the FCNN-GA framework for the multi-objective design of gradient porous metals. The method starts with parametric modeling, where the structure is defined by three key parameters: center pore radius, radius gradient, and pore wall thickness. This is followed by dataset generation through finite element simulations. Then, an FCNN model captures the nonlinear relationship between these parameters and performance. Finally, by integrating a GA, the FCNN-GA framework enables dual- and triple-objective optimization. Results show that the FCNN model achieves a goodness of fit greater than 0.97, providing a reliable surrogate for finite element analysis. The framework successfully balances conflicting performance requirements, offering significant potential for aerospace and energy applications.Graphical Abstract
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Topology Optimization in Engineering · Nanoporous metals and alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Zhu, J. Sun, H. Tang et al., Gradient-structural optimization of metal fiber porous materials for sound absorption. Powder Technol. 301, 1235–1241 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.08.00610.1016/j.powtec.2016.08.006 ↗
2. F. Yang, X. Shen, P. Bai et al., Optimization and validation of sound absorption performance of 10-layer gradient compressed porous metal. Metals 9(5), 588 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/met905058810.3390/met9050588 ↗
3. G. Hyun, S. Cao, Y. Ham et al., Three-dimensional, submicron porous electrode with a density gradient to enhance charge carrier transport. ACS Nano 16(6), 9762–9771 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c0348010.1021/acsnano.2c03480 ↗
4. C. Chang, B. Li, B. Fu et al., Simulation and experimental investigation of phase change materials within porous metal structures with gradient porosity. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 234, 126136 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2024.12613610.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2024.126136 ↗
5. X. Liu, Y. Wang, X. He et al., Deformation failure mechanism and constitutive model of gradient aluminum foam under impact loading. Compos. Struct. 327, 117684 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11768410.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117684 ↗
6. M. Tang, L. Wang, J. Song, An advanced deep learning approach for energy absorption prediction in porous metals across diverse strain rate scenarios. Comp. Mater. Sci. 253, 113862 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2025.11386210.1016/j.commatsci.2025.113862 ↗
7. S. Guo, R. Zhao, H. Yang et al., Improved energy absorption and mechanical properties of porous Ti-6Al-4V alloys with gradients disordered cell fabricated via laser powder bed fusion. Eng. Struct. 326, 119582 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11958210.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119582 ↗
8. S.J. Yue, Z.G. Xu, Numerical simulation on pore-scale pool boiling mechanisms of horizontal gradient porous metals. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 142, 106640 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.10664010.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.106640 ↗
9. M. Li, Y. Bai, M. Su et al., Compressive properties and energy absorption of ordered porous aluminum with strengthening structures. Int. J. Mater. Res. 116(1), 10–21 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijmr-2021-834410.1515/ijmr-2021-8344 ↗
10. S. Guo, R. Zhao, Z. Huang et al., Optimizing porous Ti-6Al-4V alloys: gradients disordered cell enhance mechanical properties and energy absorption. J. Manuf. Process. 137, 342–362 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.02.00810.1016/j.jmapro.2025.02.008 ↗
11. Z. Zhang, G. Yan, M. Sun et al., Pore-scale simulation of forced convection heat transfer in metal foams with uniform and gradient structures. Appl. Therm. Eng. 225, 120074 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.12007410.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120074 ↗
12. J. Chen, G. Liu, X. Han et al., Engineering high-performance Li metal batteries through dual-gradient porous Cu-CuZn host. ACS Nano 18(21), 13662–13674 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c0072010.1021/acsnano.4c00720 ↗
13. J. Zhang, W. Chen, S. Ren et al., Sound absorbing properties and optimization design of gradient porous metal fibers in high-temperature environments. J. Xi’an Jiaotong Univ. 52(1), 143–150 (2018). https://doi.org/10.7652/xjtuxb20180102110.7652/xjtuxb201801021 ↗
14. S. Zhang, Y. Zhao, Y. Qian et al., Stable Li deposition of 3D highstrength-lithiophilicity-porous CuZn current collector with gradient structure. J. Alloys Compd. 951, 169953 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.16995310.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169953 ↗
15. Y. Lv, J. Guo, Q. Zhang et al., Design of low elastic modulus and high strength TC4 porous scaffolds via new variable gradient strategies. Mater. Lett. 325, 132616 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2022.13261610.1016/j.matlet.2022.132616 ↗
16. B. Yu, B. Han, P.B. Su et al., Graded square honeycomb as sandwich core for enhanced mechanical performance. Mater. Des. 89, 642–652 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.15410.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.154 ↗
17. Y. Shi, H. Duan, E. Chang et al., Mechanical performance analysis of functionally graded triply periodic minimal surfaces. AIP Adv. 14(8), 085229 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.020526310.1063/5.0205263 ↗
18. H. Zhao, Y. Han, C. Pan et al., Design and mechanical properties verification of gradient Voronoi scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Micromachines 12(6), 664 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi1206066410.3390/mi12060664 ↗
19. Y. Liu, T. Liu, R. Ding et al., Experimental and numerical investigation of transpiration cooling with gradient porosity layout for the thermal protection of nose cone. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 149, 109140 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2024.10914010.1016/j.ast.2024.109140 ↗
20. J. Liu, M. Xu, R. Zhang et al., Progress of porous/lattice structures applied in thermal management technology of aerospace applications. Aerospace 9(12), 827 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace912082710.3390/aerospace9120827 ↗
21. K. Kitazono, R. Tada, Y. Sugiyama et al., Impact energy absorbing system for space lander using hemispherical open-cell porous aluminum, Materials Science Forum. Trans Tech Publications Ltd 933, 337–341 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.933.33710.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.933.337 ↗
22. L. Xia, P. Breitkopf, Recent advances on topology optimization of multiscale nonlinear structures. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 24, 227–249 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-016-9170-710.1007/s11831-016-9170-7 ↗
23. S. Hyun, S. Torquato, Optimal and manufacturable two-dimensional, Kagome-like cellular solids. J. Mater. Res. 17(1), 137–144 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2002.002110.1557/JMR.2002.0021 ↗
24. M. Gralow, F. Weigand, D. Herzog et al., Biomimetic design and laser additive manufacturing—A perfect symbiosis? J. Laser Appl. 32(2), 21201 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2351/1.513164210.2351/1.5131642 ↗
25. S. Zhang, P. Jiang, J. Qi et al., Biomimetic dual-phase ceramic lattice architectures with enhanced mechanical and vibration isolation performances. Mater. Today Commun. 39, 108742 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.10874210.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108742 ↗
26. A. Debnath, L. Raman, W. Li et al., Comparing forward and inverse design paradigms: a case study on refractory high-entropy alloys. J. Mater. Res. 38(17), 4107–4117 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-023-01122-610.1557/s43578-023-01122-6 ↗
27. K. Hiraide, Y. Oya, M. Suzuki et al., Inverse design of polymer alloys using deep learning based on self-consistent field analysis and finite element analysis. Mater. Today Commun. 37, 107233 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10723310.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107233 ↗
28. Q. Xu, Z. Duan, H. Yan et al., Deep learning-driven topology optimization for heat dissipation of integrated electrical components using dual temperature gradient learning and MMC method. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 20(2), 291–316 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-023-09676-310.1007/s10999-023-09676-3 ↗
29. J. Wan, J.W. Jiang, H.S. Park, Machine learning-based design of porous graphene with low thermal conductivity. Carbon 157, 262–269 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.10.03710.1016/j.carbon.2019.10.037 ↗
30. L. Raju, K. Lee, Z. Liu et al., Second harmonic generation enhanced with inversely designed plasmonics for nonlinear metamaterials, Nonlinear Freq. Gener. Convers. Mater. Dev. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1117/12260764410.1117/122607644 ↗
31. B. Kim, S. Lee, J. Kim, Inverse design of porous materials using artificial neural networks. Sci. Adv. 6(1), eaax9324 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax932410.1126/sciadv.aax9324 ↗
32. S. Katoch, S.S. Chauhan, V. Kumar, A review on genetic algorithm: past, present, and future. Multimed. Tools Appl. 80, 8091–8126 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-10139-610.1007/s11042-020-10139-6 ↗
33. Q. Zeng, S. Duan, Z. Zhao et al., Inverse Design of Energy-Absorbing Metamaterials by Topology Optimization. Adv. Sci. 10(4), 2204977 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.20220497710.1002/advs.202204977 ↗
34. D. Wang, D. Tan, L. Liu, Particle swarm optimization algorithm: an overview. Soft. Comput. 22(2), 387–408 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-016-2474-610.1007/s00500-016-2474-6 ↗
35. Y. Wang, Q. Zeng, J. Wang et al., Inverse design of shell-based mechanical metamaterial with customized loading curves based on machine learning and genetic algorithm. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 401, 115571 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2022.11557110.1016/j.cma.2022.115571 ↗
36. Z. Ma, P. Feng, Y. Li, Inverse design of semiconductor laser parameters based on deep learning and particle swarm optimization method. Proc. SPIE 11209, 695–701 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.254870110.1117/12.2548701 ↗
37. X. Dai, D. Feng, H. Ma. Capacitive Coupler Dimensions Optimization Using Deep Learning-Based Genetic Algorithm.2024 IEEE 33rd International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE). IEEE. 1–6 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIE54533.2024.1059582510.1109/ISIE54533.2024.10595825 ↗
38. Y. Li, S. Yang, Z. Ren, A multi-objective topology optimization methodology using deep learning and its application to electromagnetic devices. IEEE Trans. Magn. 60(3), 1–5 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2023.332049010.1109/TMAG.2023.3320490 ↗
39. M. Tang, L. Wang, Z. Xin et al., High energy absorption design of porous metals using deep learning. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 282, 109593 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.10959310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2024.109593 ↗
40. P. Natário, N. Silvestre, D. Camotim, Web crippling failure using quasi-static FE models. Thin-Walled Struct. 84, 34–49 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2014.05.00310.1016/j.tws.2014.05.003 ↗
41. M. Wang, H. Wang, Y. Yin et al., Temperature field prediction for various porous media considering variable boundary conditions using deep learning method. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer 132, 105916 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.10591610.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.105916 ↗
42. J. Zou, Y. Han, S.S. So, Overview of artificial neural networks, Artif. Neural Netw. 458, 14–22 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-101-1_210.1007/978-1-60327-101-1_2 ↗
43. Z. Luo, L. Wang, M. Lu, A stepwise physics-informed neural network for solving large deformation problems of hypoelastic materials. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 124(20), 4453–4472 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.732310.1002/nme.7323 ↗
44. E. Haghighat, M. Raissi, A. Moure et al., A physics-informed deep learning framework for inversion and surrogate modeling in solid mechanics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 379, 113741 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.11374110.1016/j.cma.2021.113741 ↗
45. K. Deb, H. Jain, An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, part I: solving problems with box constraints. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18(4), 577–601 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2013.228153510.1109/TEVC.2013.2281535 ↗
46. I. Das, J.E. Dennis, Normal-boundary intersection: a new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems. SIAM J. Optim. 8(3), 631–657 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1137/S105262349630751010.1137/S1052623496307510 ↗