journal article·2019-07

Size-dependent vibration analysis of carbon nanotubes

Wu-Rong Jian, Xiaohu Yao, Yugang Sun, Zhuocheng Xie, Xiaoqing Zhang

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 34· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

Considering the nonlocal small-scale effect and surface effect, we perform the size-dependent vibration analysis of carbon nanotube (CNT). The modified governing equations for CNT’s vibration behaviors are derived by using the nonlocal Euler–Bernoulli and Timoshenko beam models, together with the consideration of surface tension and surface elasticity. According to the numerical experiments, both small-scale effect and surface effect make a substantial difference. For flexural vibration, size effect for CNT’s vibration behaviors weakens with the increase of its diameter, but strengthens with the increase of the length–diameter ratio; for shear vibration with constant length–diameter ratio, a nonlinear correlation between size effect and CNT’s diameter exists, suggesting that there is a typical diameter for CNTs, which corresponds to the “strongest” size effect. In addition, the effects of elastic substrate modulus, temperature change, and axial preloading on the vibration behaviors and their size-dependence are analyzed, respectively.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Mechanical and Optical Resonators · Nonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/0957-4484/8/3/00110.1088/0957-4484/8/3/001 ↗
2. 10.1038/nature0182310.1038/nature01823 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jmgm.2008.03.00510.1016/j.jmgm.2008.03.005 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.176493310.1063/1.1764933 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.10.02210.1016/j.commatsci.2011.10.022 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 68 · 338
7. 10.1209/0295-5075/99/5600710.1209/0295-5075/99/56007 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1369-7021(08)70239-610.1016/S1369-7021(08)70239-6 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.07.04010.1016/j.commatsci.2011.07.040 ↗
10. 10.1038/381678a010.1038/381678a0 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.physleta.2007.10.03310.1016/j.physleta.2007.10.033 ↗
12. Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 19 · 4198
13. 10.1166/jctn.2015.403310.1166/jctn.2015.4033 ↗
14. 10.1088/0957-4484/21/4/04570810.1088/0957-4484/21/4/045708 ↗
15. J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 54 · 4703
16. 10.1063/1.132498410.1063/1.1324984 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.48120810.1063/1.481208 ↗
18. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2002 · 14 · 783
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.556610.1103/PhysRevB.39.5566 ↗
20. J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 108 · 250
21. 10.1016/j.physleta.2005.03.06410.1016/j.physleta.2005.03.064 ↗
22. 10.1088/0022-3727/41/22/22540410.1088/0022-3727/41/22/225404 ↗
23. Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2011 · 50 · 742
24. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 105 · 56
25. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00058-710.1016/S0266-3538(03)00058-7 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.08.04310.1016/j.cnsns.2011.08.043 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.12.03410.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.12.034 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.00510.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.005 ↗
29. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/2/05010.1088/0964-1726/15/2/050 ↗
30. 10.1039/C4CP05495D10.1039/C4CP05495D ↗
31. 10.1088/0965-0393/21/4/04501110.1088/0965-0393/21/4/045011 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.cap.2011.10.00710.1016/j.cap.2011.10.007 ↗
33. 10.1098/rspa.2009.060910.1098/rspa.2009.0609 ↗
34. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101 · 195412
35. 10.1016/S0927-0256(00)00051-310.1016/S0927-0256(00)00051-3 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.03.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2006.03.021 ↗