journal article·2016-07

Monte Carlo simulations of magnetization state of ellipsoidal CoCu particles in disordered self-assembled arrays

V.Z.C. Paes, J. Varalda, P. Schio, J.T. Matsushima, E.C. Pereira, A.J.A. de Oliveira, D.H. Mosca

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 31· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of the magnetization states of disordered self-assembled arrays of particles consisting of Co87Cu13alloy are investigated. The assemblies of magnetic particles with ellipsoidal shapes and volumes ranging from 5 to 50 µm3exhibit densities of about 3 × 106particles per mm2. Magnetization was obtained in the framework of Stoner–Wohlfarth model extended to include phenomenological contributions of second-order magnetic anisotropy and coercivity mechanism with distinct configuration of easy axes of magnetization. MC simulations for assemblies containing no more than 100 particles with negligible magnetic interaction between each other and exhibiting saturation magnetization and magnetic anisotropy constant values close to those found for cobalt in bulk are in good agreement with experimental results. We evaluate and validate our computational modeling using samples having particles with different sizes and different angular distributions of the easy axis of magnetization. A simple numerical approach with minimum of parameters was used to take into account the coercive fields of the samples. Reasonable simulation results are generated based on realistic size distributions and angular distributions of easy axis of magnetization.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Theoretical and Computational Physics · Magnetic Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2000 · 215 · 33
2. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.02440110.1103/PhysRevB.69.024401 ↗
3. 2000
4. 10.1063/1.337781410.1063/1.3377814 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.154110.1103/PhysRevLett.76.1541 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11051-011-0288-010.1007/s11051-011-0288-0 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.1226410.1103/PhysRevB.60.12264 ↗
8. J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 111 · 07B91310.1063/1.3677269 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.565610.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5656 ↗
10. 10.1098/rsta.1948.000710.1098/rsta.1948.0007 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.16710.1103/PhysRevLett.84.167 ↗
12. Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 165210.1038/srep01652 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0304-8853(01)00721-110.1016/S0304-8853(01)00721-1 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.145224710.1063/1.1452247 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.02444110.1103/PhysRevB.78.024441 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.195489210.1063/1.1954892 ↗
17. J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 99 · 08H30110.1063/1.2158387 ↗
18. Adv. Chem. Phys. · 1997 · 98 · 283
19. 10.1039/c1jm11845e10.1039/c1jm11845e ↗
20. 10.1109/TMAG.2007.89379810.1109/TMAG.2007.893798 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.150620410.1063/1.1506204 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.346677110.1063/1.3466771 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0304-8853(02)01334-310.1016/S0304-8853(02)01334-3 ↗
24. 10.1109/TMAG.2002.101776610.1109/TMAG.2002.1017766 ↗
25. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2013 · 25 · 046003
26. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 15 · 1412