journal article·2009-04

Evaluation methods for the hoop strength of small-sized tubular ceramic components

Seong-Gu Hong, Thak-Sang Byun, Lance L. Snead, Chong Soo Lee

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 24· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Miniaturized test methods were developed and applied to measure the hoop strength of small tubular components. A diametrical loading method and an internal pressurization method using elastomeric insert were adopted in the development of testing methods. Detailed analyses to assess these testing methods were attempted by using theoretical solutions and finite element analysis for stress distributions and the characteristics of the Weibull statistics. To demonstrate the applicability of the test methods, commercially available alumina tubes and miniature silicon carbide coatings from surrogate nuclear fuel particles were tested and their fracture strength distributions were analyzed with Weibull statistics. The size scaling relationship on the fracture strength was investigated by correlating with effective surface area. Furthermore, the applicability of the testing methods was discussed in terms of multiaxial stress fields, altered stress distribution by flattened loading contact, and availability of insert, focusing on high-temperature applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Nuclear Materials and Properties · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. A statistical model of brittle fracture by transgranular cleavage
2. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.01.00410.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.01.004 ↗
3. 10.1016/0022-3115(72)90069-410.1016/0022-3115(72)90069-4 ↗
4. 10.1177/00219983910250100110.1177/002199839102501001 ↗
5. Freudentahl · 1968
6. The statistical approach to engineering design in ceramics
7. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.01410.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.014 ↗
8. Beer · 1992
9. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00483.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00483.x ↗
10. 10.1016/0955-2219(92)90021-510.1016/0955-2219(92)90021-5 ↗
11. 1 DOE U.S. Nuclear Energy Research Advisory Committee and the Generation IV International Forum: A Technology Roadmap for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems, 2002.
12. 10.1016/S0022-3115(02)01702-610.1016/S0022-3115(02)01702-6 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0029-5493(03)00033-510.1016/S0029-5493(03)00033-5 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.01367.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.01367.x ↗
15. 10.1016/S0257-8972(97)00290-910.1016/S0257-8972(97)00290-9 ↗
16. Prediction of the strength of ceramic tubular components: Part I-Analysis10.1520/JTE12555J ↗
17. High temperature tube burst test apparatus10.1520/JTE11723J ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.08.02110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.08.021 ↗
19. 10.1007/BF0240266910.1007/BF02402669 ↗
20. 18ASTM Subcommittee C28.07 on Ceramic Matrix Composites: Standard test method for tensile hoop strength of continuous fiber-reinforced advanced ceramic tubular specimens at ambient temperature using elastomeric insert, 2002.
21. 10.1016/S1359-835X(01)00144-010.1016/S1359-835X(01)00144-0 ↗
22. Seely · 1961
23. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.05.03410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.05.034 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.wear.2004.09.06210.1016/j.wear.2004.09.062 ↗
25. 10.1007/BF0054085810.1007/BF00540858 ↗
26. 10.1007/BF0071992410.1007/BF00719924 ↗