Exploring the limits of Fe3+ solid solution in calcium hexaluminate
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Calcium hexaluminate (CA6) forms a broad range of solid solutions by substitution of Al3+ with other cations such as, for example, Fe, Co, Mn, etc. Solid solutions of CA6 with magnetic ions have attracted interest because they allow designing the magnetic behavior depending on the composition of each solid solution. In this paper, we have studied materials pertaining to an area of the CaO–Al2O3–Fe2O3 ternary phase diagram that is potentially interesting, but which has not been too much explored so far. We report on various synthesis methods of calcium hexaluminate with iron in solid solution. The percentages of iron introduced have been varied in order to determine the maximum percentage of iron that can enter into solid solution in the calcium hexaluminate such that the materials obtained exhibit magnetic behavior. Graphical Abstract Exploring the limits of Fe3+ solid solution in calcium hexaluminate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Multiferroics and related materials · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Iron oxide chemistry and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. D. Holtstam, Iron in hibonite: a spectroscopic study. Phys. Chem. Miner. (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0020203110.1007/BF00202031 ↗
2. T. Murata, T. Tanoue, M. Iwasaki, K. Morinaga, T. Hase, Fluorescence properties of Mn4+ in CaAl12O19 compounds as red-emitting phosphor for white LED. J. Lumin. 114(3–4), 207–212 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2005.01.00310.1016/j.jlumin.2005.01.003 ↗
3. G. Costa et al., Ni-doped hibonite (CaAl12O19): a new turquoise blue ceramic pigment. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 29(13), 2671–2678 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.04.00110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.04.001 ↗
4. F. Bondioli, A.M. Ferrari, C. Leonelli, T. Manfredini, Syntheses of Fe2O3/silica red inorganic inclusion pigments for ceramic applications. Mater. Res. Bull. 33(5), 723–729 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-5408(98)00047-610.1016/S0025-5408(98)00047-6 ↗
5. C.S. Prakash, V.M. Nanoti, D.K. Kulkarni, G.M. Rao, Substitutional effect of magnetic behaviour in calcium hexaferrite. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 140–144, 2089–2090 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(94)01409-410.1016/0304-8853(94)01409-4 ↗
6. D.K. Kulkarni, C.S. Prakash, Structural and magnetic properties of CaAl4Fe8O19. Mater. Sci. 17(1), 35–39 (1994)
7. P. Singh, V.K. Babbar, A. Razdan, S.L. Srivastava, R.K. Puri, Complex permeability and permittivity, and microwave absorption studies of Ca(CoTi)xFe12−2xO19 hexaferrite composites in X-band microwave frequencies. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 67(3), 132–138 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5107(99)00328-110.1016/S0921-5107(99)00328-1 ↗
8. F.P. Glasser, F.W.D. Woodhams, R.E. Meads, W.G. Parker, A Mössbauer and ESR study of CaO·6Al2O3CaO·6Fe2O3 solid solutions. J. Solid State Chem. 5(2), 255–261 (1972)10.1016/0022-4596(72)90037-0 ↗
9. C. Domínguez, R. Torrecillas, Influence of Fe3+ on sintering and microstructural evolution of reaction sintered calcium hexaluminate. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 18(9), 1373–1379 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(98)00067-310.1016/S0955-2219(98)00067-3 ↗
10. D.A. Jerebtsov, G.G. Mikhailov, Phase diagram of CaO–Al2O3 system. Ceram. Int. 27(1), 25–28 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-8842(00)00037-710.1016/S0272-8842(00)00037-7 ↗
11. B.A. Duell et al., Structure and electronic properties of CaAl12FeO19 hibonites. J. Solid State Chem. 291, 121650 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2020.12165010.1016/j.jssc.2020.121650 ↗
12. H. Nagumo, K. Watanabe, K. Kakizaki, K. Kamishima, Synthesis and magnetic properties of Fe substituted hibonite. J. Magn. Soc. Jpn. 41(2), 20–24 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3379/msjmag.1701R00110.3379/msjmag.1701R001 ↗
13. Ö. Özdemir, D.J. Dunlop, Hysteresis and coercivity of hematite. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 119(4), 2582–2594 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB01073910.1002/2013JB010739 ↗
14. G. Dehe, B. Seidel, K. Melzer, C. Michalk, Determination of a cation distribution model of the spinel system Fe3−xAlxO4. Phys. Status Solidi A 31(2), 439–447 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.221031021210.1002/pssa.2210310212 ↗
15. M.H. Nguyen, S.-J. Lee, W.M. Kriven, Synthesis of oxide powders by way of a polymeric steric entrapment precursor route. J. Mater. Res. 14(8), 3417–3426 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1999.046210.1557/JMR.1999.0462 ↗
16. L. Lutterotti, Maud: a Rietveld analysis program designed for the internet and experiment integration. Acta Crystallogr. A 56(s1), 54 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1107/S010876730002195410.1107/S0108767300021954 ↗