journal article·2012-11-22

A new approach to determine wedge-indented interfacial toughness in soft-film hard-substrate systems with application to low-k films on Si substrate

Lei Chen, Kaiyang Zeng, Yongwei Zhang, Chongmin She, Guirong Liu

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 27· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

A new approach has been proposed to determine the interfacial toughness of soft-film hard-substrate systems based on wedge indentation experiments. In this approach, a comprehensive finite element study was undertaken to correct de Boer’s solutions, which were used to measure the wedge-indented interfacial toughness. Two-dimensional indentation simulations were first performed to systematically study the effects of the plastic properties of the films and the interfacial toughness itself on the correction factor for de Boer’s equations, which were used as closed-form solutions to evaluate the interfacial toughness. Further, three-dimensional simulations were used to investigate the effects of stress states on the interfacial toughness, which depends on the ratio of the indenter length to the film thickness. A universal correction expression for de Boer’s equations was obtained using a regression method. With this expression, a reverse algorithm was proposed to determine the interfacial toughness, and extensive numerical calculations were performed to verify that the present approach accurately evaluates the interfacial toughness. Finally, this new approach was applied to analyze the wedge indentation of low-kdielectric films, namely, methylsilsesquioxane and black diamond (BDTM) films, on a Si substrate.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Advanced materials and composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1557/jmr.2011.17510.1557/jmr.2011.175 ↗
2. 10.1016/0020-7683(95)00261-810.1016/0020-7683(95)00261-8 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.05110.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.051 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.274947310.1063/1.2749473 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00192-410.1016/S1044-5803(02)00192-4 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0167-9317(03)00341-110.1016/S0167-9317(03)00341-1 ↗
7. 10.1098/rspa.1996.012410.1098/rspa.1996.0124 ↗
8. 10.1016/0956-7151(92)90304-W10.1016/0956-7151(92)90304-W ↗
9. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00295-610.1016/S1359-6454(01)00295-6 ↗
10. 10.1557/JMR.1997.026010.1557/JMR.1997.0260 ↗
11. 10.1016/0022-5096(94)90003-510.1016/0022-5096(94)90003-5 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.33379510.1063/1.333795 ↗
13. 10.1016/1359-6454(95)00430-010.1016/1359-6454(95)00430-0 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.07.01610.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.07.016 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00285-610.1016/S0020-7683(98)00285-6 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.04.00710.1016/j.jmps.2005.04.007 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.02.04610.1016/j.actamat.2004.02.046 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0013-7944(98)00050-210.1016/S0013-7944(98)00050-2 ↗
19. Hutchinson · 1992 · 29 · 63
20. 10.1080/1478643090297385810.1080/14786430902973858 ↗
21. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00108-710.1016/S1359-6454(00)00108-7 ↗
22. 10.1016/0022-5096(70)90029-310.1016/0022-5096(70)90029-3 ↗
23. 2009
24. 10.1016/S0022-5096(02)00034-010.1016/S0022-5096(02)00034-0 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.01810.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.018 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0927-796X(01)00040-710.1016/S0927-796X(01)00040-7 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.33379410.1063/1.333794 ↗
28. 10.1016/1359-6454(95)00426-210.1016/1359-6454(95)00426-2 ↗