journal article·2013-06-28

Influence of normal and shear strain on magnetic anisotropy energy of hcp cobalt: An ab initio study

Juan Wang, Jan-Michael Albina, Tomio Iwasaki, Hiroshi Moriya, Yoshitaka Umeno

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 28· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

The magnetic anisotropy energy (MAE) of the bulk hcp Co under mechanical deformation is calculated by ab initio density functional theory (DFT) calculations based on the projector augmented wave method. We present a thorough investigation with respect to the choice of exchange-correlation functionals. The generalized gradient approximation (GGA) succeeds in predicting the easy axis of magnetization but underestimates the MAE in comparison to the experimental value, whereas the local density approximation gives a wrong magnetic easy axis. The DFT+Umethod offers an alternative to increase the MAE value. Unfortunately, as the MAE reaches the experimental value, strong distortions of the lattice parameters are observed. Our results with GGA suggest that a simultaneous reduction of thec/aratio and increase of the lateral lattice parameterawill strongly enhance the MAE of the material, as observed experimentally. We also found that the MAE in hcp Co is reduced by shear strain.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1359-6454(97)00372-810.1016/S1359-6454(97)00372-8 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.17240710.1103/PhysRevB.69.172407 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.1562910.1103/PhysRevB.56.15629 ↗
4. 10.1016/0378-4363(85)90170-610.1016/0378-4363(85)90170-6 ↗
5. 10.1109/TMAG.2007.89312610.1109/TMAG.2007.893126 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.667110.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.287110.1103/PhysRevLett.75.2871 ↗
8. 10.1088/0953-8984/24/24/24550110.1088/0953-8984/24/24/245501 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.21640510.1103/PhysRevLett.87.216405 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.13442010.1103/PhysRevB.81.134420 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.1191910.1103/PhysRevB.41.11919 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.36132310.1063/1.361323 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
15. 10.1051/jphyscol:1988889210.1051/jphyscol:19888892 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.19512310.1103/PhysRevB.73.195123 ↗
17. 10.1109/20.80913410.1109/20.809134 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.106610.1103/PhysRevB.42.1066 ↗
19. 10.1080/0141159080197538510.1080/01411590801975385 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.283544810.1063/1.2835448 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.34486810.1063/1.344868 ↗
22. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/18/18500810.1088/0953-8984/21/18/185008 ↗
23. 10.1016/0304-8853(84)90248-810.1016/0304-8853(84)90248-8 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.731110.1103/PhysRevB.41.7311 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1424710.1103/PhysRevB.57.14247 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.10443010.1103/PhysRevB.64.104430 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.10442610.1103/PhysRevB.69.104426 ↗
28. 10.1051/jphyscol:198881810.1051/jphyscol:1988818 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.05240510.1103/PhysRevB.63.052405 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.1324410.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00351-010.1016/S0304-8853(99)00351-0 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.03511610.1103/PhysRevB.67.035116 ↗
35. 10.1088/0965-0393/17/1/01300110.1088/0965-0393/17/1/013001 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.28.541910.1103/PhysRevB.28.5419 ↗
37. 10.1007/BF0061701510.1007/BF00617015 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.1327210.1103/PhysRevB.45.13272 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.150510.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505 ↗
40. Mechanical demagnetization at head disk interface of perpendicular recording10.1109/TMAG.2008.2010670 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗